对重症监护病房患者耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎的革兰氏染色指导抗生素疗法进行评估。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1177/08850666241254736
Johanna Van Epps, Alexander J Lepak, Lucas T Schulz, Jeffrey Fish
{"title":"对重症监护病房患者耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎的革兰氏染色指导抗生素疗法进行评估。","authors":"Johanna Van Epps, Alexander J Lepak, Lucas T Schulz, Jeffrey Fish","doi":"10.1177/08850666241254736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Despite high negative predictive values (NPVs) seen with methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) nares polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, utilization of both respiratory sample Gram stain and MRSA nares PCR in patients with pneumonia may contribute to overuse of laboratory resources. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a Gram stain demonstrating no Gram-positive organisms from a respiratory sample is sufficient to allow for de-escalation of vancomycin therapy. <b>Methods:</b> This single center study retrospectively identified intensive care unit (ICU) patients started on vancomycin for presumed pneumonia at University of Wisconsin (UW) Health in Madison, WI between August 2022 and March 2023. Patients with respiratory sample demonstrating no Gram-positives on Gram stain met inclusion criteria if the sample was ordered within 24 h of vancomycin initiation. The primary outcome was NPV of respiratory sample Gram stain demonstrating no Gram-positive organisms with respect to MRSA detection of the respiratory culture. Secondary outcomes included the NPV of combined MRSA nares PCR plus respiratory sample Gram stain, and difference in time to event in patients that had both a respiratory sample and MRSA nares PCR ordered. <b>Results:</b> A total of 370 patients were screened for study eligibility; of which 99 patients met inclusion criteria. NPV of respiratory sample Gram stain was 99% for MRSA culture. The combined NPV of respiratory sample Gram stain plus MRSA nares PCR was 98.9% for MRSA culture (n = 88). Respiratory sample was ordered 2.3 h faster compared to MRSA nares PCR (4.3 vs 6.6 h, <i>P</i> = .036). Respiratory sample Gram stain resulted 4.5 h faster compared to MRSA nares PCR (10.7 vs 15.2 h, <i>P</i> = .002). <b>Conclusion:</b> Respiratory sample Gram stains demonstrating no Gram-positive organisms may be used to de-escalate vancomycin and deprioritize the use of MRSA nares PCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1231-1237"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Gram Stain-Guided Antibiotic Therapy for Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Van Epps, Alexander J Lepak, Lucas T Schulz, Jeffrey Fish\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08850666241254736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Despite high negative predictive values (NPVs) seen with methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) nares polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, utilization of both respiratory sample Gram stain and MRSA nares PCR in patients with pneumonia may contribute to overuse of laboratory resources. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a Gram stain demonstrating no Gram-positive organisms from a respiratory sample is sufficient to allow for de-escalation of vancomycin therapy. <b>Methods:</b> This single center study retrospectively identified intensive care unit (ICU) patients started on vancomycin for presumed pneumonia at University of Wisconsin (UW) Health in Madison, WI between August 2022 and March 2023. Patients with respiratory sample demonstrating no Gram-positives on Gram stain met inclusion criteria if the sample was ordered within 24 h of vancomycin initiation. The primary outcome was NPV of respiratory sample Gram stain demonstrating no Gram-positive organisms with respect to MRSA detection of the respiratory culture. Secondary