用于空气质量指数预报的高阶模糊时间序列预报方法的研究与开发

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sushree Subhaprada Pradhan, Sibarama Panigrahi
{"title":"用于空气质量指数预报的高阶模糊时间序列预报方法的研究与开发","authors":"Sushree Subhaprada Pradhan,&nbsp;Sibarama Panigrahi","doi":"10.1002/for.3153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The endless adverse effects of air pollution incidents have raised significant public concerns in the past few decades. The measure of air pollution, that is, the air quality index (AQI), is highly volatile and associated with different kinds of uncertainties. Following this, the study and development of accurate fuzzy time series forecasting (TSF) methods for predicting the AQI have a significant role in air pollution control and management. Motivated by this, in this paper, a systematic study is made to evaluate the true potential of fuzzy TSF methods employing traditional fuzzy set (TFS), intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS), hesitant fuzzy set (HFS), and neutrosophic fuzzy set (NFS) in forecasting the AQI. Two novel high-order fuzzy TSF methods, TFS-multilayer perceptron (MLP) and HFS-MLP, are proposed employing TFS and HFS in which ratio trend variation of AQI data is used instead of original AQI, MLP is used to model the fuzzy logical relationships (FLRs), and none/mean of aggregated membership values are used while modeling the FLRs using MLP. The results from the proposed fuzzy TSF methods are compared with recently proposed fuzzy TSF methods employing TFS, IFS, and NFS and six popular machine learning models, including MLP, support vector regression (SVR), Bagging Regressors, XGBoost, long-short term memory (LSTM), and convolutional neural network (CNN). The “Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test” and “Friedman and Nemenyi hypothesis test” are applied to the results obtained by employing different ratios in the train-validation-test to draw decisive conclusions reliably. The simulation results show the statistical dominance of the proposed TFS-MLP method over all other crisp and fuzzy TSF methods employed in this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":47835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forecasting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study and development of high-order fuzzy time series forecasting methods for air quality index forecasting\",\"authors\":\"Sushree Subhaprada Pradhan,&nbsp;Sibarama Panigrahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/for.3153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The endless adverse effects of air pollution incidents have raised significant public concerns in the past few decades. The measure of air pollution, that is, the air quality index (AQI), is highly volatile and associated with different kinds of uncertainties. Following this, the study and development of accurate fuzzy time series forecasting (TSF) methods for predicting the AQI have a significant role in air pollution control and management. Motivated by this, in this paper, a systematic study is made to evaluate the true potential of fuzzy TSF methods employing traditional fuzzy set (TFS), intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS), hesitant fuzzy set (HFS), and neutrosophic fuzzy set (NFS) in forecasting the AQI. Two novel high-order fuzzy TSF methods, TFS-multilayer perceptron (MLP) and HFS-MLP, are proposed employing TFS and HFS in which ratio trend variation of AQI data is used instead of original AQI, MLP is used to model the fuzzy logical relationships (FLRs), and none/mean of aggregated membership values are used while modeling the FLRs using MLP. The results from the proposed fuzzy TSF methods are compared with recently proposed fuzzy TSF methods employing TFS, IFS, and NFS and six popular machine learning models, including MLP, support vector regression (SVR), Bagging Regressors, XGBoost, long-short term memory (LSTM), and convolutional neural network (CNN). The “Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test” and “Friedman and Nemenyi hypothesis test” are applied to the results obtained by employing different ratios in the train-validation-test to draw decisive conclusions reliably. The simulation results show the statistical dominance of the proposed TFS-MLP method over all other crisp and fuzzy TSF methods employed in this paper.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forecasting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forecasting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/for.3153\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/for.3153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去几十年来,空气污染事件带来的无尽负面影响引起了公众的极大关注。衡量空气污染的指标,即空气质量指数(AQI),具有很大的不稳定性,并与各种不确定性相关联。因此,研究和开发用于预测空气质量指数的精确模糊时间序列预测(TSF)方法在空气污染控制和管理中具有重要作用。受此启发,本文系统研究了传统模糊集(TFS)、直觉模糊集(IFS)、犹豫模糊集(HFS)和中性模糊集(NFS)等模糊 TSF 方法在预测空气质量指数方面的真正潜力。本文提出了两种新颖的高阶模糊 TSF 方法:TFS-多层感知器(MLP)和 HFS-MLP,其中 TFS 和 HFS 使用空气质量指数数据的比率趋势变化代替原始空气质量指数,MLP 用于模糊逻辑关系(FLR)建模,而在使用 MLP 对 FLR 建模时使用了聚集成员值的非/平均值。将所提出的模糊 TSF 方法的结果与最近提出的采用 TFS、IFS 和 NFS 的模糊 TSF 方法以及六种流行的机器学习模型(包括 MLP、支持向量回归 (SVR)、袋装回归器 (Bagging Regressors)、XGBoost、长短期记忆 (LSTM) 和卷积神经网络 (CNN))进行了比较。对训练-验证-测试中采用不同比例得到的结果进行了 "Wilcoxon Signed-Rank 检验 "和 "Friedman 和 Nemenyi 假设检验",以可靠地得出决定性结论。仿真结果表明,与本文采用的所有其他简明和模糊 TSF 方法相比,所提出的 TFS-MLP 方法在统计上占优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study and development of high-order fuzzy time series forecasting methods for air quality index forecasting

The endless adverse effects of air pollution incidents have raised significant public concerns in the past few decades. The measure of air pollution, that is, the air quality index (AQI), is highly volatile and associated with different kinds of uncertainties. Following this, the study and development of accurate fuzzy time series forecasting (TSF) methods for predicting the AQI have a significant role in air pollution control and management. Motivated by this, in this paper, a systematic study is made to evaluate the true potential of fuzzy TSF methods employing traditional fuzzy set (TFS), intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS), hesitant fuzzy set (HFS), and neutrosophic fuzzy set (NFS) in forecasting the AQI. Two novel high-order fuzzy TSF methods, TFS-multilayer perceptron (MLP) and HFS-MLP, are proposed employing TFS and HFS in which ratio trend variation of AQI data is used instead of original AQI, MLP is used to model the fuzzy logical relationships (FLRs), and none/mean of aggregated membership values are used while modeling the FLRs using MLP. The results from the proposed fuzzy TSF methods are compared with recently proposed fuzzy TSF methods employing TFS, IFS, and NFS and six popular machine learning models, including MLP, support vector regression (SVR), Bagging Regressors, XGBoost, long-short term memory (LSTM), and convolutional neural network (CNN). The “Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test” and “Friedman and Nemenyi hypothesis test” are applied to the results obtained by employing different ratios in the train-validation-test to draw decisive conclusions reliably. The simulation results show the statistical dominance of the proposed TFS-MLP method over all other crisp and fuzzy TSF methods employed in this paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forecasting is an international journal that publishes refereed papers on forecasting. It is multidisciplinary, welcoming papers dealing with any aspect of forecasting: theoretical, practical, computational and methodological. A broad interpretation of the topic is taken with approaches from various subject areas, such as statistics, economics, psychology, systems engineering and social sciences, all encouraged. Furthermore, the Journal welcomes a wide diversity of applications in such fields as business, government, technology and the environment. Of particular interest are papers dealing with modelling issues and the relationship of forecasting systems to decision-making processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信