针对精神分裂症患者的每 6 个月一次帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯注射液的模型化临床开发:药效学桥接方法(第一部分)》。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Huybrecht T'jollyn, Alberto Russu, Raja Venkatasubramanian, Srihari Gopal, Partha Nandy, Martine Neyens, Ruben Faelens, Mahesh N Samtani, Oliver Ackaert, Juan Jose Perez-Ruixo
{"title":"针对精神分裂症患者的每 6 个月一次帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯注射液的模型化临床开发:药效学桥接方法(第一部分)》。","authors":"Huybrecht T'jollyn, Alberto Russu, Raja Venkatasubramanian, Srihari Gopal, Partha Nandy, Martine Neyens, Ruben Faelens, Mahesh N Samtani, Oliver Ackaert, Juan Jose Perez-Ruixo","doi":"10.1007/s13318-024-00900-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>A model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach was implemented for paliperidone palmitate (PP) 6-month (PP6M) clinical development, using pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model-based simulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PP6M pharmacokinetics were simulated by extending the PP 3-month (PP3M) pharmacokinetic model to account for increased injection volume, and hence dose. Contribution of the MIDD approach to the design of the pivotal PP6M phase-3 study (PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study, NCT03345342) investigating schizophrenia relapse rates was twofold: (1) PP6M dose selection, and (2) hypothesis generation that lower trough concentrations (C<sub>trough</sub>) associated with PP6M, relative to PP3M, were not associated with lower efficacy, which was to be evaluated in the phase-3 study. Moreover, accompanied by an intense sampling scheme to adequately characterize paliperidone pharmacokinetics and to elucidate the potential relationship between concentration and safety/efficacy, the bridging strategy eliminated the need for additional phase-1/phase-2 clinical studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using a MIDD bridging strategy, PP6M doses were selected that, compared with PP3M, were expected to have a similar range of exposures and a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile. Clinical data from PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study confirmed that PP6M, compared with PP3M, had a similar range of exposures (T'jollyn et al. in Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2024), as well as a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile (this manuscript).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistency of the MIDD approach with observed clinical outcomes confirmed the hypothesis that lower C<sub>trough</sub> did not lead to increased relapse rates at the doses administered. Although higher paliperidone peak concentrations are achieved with corresponding doses of PP6M relative to PP3M in the phase-3 clinical study, types and incidences of treatment-related adverse events were comparable between PP6M and PP3M groups and no new safety concerns emerged for PP6M (Najarian et al. in Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 25(3):238-251, 2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":11939,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":"477-489"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-Informed Clinical Development of Once-Every-6-Month Injection of Paliperidone Palmitate in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Pharmacometric Bridging Approach (Part I).\",\"authors\":\"Huybrecht T'jollyn, Alberto Russu, Raja Venkatasubramanian, Srihari Gopal, Partha Nandy, Martine Neyens, Ruben Faelens, Mahesh N Samtani, Oliver Ackaert, Juan Jose Perez-Ruixo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13318-024-00900-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>A model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach was implemented for paliperidone palmitate (PP) 6-month (PP6M) clinical development, using pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model-based simulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PP6M pharmacokinetics were simulated by extending the PP 3-month (PP3M) pharmacokinetic model to account for increased injection volume, and hence dose. Contribution of the MIDD approach to the design of the pivotal PP6M phase-3 study (PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study, NCT03345342) investigating schizophrenia relapse rates was twofold: (1) PP6M dose selection, and (2) hypothesis generation that lower trough concentrations (C<sub>trough</sub>) associated with PP6M, relative to PP3M, were not associated with lower efficacy, which was to be evaluated in the phase-3 study. Moreover, accompanied by an intense sampling scheme to adequately characterize paliperidone pharmacokinetics and to elucidate the potential relationship between concentration and safety/efficacy, the bridging strategy eliminated the need for additional phase-1/phase-2 clinical studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using a MIDD bridging strategy, PP6M doses were selected that, compared with PP3M, were expected to have a similar range of exposures and a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile. Clinical data from PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study confirmed that PP6M, compared with PP3M, had a similar range of exposures (T'jollyn et al. in Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2024), as well as a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile (this manuscript).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistency of the MIDD approach with observed clinical outcomes confirmed the hypothesis that lower C<sub>trough</sub> did not lead to increased relapse rates at the doses administered. Although higher paliperidone peak concentrations are achieved with corresponding doses of PP6M relative to PP3M in the phase-3 clinical study, types and incidences of treatment-related adverse events were comparable between PP6M and PP3M groups and no new safety concerns emerged for PP6M (Najarian et al. in Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 25(3):238-251, 2022).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"477-489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-024-00900-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-024-00900-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:采用基于药代动力学和药动学/药效学模型的模拟,为帕利哌酮棕榈酸酯(PP)6个月(PP6M)的临床开发实施了模型信息药物开发(MIDD)方法:通过扩展帕利哌酮 3 个月(PP3M)药代动力学模型,模拟帕利哌酮 6 个月的药代动力学,以考虑注射剂量的增加,进而考虑剂量的增加。MIDD方法对PP6M第3阶段关键性研究(PP6M/PP3M非劣效性研究,NCT03345342)的设计有两方面的贡献:(1)PP6M的剂量选择;(2)假设PP6M相对于PP3M较低的谷浓度(Ctrough)与较低的疗效无关,这将在第3阶段研究中进行评估。此外,为了充分描述帕利哌酮的药代动力学特征并阐明浓度与安全性/疗效之间的潜在关系,该桥接策略还采用了密集采样方案,因此无需进行额外的1期/2期临床研究:利用MIDD桥接策略,选择了PP6M剂量,与PP3M相比,预计其暴露范围相似,复发率和安全性均不低于PP3M。PP6M/PP3M 非劣效性研究的临床数据证实,与 PP3M 相比,PP6M 的暴露范围相似(T'jollyn 等人,发表于 Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2024),复发率和安全性也不劣于 PP3M(本手稿):MIDD方法与观察到的临床结果一致,证实了在给药剂量下较低的Ctrough不会导致复发率增加的假设。虽然在第三阶段临床研究中,相对于PP3M,相应剂量的PP6M能达到更高的帕利哌酮峰值浓度,但PP6M组与PP3M组之间治疗相关不良事件的类型和发生率相当,PP6M没有出现新的安全性问题(Najarian等,载于Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 25(3):238-251,2022年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Model-Informed Clinical Development of Once-Every-6-Month Injection of Paliperidone Palmitate in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Pharmacometric Bridging Approach (Part I).

