回测预期亏损:利用二元正交多项式计算持续时间和严重程度

Sullivan Hué, Christophe Hurlin, Yang Lu
{"title":"回测预期亏损:利用二元正交多项式计算持续时间和严重程度","authors":"Sullivan Hué, Christophe Hurlin, Yang Lu","doi":"arxiv-2405.02012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose an original two-part, duration-severity approach for backtesting\nExpected Shortfall (ES). While Probability Integral Transform (PIT) based ES\nbacktests have gained popularity, they have yet to allow for separate testing\nof the frequency and severity of Value-at-Risk (VaR) violations. This is a\ncrucial aspect, as ES measures the average loss in the event of such\nviolations. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a backtesting framework\nthat relies on the sequence of inter-violation durations and the sequence of\nseverities in case of violations. By leveraging the theory of (bivariate)\northogonal polynomials, we derive orthogonal moment conditions satisfied by\nthese two sequences. Our approach includes a straightforward, model-free Wald\ntest, which encompasses various unconditional and conditional coverage\nbacktests for both VaR and ES. This test aids in identifying any mis-specified\ncomponents of the internal model used by banks to forecast ES. Moreover, it can\nbe extended to analyze other systemic risk measures such as Marginal Expected\nShortfall. Simulation experiments indicate that our test exhibits good finite\nsample properties for realistic sample sizes. Through application to two stock\nindices, we demonstrate how our methodology provides insights into the reasons\nfor rejections in testing ES validity.","PeriodicalId":501128,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management","volume":"212 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Backtesting Expected Shortfall: Accounting for both duration and severity with bivariate orthogonal polynomials\",\"authors\":\"Sullivan Hué, Christophe Hurlin, Yang Lu\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2405.02012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose an original two-part, duration-severity approach for backtesting\\nExpected Shortfall (ES). While Probability Integral Transform (PIT) based ES\\nbacktests have gained popularity, they have yet to allow for separate testing\\nof the frequency and severity of Value-at-Risk (VaR) violations. This is a\\ncrucial aspect, as ES measures the average loss in the event of such\\nviolations. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a backtesting framework\\nthat relies on the sequence of inter-violation durations and the sequence of\\nseverities in case of violations. By leveraging the theory of (bivariate)\\northogonal polynomials, we derive orthogonal moment conditions satisfied by\\nthese two sequences. Our approach includes a straightforward, model-free Wald\\ntest, which encompasses various unconditional and conditional coverage\\nbacktests for both VaR and ES. This test aids in identifying any mis-specified\\ncomponents of the internal model used by banks to forecast ES. Moreover, it can\\nbe extended to analyze other systemic risk measures such as Marginal Expected\\nShortfall. Simulation experiments indicate that our test exhibits good finite\\nsample properties for realistic sample sizes. Through application to two stock\\nindices, we demonstrate how our methodology provides insights into the reasons\\nfor rejections in testing ES validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"212 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.02012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.02012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了一种独创的由两部分组成的持续时间-平均值方法,用于回测预期短缺(ES)。虽然基于概率积分变换(PIT)的 ES 回测已广为流行,但它们尚未允许对违反风险价值(VaR)的频率和严重程度进行单独测试。这一点至关重要,因为 ES 衡量的是发生此类违规时的平均损失。为了克服这一局限性,我们引入了一个回溯测试框架,该框架依赖于违规间隔时间序列和违规情况下的严重程度序列。通过利用(双变量)正交多项式理论,我们得出了这两个序列所满足的正交矩条件。我们的方法包括直接的、无模型的沃尔德检验,其中包括对 VaR 和 ES 的各种无条件和条件覆盖率检验。该检验有助于识别银行用于预测 ES 的内部模型中的任何错误规范部分。此外,它还可以扩展到分析其他系统性风险指标,如边际预期损失。模拟实验表明,我们的检验在实际样本量下表现出良好的有限样本特性。通过对两个股票指数的应用,我们展示了我们的方法如何为测试 ES 有效性时出现拒绝的原因提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Backtesting Expected Shortfall: Accounting for both duration and severity with bivariate orthogonal polynomials
We propose an original two-part, duration-severity approach for backtesting Expected Shortfall (ES). While Probability Integral Transform (PIT) based ES backtests have gained popularity, they have yet to allow for separate testing of the frequency and severity of Value-at-Risk (VaR) violations. This is a crucial aspect, as ES measures the average loss in the event of such violations. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a backtesting framework that relies on the sequence of inter-violation durations and the sequence of severities in case of violations. By leveraging the theory of (bivariate) orthogonal polynomials, we derive orthogonal moment conditions satisfied by these two sequences. Our approach includes a straightforward, model-free Wald test, which encompasses various unconditional and conditional coverage backtests for both VaR and ES. This test aids in identifying any mis-specified components of the internal model used by banks to forecast ES. Moreover, it can be extended to analyze other systemic risk measures such as Marginal Expected Shortfall. Simulation experiments indicate that our test exhibits good finite sample properties for realistic sample sizes. Through application to two stock indices, we demonstrate how our methodology provides insights into the reasons for rejections in testing ES validity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信