探索废弃油炸食用油生物柴油/柴油/低碳甲醇在汽车发动机中的多种混合比例:燃料表征、实验和多标准决策方法的一种方法

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
M. Ananda Murugan, G. Nataraj
{"title":"探索废弃油炸食用油生物柴油/柴油/低碳甲醇在汽车发动机中的多种混合比例:燃料表征、实验和多标准决策方法的一种方法","authors":"M. Ananda Murugan,&nbsp;G. Nataraj","doi":"10.1002/ep.14394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A low-cost, high-performance alternative fuel to traditional fossil fuels is required due to rising energy demand, fossil fuel depletion, and rising prices. In this case, one of the green fuels could be synthesized using transesterification from waste-fried edible oil (WFEO). The current study deals with neat diesel (D100) and waste-fried edible oil biodiesel (B100) as the baseline fuels. By volume, a binary blend of 50% diesel and 50% WFEO biodiesel was prepared. The biodiesel/methanol/diesel mixture was considered a ternary blend under two different ternary ratios, such as B40M10D50 and B30M20D50, respectively. The fuel characterization and the rheological study were performed for all the fuel blends as per the ASTM standards. According to engine experimental results, the B30M20D50 blend has 25.42% higher brake thermal efficiency (BTE) than B100 but 3.4% lower than D100 at full load due to the higher methanol percentage. When compared with D100, adding 20% methanol to the ternary blend reduced brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) by 33.34%. Both ternary blends increased NOx emissions by 27.38% and 22.97% compared to D100 but decreased them by 14.23% and 18.68% compared to B100. Both ternary blends produced 0.4 and 0.36 kg/kWh at lower loads, while the D100 and B100 produced 0.46 and 0.42 kg/kWh. Finally, the entropy-weighted technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) multi-criteria decision-making method was used to determine the best blend for engine performance and emissions. The entropy-weighted TOPSIS technique likewise found that a B30M20D50 ternary blend with 75% loading had the lowest emissions and best performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11701,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the multifarious blend ratios of waste fried edible oil biodiesel/diesel/low carbon methanol in an automotive engine: An approach towards fuel characterization, experimental, and multicriteria decision making method\",\"authors\":\"M. Ananda Murugan,&nbsp;G. Nataraj\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ep.14394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A low-cost, high-performance alternative fuel to traditional fossil fuels is required due to rising energy demand, fossil fuel depletion, and rising prices. In this case, one of the green fuels could be synthesized using transesterification from waste-fried edible oil (WFEO). The current study deals with neat diesel (D100) and waste-fried edible oil biodiesel (B100) as the baseline fuels. By volume, a binary blend of 50% diesel and 50% WFEO biodiesel was prepared. The biodiesel/methanol/diesel mixture was considered a ternary blend under two different ternary ratios, such as B40M10D50 and B30M20D50, respectively. The fuel characterization and the rheological study were performed for all the fuel blends as per the ASTM standards. According to engine experimental results, the B30M20D50 blend has 25.42% higher brake thermal efficiency (BTE) than B100 but 3.4% lower than D100 at full load due to the higher methanol percentage. When compared with D100, adding 20% methanol to the ternary blend reduced brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) by 33.34%. Both ternary blends increased NOx emissions by 27.38% and 22.97% compared to D100 but decreased them by 14.23% and 18.68% compared to B100. Both ternary blends produced 0.4 and 0.36 kg/kWh at lower loads, while the D100 and B100 produced 0.46 and 0.42 kg/kWh. Finally, the entropy-weighted technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) multi-criteria decision-making method was used to determine the best blend for engine performance and emissions. The entropy-weighted TOPSIS technique likewise found that a B30M20D50 ternary blend with 75% loading had the lowest emissions and best performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy\",\"volume\":\"43 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.14394\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.14394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于能源需求上升、化石燃料枯竭和价格上涨,需要一种低成本、高性能的替代燃料来替代传统化石燃料。在这种情况下,可以利用废弃油炸食用油(WFEO)的酯交换反应合成绿色燃料。本研究以纯柴油(D100)和废弃油炸食用油生物柴油(B100)为基准燃料。按体积计算,制备了 50%柴油和 50%废弃油炸食用油生物柴油的二元混合燃料。生物柴油/甲醇/柴油混合物在两种不同的三元比例(如 B40M10D50 和 B30M20D50)下被视为三元混合物。根据 ASTM 标准,对所有混合燃料进行了燃料表征和流变学研究。根据发动机实验结果,B30M20D50 混合燃料的制动热效率(BTE)比 B100 高 25.42%,但由于甲醇比例较高,满负荷时比 D100 低 3.4%。与 D100 相比,在三元混合物中添加 20% 的甲醇可使制动油耗(BSFC)降低 33.34%。与 D100 相比,两种三元混合燃料的氮氧化物排放量分别增加了 27.38% 和 22.97%,但与 B100 相比,氮氧化物排放量分别减少了 14.23% 和 18.68%。两种三元混合燃料在较低负荷时的产量分别为 0.4 和 0.36 千克/千瓦时,而 D100 和 B100 的产量分别为 0.46 和 0.42 千克/千瓦时。最后,采用了熵权法(TOPSIS)多标准决策方法,通过与理想解的相似性进行排序优选,以确定发动机性能和排放的最佳混合燃料。熵权 TOPSIS 技术同样发现,75% 负载的 B30M20D50 三元混合燃料具有最低的排放和最佳的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the multifarious blend ratios of waste fried edible oil biodiesel/diesel/low carbon methanol in an automotive engine: An approach towards fuel characterization, experimental, and multicriteria decision making method

A low-cost, high-performance alternative fuel to traditional fossil fuels is required due to rising energy demand, fossil fuel depletion, and rising prices. In this case, one of the green fuels could be synthesized using transesterification from waste-fried edible oil (WFEO). The current study deals with neat diesel (D100) and waste-fried edible oil biodiesel (B100) as the baseline fuels. By volume, a binary blend of 50% diesel and 50% WFEO biodiesel was prepared. The biodiesel/methanol/diesel mixture was considered a ternary blend under two different ternary ratios, such as B40M10D50 and B30M20D50, respectively. The fuel characterization and the rheological study were performed for all the fuel blends as per the ASTM standards. According to engine experimental results, the B30M20D50 blend has 25.42% higher brake thermal efficiency (BTE) than B100 but 3.4% lower than D100 at full load due to the higher methanol percentage. When compared with D100, adding 20% methanol to the ternary blend reduced brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) by 33.34%. Both ternary blends increased NOx emissions by 27.38% and 22.97% compared to D100 but decreased them by 14.23% and 18.68% compared to B100. Both ternary blends produced 0.4 and 0.36 kg/kWh at lower loads, while the D100 and B100 produced 0.46 and 0.42 kg/kWh. Finally, the entropy-weighted technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) multi-criteria decision-making method was used to determine the best blend for engine performance and emissions. The entropy-weighted TOPSIS technique likewise found that a B30M20D50 ternary blend with 75% loading had the lowest emissions and best performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Progress , a quarterly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, reports on critical issues like remediation and treatment of solid or aqueous wastes, air pollution, sustainability, and sustainable energy. Each issue helps chemical engineers (and those in related fields) stay on top of technological advances in all areas associated with the environment through feature articles, updates, book and software reviews, and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信