Model-Informed Clinical Development of Once-Every-6-Month Injection of Paliperidone Palmitate in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Pharmacometric Bridging Approach (Part I).

Background and objective: A model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach was implemented for paliperidone palmitate (PP) 6-month (PP6M) clinical development, using pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model-based simulations.

Methods: PP6M pharmacokinetics were simulated by extending the PP 3-month (PP3M) pharmacokinetic model to account for increased injection volume, and hence dose. Contribution of the MIDD approach to the design of the pivotal PP6M phase-3 study (PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study, NCT03345342) investigating schizophrenia relapse rates was twofold: (1) PP6M dose selection, and (2) hypothesis generation that lower trough concentrations (Ctrough) associated with PP6M, relative to PP3M, were not associated with lower efficacy, which was to be evaluated in the phase-3 study. Moreover, accompanied by an intense sampling scheme to adequately characterize paliperidone pharmacokinetics and to elucidate the potential relationship between concentration and safety/efficacy, the bridging strategy eliminated the need for additional phase-1/phase-2 clinical studies.

Results: Using a MIDD bridging strategy, PP6M doses were selected that, compared with PP3M, were expected to have a similar range of exposures and a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile. Clinical data from PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study confirmed that PP6M, compared with PP3M, had a similar range of exposures (T'jollyn et al. in Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2024), as well as a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile (this manuscript).

Conclusions: Consistency of the MIDD approach with observed clinical outcomes confirmed the hypothesis that lower Ctrough did not lead to increased relapse rates at the doses administered. Although higher paliperidone peak concentrations are achieved with corresponding doses of PP6M relative to PP3M in the phase-3 clinical study, types and incidences of treatment-related adverse events were comparable between PP6M and PP3M groups and no new safety concerns emerged for PP6M (Najarian et al. in Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 25(3):238-251, 2022).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal focuses mainly on new and emerging diagnostic and treatment options, protocols and molecular and cellular basis of disease pathogenesis, new technologies, in liver and biliary sciences. Hepatology International publishes original research articles related to clinical care and basic research; review articles; consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment; invited editorials, and controversies in contemporary issues. The journal does not publish case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信