关于为 RANS 模拟扩展黎曼求解器

IF 4 3区 工程技术 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Axel Buck, Christian Mundt
{"title":"关于为 RANS 模拟扩展黎曼求解器","authors":"Axel Buck, Christian Mundt","doi":"10.1108/hff-11-2023-0708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models often perform poorly in shock/turbulence interaction regions, resulting in excessive wall heat load and incorrect representation of the separation length in shockwave/turbulent boundary layer interactions. The authors suggest that this can be traced back to inadequate numerical treatment of the inviscid fluxes. The purpose of this study is an extension to the well-known Harten, Lax, van Leer, Einfeldt (HLLE) Riemann solver to overcome this issue.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>It explicitly takes into account the broadening of waves due to the averaging procedure, which adds numerical dissipation and reduces excessive turbulence production across shocks. The scheme is derived based on the HLLE equations, and it is tested against three numerical experiments.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Sod’s shock tube case shows that the scheme succeeds in reducing turbulence amplification across shocks. A shock-free turbulent flat plate boundary layer indicates that smooth flow at moderate turbulence intensity is largely unaffected by the scheme. A shock/turbulent boundary layer interaction case with higher turbulence intensity shows that the added numerical dissipation can, however, impair the wall heat flux distribution.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The proposed scheme is motivated by implicit large eddy simulations that use numerical dissipation as subgrid-scale model. Introducing physical aspects of turbulence into the numerical treatment for RANS simulations is a novel approach.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":14263,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the extension of a Riemann solver for RANS simulations\",\"authors\":\"Axel Buck, Christian Mundt\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/hff-11-2023-0708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models often perform poorly in shock/turbulence interaction regions, resulting in excessive wall heat load and incorrect representation of the separation length in shockwave/turbulent boundary layer interactions. The authors suggest that this can be traced back to inadequate numerical treatment of the inviscid fluxes. The purpose of this study is an extension to the well-known Harten, Lax, van Leer, Einfeldt (HLLE) Riemann solver to overcome this issue.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>It explicitly takes into account the broadening of waves due to the averaging procedure, which adds numerical dissipation and reduces excessive turbulence production across shocks. The scheme is derived based on the HLLE equations, and it is tested against three numerical experiments.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Sod’s shock tube case shows that the scheme succeeds in reducing turbulence amplification across shocks. A shock-free turbulent flat plate boundary layer indicates that smooth flow at moderate turbulence intensity is largely unaffected by the scheme. A shock/turbulent boundary layer interaction case with higher turbulence intensity shows that the added numerical dissipation can, however, impair the wall heat flux distribution.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The proposed scheme is motivated by implicit large eddy simulations that use numerical dissipation as subgrid-scale model. Introducing physical aspects of turbulence into the numerical treatment for RANS simulations is a novel approach.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":14263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/hff-11-2023-0708\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/hff-11-2023-0708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯(RANS)模型在冲击波/湍流相互作用区域通常表现不佳,导致壁面热负荷过大以及在冲击波/湍流边界层相互作用中分离长度表示不正确。作者认为,这可以追溯到对不粘性通量的数值处理不当。本研究的目的是对著名的 Harten、Lax、van Leer、Einfeldt(HLLE)黎曼求解器进行扩展,以克服这一问题。该方案是基于 HLLE 方程推导出来的,并通过三个数值实验对其进行了测试。无冲击湍流平板边界层表明,中等湍流强度的平滑流动基本不受该方案的影响。在湍流强度较高的冲击/湍流边界层相互作用情况下,增加的数值耗散可能会影响壁面热通量分布。在 RANS 模拟的数值处理中引入湍流的物理方面是一种新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the extension of a Riemann solver for RANS simulations

Purpose

Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models often perform poorly in shock/turbulence interaction regions, resulting in excessive wall heat load and incorrect representation of the separation length in shockwave/turbulent boundary layer interactions. The authors suggest that this can be traced back to inadequate numerical treatment of the inviscid fluxes. The purpose of this study is an extension to the well-known Harten, Lax, van Leer, Einfeldt (HLLE) Riemann solver to overcome this issue.

Design/methodology/approach

It explicitly takes into account the broadening of waves due to the averaging procedure, which adds numerical dissipation and reduces excessive turbulence production across shocks. The scheme is derived based on the HLLE equations, and it is tested against three numerical experiments.

Findings

Sod’s shock tube case shows that the scheme succeeds in reducing turbulence amplification across shocks. A shock-free turbulent flat plate boundary layer indicates that smooth flow at moderate turbulence intensity is largely unaffected by the scheme. A shock/turbulent boundary layer interaction case with higher turbulence intensity shows that the added numerical dissipation can, however, impair the wall heat flux distribution.

Originality/value

The proposed scheme is motivated by implicit large eddy simulations that use numerical dissipation as subgrid-scale model. Introducing physical aspects of turbulence into the numerical treatment for RANS simulations is a novel approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
11.90%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of this international journal is to provide applied mathematicians, engineers and scientists engaged in computer-aided design and research in computational heat transfer and fluid dynamics, whether in academic institutions of industry, with timely and accessible information on the development, refinement and application of computer-based numerical techniques for solving problems in heat and fluid flow. - See more at: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=hff#sthash.Kf80GRt8.dpuf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信