outcomes included the NPV of combined MRSA nares PCR plus respiratory sample Gram stain, and difference in time to event in patients that had both a respiratory sample and MRSA nares PCR ordered. <b>Results:</b> A total of 370 patients were screened for study eligibility; of which 99 patients met inclusion criteria. NPV of respiratory sample Gram stain was 99% for MRSA culture. The combined NPV of respiratory sample Gram stain plus MRSA nares PCR was 98.9% for MRSA culture (n = 88). Respiratory sample was ordered 2.3 h faster compared to MRSA nares PCR (4.3 vs 6.6 h, <i>P</i> = .036). Respiratory sample Gram stain resulted 4.5 h faster compared to MRSA nares PCR (10.7 vs 15.2 h, <i>P</i> = .002). <b>Conclusion:</b> Respiratory sample Gram stains demonstrating no Gram-positive organisms may be used to de-escalate vancomycin and deprioritize the use of MRSA nares PCR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1231-1237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241254736\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241254736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)鼻腔聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测的阴性预测值(NPV)很高,但在肺炎患者中同时使用呼吸道样本革兰氏染色和 MRSA 鼻腔 PCR 检测可能会导致实验室资源的过度使用。本研究旨在评估呼吸道样本革兰氏染色显示无革兰氏阳性菌是否足以使万古霉素治疗降级。研究方法这项单中心研究回顾性地识别了2022年8月至2023年3月期间在威斯康星州麦迪逊市威斯康星大学(UW)健康中心因假定肺炎而开始使用万古霉素的重症监护病房(ICU)患者。呼吸道样本经革兰氏染色未显示革兰氏阳性的患者,如果样本是在开始使用万古霉素的 24 小时内采集的,则符合纳入标准。主要结果是呼吸道样本革兰氏染色显示无革兰氏阳性菌与呼吸道培养物中 MRSA 检测结果的 NPV。次要结果包括MRSA鼻腔PCR和呼吸道样本革兰氏染色联合检测的NPV,以及同时检测呼吸道样本和MRSA鼻腔PCR的患者发生事件的时间差异。结果:共筛选出 370 名符合研究资格的患者,其中 99 名患者符合纳入标准。呼吸道样本革兰氏染色对 MRSA 培养的 NPV 为 99%。呼吸道样本革兰氏染色加 MRSA 鼻腔 PCR 对 MRSA 培养的联合 NPV 为 98.9%(n = 88)。与 MRSA 鼻腔 PCR 相比,呼吸道样本的采集时间缩短了 2.3 小时(4.3 小时 vs 6.6 小时,P = 0.036)。呼吸道样本革兰氏染色结果比 MRSA 鼻腔 PCR 快 4.5 小时(10.7 小时 vs 15.2 小时,P = .002)。结论:呼吸道样本革兰氏染色显示无革兰氏阳性菌,可用于降低万古霉素的使用等级,并降低 MRSA 鼻腔 PCR 的使用优先级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Gram Stain-Guided Antibiotic Therapy for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Background: Despite high negative predictive values (NPVs) seen with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, utilization of both respiratory sample Gram stain and MRSA nares PCR in patients with pneumonia may contribute to overuse of laboratory resources. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a Gram stain demonstrating no Gram-positive organisms from a respiratory sample is sufficient to allow for de-escalation of vancomycin therapy. Methods: This single center study retrospectively identified intensive care unit (ICU) patients started on vancomycin for presumed pneumonia at University of Wisconsin (UW) Health in Madison, WI between August 2022 and March 2023. Patients with respiratory sample demonstrating no Gram-positives on Gram stain met inclusion criteria if the sample was ordered within 24 h of vancomycin initiation. The primary outcome was NPV of respiratory sample Gram stain demonstrating no Gram-positive organisms with respect to MRSA detection of the respiratory culture. Secondary outcomes included the NPV of combined MRSA nares PCR plus respiratory sample Gram stain, and difference in time to event in patients that had both a respiratory sample and MRSA nares PCR ordered. Results: A total of 370 patients were screened for study eligibility; of which 99 patients met inclusion criteria. NPV of respiratory sample Gram stain was 99% for MRSA culture. The combined NPV of respiratory sample Gram stain plus MRSA nares PCR was 98.9% for MRSA culture (n = 88). Respiratory sample was ordered 2.3 h faster compared to MRSA nares PCR (4.3 vs 6.6 h, P = .036). Respiratory sample Gram stain resulted 4.5 h faster compared to MRSA nares PCR (10.7 vs 15.2 h, P = .002). Conclusion: Respiratory sample Gram stains demonstrating no Gram-positive organisms may be used to de-escalate vancomycin and deprioritize the use of MRSA nares PCR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信