广义协方差与量纲之谜

Eleanor March, James Owen Weatherall
{"title":"广义协方差与量纲之谜","authors":"Eleanor March, James Owen Weatherall","doi":"arxiv-2405.03906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider two simple criteria for when a physical theory should be said to\nbe \"generally covariant\", and we argue that these criteria are not met by\nYang-Mills theory, even on geometric formulations of that theory. The reason,\nwe show, is that the bundles encountered in Yang-Mills theory are not natural\nbundles; instead, they are gauge-natural. We then show how these observations\nrelate to previous arguments about the significance of solder forms in\nassessing disanalogies between general relativity and Yang-Mills theory. We\nconclude by suggesting that general covariance is really about functoriality.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"11 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Puzzle About General Covariance and Gauge\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor March, James Owen Weatherall\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2405.03906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider two simple criteria for when a physical theory should be said to\\nbe \\\"generally covariant\\\", and we argue that these criteria are not met by\\nYang-Mills theory, even on geometric formulations of that theory. The reason,\\nwe show, is that the bundles encountered in Yang-Mills theory are not natural\\nbundles; instead, they are gauge-natural. We then show how these observations\\nrelate to previous arguments about the significance of solder forms in\\nassessing disanalogies between general relativity and Yang-Mills theory. We\\nconclude by suggesting that general covariance is really about functoriality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics\",\"volume\":\"11 2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.03906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.03906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们认为杨-米尔斯理论不符合这些标准,即使在该理论的几何形式上也是如此。我们指出,原因在于杨-米尔斯理论中的束不是自然束,而是规自然束。然后,我们展示了这些观察如何与之前关于焊料形式在评估广义相对论和杨-米尔斯理论之间的不相似性时的重要性的论点相关联。最后,我们认为广义协方差实际上是关于扇形性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Puzzle About General Covariance and Gauge
We consider two simple criteria for when a physical theory should be said to be "generally covariant", and we argue that these criteria are not met by Yang-Mills theory, even on geometric formulations of that theory. The reason, we show, is that the bundles encountered in Yang-Mills theory are not natural bundles; instead, they are gauge-natural. We then show how these observations relate to previous arguments about the significance of solder forms in assessing disanalogies between general relativity and Yang-Mills theory. We conclude by suggesting that general covariance is really about functoriality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信