衡量草原生态补偿政策的交易成本:以内蒙古自治区草原保护补偿奖励政策为例

IF 1.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Rangeland Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1071/rj23046
Bao Zhang, Scott Waldron, Colin Brown, Jing Zhang, Guanghua Qiao
{"title":"衡量草原生态补偿政策的交易成本:以内蒙古自治区草原保护补偿奖励政策为例","authors":"Bao Zhang, Scott Waldron, Colin Brown, Jing Zhang, Guanghua Qiao","doi":"10.1071/rj23046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>China is investing heavily in agri-environmental and eco-compensation schemes to address growing environmental problems in rural areas. However, assessments of the schemes often overlook transaction costs. Transaction costs are of particular importance in pastoral areas characterised by remoteness, dispersed populations, diverse agro-ecological conditions and heterogeneous livestock systems. Drawing on principles from institutional economics, this analysis investigated transaction costs associated with China’s current grassland eco-compensation schemes in Inner Mongolia and how they might change under alternative policy scenarios. The analysis examined the magnitude of overall transaction costs, their disaggregation among cost types and the incidence of the transaction costs at different administrative levels. The analysis found that the relative magnitude of transaction costs is substantial for the existing policy, whereas an alternative policy more effective in achieving stocking-rate reductions and improved grassland conditions increases transaction costs more than two-fold. The analysis demonstrated the value in accounting for transaction costs in the design and assessment of eco-compensation schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20810,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring transaction costs of grassland eco-compensation policies: the case of the Compensation and Rewards Policy for Grassland Protection in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region\",\"authors\":\"Bao Zhang, Scott Waldron, Colin Brown, Jing Zhang, Guanghua Qiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/rj23046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>China is investing heavily in agri-environmental and eco-compensation schemes to address growing environmental problems in rural areas. However, assessments of the schemes often overlook transaction costs. Transaction costs are of particular importance in pastoral areas characterised by remoteness, dispersed populations, diverse agro-ecological conditions and heterogeneous livestock systems. Drawing on principles from institutional economics, this analysis investigated transaction costs associated with China’s current grassland eco-compensation schemes in Inner Mongolia and how they might change under alternative policy scenarios. The analysis examined the magnitude of overall transaction costs, their disaggregation among cost types and the incidence of the transaction costs at different administrative levels. The analysis found that the relative magnitude of transaction costs is substantial for the existing policy, whereas an alternative policy more effective in achieving stocking-rate reductions and improved grassland conditions increases transaction costs more than two-fold. The analysis demonstrated the value in accounting for transaction costs in the design and assessment of eco-compensation schemes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rangeland Journal\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rangeland Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/rj23046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/rj23046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国正在大力投资农业环境和生态补偿计划,以解决农村地区日益严重的环境问题。然而,对这些计划的评估往往忽略了交易成本。牧区地处偏远,人口分散,农业生态条件各异,畜牧业系统也不尽相同,因此交易成本在牧区显得尤为重要。本分析借鉴制度经济学的原理,研究了与中国目前在内蒙古实施的草原生态补偿计划相关的交易成本,以及在其他政策情景下交易成本可能发生的变化。分析研究了总体交易成本的规模、成本类型的细分以及不同行政级别交易成本的发生率。分析发现,现行政策的交易成本相对较高,而更有效地降低牲畜存栏率和改善草原条件的替代政策则会使交易成本增加两倍以上。分析表明,在设计和评估生态补偿计划时考虑交易成本是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring transaction costs of grassland eco-compensation policies: the case of the Compensation and Rewards Policy for Grassland Protection in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region

China is investing heavily in agri-environmental and eco-compensation schemes to address growing environmental problems in rural areas. However, assessments of the schemes often overlook transaction costs. Transaction costs are of particular importance in pastoral areas characterised by remoteness, dispersed populations, diverse agro-ecological conditions and heterogeneous livestock systems. Drawing on principles from institutional economics, this analysis investigated transaction costs associated with China’s current grassland eco-compensation schemes in Inner Mongolia and how they might change under alternative policy scenarios. The analysis examined the magnitude of overall transaction costs, their disaggregation among cost types and the incidence of the transaction costs at different administrative levels. The analysis found that the relative magnitude of transaction costs is substantial for the existing policy, whereas an alternative policy more effective in achieving stocking-rate reductions and improved grassland conditions increases transaction costs more than two-fold. The analysis demonstrated the value in accounting for transaction costs in the design and assessment of eco-compensation schemes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rangeland Journal
Rangeland Journal 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Rangeland Journal publishes original work that makes a significant contribution to understanding the biophysical, social, cultural, economic, and policy influences affecting rangeland use and management throughout the world. Rangelands are defined broadly and include all those environments where natural ecological processes predominate, and where values and benefits are based primarily on natural resources. Articles may present the results of original research, contributions to theory or new conclusions reached from the review of a topic. Their structure need not conform to that of standard scientific articles but writing style must be clear and concise. All material presented must be well documented, critically analysed and objectively presented. All papers are peer-reviewed. The Rangeland Journal is published on behalf of the Australian Rangeland Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信