{"title":"广义协方差与量纲之谜","authors":"Eleanor March, James Owen Weatherall","doi":"arxiv-2405.03906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider two simple criteria for when a physical theory should be said to\nbe \"generally covariant\", and we argue that these criteria are not met by\nYang-Mills theory, even on geometric formulations of that theory. The reason,\nwe show, is that the bundles encountered in Yang-Mills theory are not natural\nbundles; instead, they are gauge-natural. We then show how these observations\nrelate to previous arguments about the significance of solder forms in\nassessing disanalogies between general relativity and Yang-Mills theory. We\nconclude by suggesting that general covariance is really about functoriality.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"11 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Puzzle About General Covariance and Gauge\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor March, James Owen Weatherall\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2405.03906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider two simple criteria for when a physical theory should be said to\\nbe \\\"generally covariant\\\", and we argue that these criteria are not met by\\nYang-Mills theory, even on geometric formulations of that theory. The reason,\\nwe show, is that the bundles encountered in Yang-Mills theory are not natural\\nbundles; instead, they are gauge-natural. We then show how these observations\\nrelate to previous arguments about the significance of solder forms in\\nassessing disanalogies between general relativity and Yang-Mills theory. We\\nconclude by suggesting that general covariance is really about functoriality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics\",\"volume\":\"11 2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.03906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.03906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We consider two simple criteria for when a physical theory should be said to
be "generally covariant", and we argue that these criteria are not met by
Yang-Mills theory, even on geometric formulations of that theory. The reason,
we show, is that the bundles encountered in Yang-Mills theory are not natural
bundles; instead, they are gauge-natural. We then show how these observations
relate to previous arguments about the significance of solder forms in
assessing disanalogies between general relativity and Yang-Mills theory. We
conclude by suggesting that general covariance is really about functoriality.