划分默认错误严重程度的机器学习方法

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q1 Multidisciplinary
Abdalrahman Aburakhia, Mohammad Alshayeb
{"title":"划分默认错误严重程度的机器学习方法","authors":"Abdalrahman Aburakhia, Mohammad Alshayeb","doi":"10.1007/s13369-024-09081-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bug reports (BRs) play a major role in the software maintenance process; they alert developers about the bugs discovered by the end-users. Software applications utilize bug tracking systems (BTS) to manage submitted bug reports. Recent studies showed that the majority of BRs in BTS belong to the default severity category, which does not represent their actual severity. In this paper, we propose an approach that can automatically classify default bug reports into severe or non-severe categories. We curated a dataset based on the history of bug report logs. After that, we used the Support Vector Machine algorithm and Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency feature extraction method to classify default bug reports into severe or non-severe categories. The results show that building customized models for default severity bug reports provides better and more reliable results than training one model for all severity. Overall, the proposed Log model outperformed the three models (approaches) from the literature; it achieved an improvement of up to ~ 4% f-measure compared to others, and in some projects, it achieved an improvement of 11.2% f-measure. Moreover, we investigated the impact of sentiment analysis on default bug severity prediction; the results show no noticeable influence.</p>","PeriodicalId":8109,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","volume":"205 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Machine Learning Approach for Classifying the Default Bug Severity Level\",\"authors\":\"Abdalrahman Aburakhia, Mohammad Alshayeb\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13369-024-09081-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bug reports (BRs) play a major role in the software maintenance process; they alert developers about the bugs discovered by the end-users. Software applications utilize bug tracking systems (BTS) to manage submitted bug reports. Recent studies showed that the majority of BRs in BTS belong to the default severity category, which does not represent their actual severity. In this paper, we propose an approach that can automatically classify default bug reports into severe or non-severe categories. We curated a dataset based on the history of bug report logs. After that, we used the Support Vector Machine algorithm and Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency feature extraction method to classify default bug reports into severe or non-severe categories. The results show that building customized models for default severity bug reports provides better and more reliable results than training one model for all severity. Overall, the proposed Log model outperformed the three models (approaches) from the literature; it achieved an improvement of up to ~ 4% f-measure compared to others, and in some projects, it achieved an improvement of 11.2% f-measure. Moreover, we investigated the impact of sentiment analysis on default bug severity prediction; the results show no noticeable influence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"205 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09081-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09081-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

错误报告(BR)在软件维护过程中发挥着重要作用;它们提醒开发人员注意最终用户发现的错误。软件应用程序利用错误跟踪系统(BTS)来管理提交的错误报告。最近的研究表明,BTS 中的大多数 BR 都属于默认严重性类别,这并不代表它们的实际严重性。在本文中,我们提出了一种可将默认错误报告自动划分为严重或非严重类别的方法。我们根据错误报告日志的历史记录策划了一个数据集。然后,我们使用支持向量机算法和术语频率-反向文档频率特征提取方法将默认错误报告分为严重或非严重类别。结果表明,为默认严重程度的错误报告建立定制模型比为所有严重程度的错误报告训练一个模型能提供更好、更可靠的结果。总体而言,所提出的日志模型优于文献中的三种模型(方法);与其他模型相比,它的 f-measure 提高了 4%,在某些项目中,它的 f-measure 提高了 11.2%。此外,我们还研究了情感分析对默认错误严重性预测的影响;结果显示没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Machine Learning Approach for Classifying the Default Bug Severity Level

A Machine Learning Approach for Classifying the Default Bug Severity Level

Bug reports (BRs) play a major role in the software maintenance process; they alert developers about the bugs discovered by the end-users. Software applications utilize bug tracking systems (BTS) to manage submitted bug reports. Recent studies showed that the majority of BRs in BTS belong to the default severity category, which does not represent their actual severity. In this paper, we propose an approach that can automatically classify default bug reports into severe or non-severe categories. We curated a dataset based on the history of bug report logs. After that, we used the Support Vector Machine algorithm and Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency feature extraction method to classify default bug reports into severe or non-severe categories. The results show that building customized models for default severity bug reports provides better and more reliable results than training one model for all severity. Overall, the proposed Log model outperformed the three models (approaches) from the literature; it achieved an improvement of up to ~ 4% f-measure compared to others, and in some projects, it achieved an improvement of 11.2% f-measure. Moreover, we investigated the impact of sentiment analysis on default bug severity prediction; the results show no noticeable influence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) partnered with Springer to publish the Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (AJSE). AJSE, which has been published by KFUPM since 1975, is a recognized national, regional and international journal that provides a great opportunity for the dissemination of research advances from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, MENA and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信