急诊护士高级创伤教育计划的要素:改良德尔菲法

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Trauma Nursing Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000788
Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Monica Escalante Kolbuk, Claire Simon
{"title":"急诊护士高级创伤教育计划的要素:改良德尔菲法","authors":"Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Monica Escalante Kolbuk, Claire Simon","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Basic trauma education for emergency department (ED) staff is available, but there are currently no advanced trauma nursing practice standards for ED nurses.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify consensus-based elements of an advanced trauma nursing program for ED nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a modified Delphi process with three rounds of online survey data collection to ensure a large group of geographically diverse experts. Data were collected from February 2023 to May 2023. The sample for Round 1 was recruited from members of the Emergency Nurses Association reporting job titles, including trauma coordinator, trauma nursing core course instructor, and vice president of trauma services (n = 829). Participants in subsequent rounds were drawn from respondents to the initial invitation to participate (n = 131). Members of an emergency nursing research council with clinical and research expertise reviewed the results and provided expert input.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An initial sample of 131 experts identified 17 elements that were assigned a median score equivalent to \"agree/strongly agree\" (i.e., median 4/5 or 5/5) in Round 2 (n = 69). These elements were presented in Round 3 (n = 43) to determine a rank order. Critical thinking/clinical judgment was the overall priority, followed by assessment/reassessment and early recognition of trauma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency department trauma care experts identified priority content for advanced trauma education. Heterogeneity in the final ranking of components for this advanced trauma course, specifically differences by facility, regional, or demographic characteristics, suggests that training and education may not conform to a one-size-fits-all model.</p>","PeriodicalId":51329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","volume":"31 3","pages":"149-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elements of an Advanced Trauma Education Program for Emergency Nurses: A Modified Delphi Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Monica Escalante Kolbuk, Claire Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Basic trauma education for emergency department (ED) staff is available, but there are currently no advanced trauma nursing practice standards for ED nurses.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify consensus-based elements of an advanced trauma nursing program for ED nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a modified Delphi process with three rounds of online survey data collection to ensure a large group of geographically diverse experts. Data were collected from February 2023 to May 2023. The sample for Round 1 was recruited from members of the Emergency Nurses Association reporting job titles, including trauma coordinator, trauma nursing core course instructor, and vice president of trauma services (n = 829). Participants in subsequent rounds were drawn from respondents to the initial invitation to participate (n = 131). Members of an emergency nursing research council with clinical and research expertise reviewed the results and provided expert input.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An initial sample of 131 experts identified 17 elements that were assigned a median score equivalent to \\\"agree/strongly agree\\\" (i.e., median 4/5 or 5/5) in Round 2 (n = 69). These elements were presented in Round 3 (n = 43) to determine a rank order. Critical thinking/clinical judgment was the overall priority, followed by assessment/reassessment and early recognition of trauma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency department trauma care experts identified priority content for advanced trauma education. Heterogeneity in the final ranking of components for this advanced trauma course, specifically differences by facility, regional, or demographic characteristics, suggests that training and education may not conform to a one-size-fits-all model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trauma Nursing\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"149-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trauma Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000788\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000788","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为急诊科(ED)工作人员提供了基本的创伤教育,但目前还没有针对急诊科护士的高级创伤护理实践标准:本研究旨在为急诊科护士确定高级创伤护理项目的共识要素:方法: 我们采用了改良的德尔菲流程,并进行了三轮在线调查数据收集,以确保拥有一大批来自不同地域的专家。数据收集时间为 2023 年 2 月至 2023 年 5 月。第一轮的样本从急诊护士协会会员中招募,报告的职称包括创伤协调员、创伤护理核心课程讲师和创伤服务副总裁(n = 829)。随后几轮的参与者则来自最初邀请的回复者(n = 131)。具有临床和研究专长的急救护理研究委员会成员对结果进行了审核,并提供了专家意见:131 位专家的初始样本确定了 17 个要素,这些要素在第二轮(n = 69)中的中位数得分相当于 "同意/非常同意"(即中位数为 4/5 或 5/5)。这些要素在第三轮(n = 43)中进行了展示,以确定排名顺序。批判性思维/临床判断是总体优先事项,其次是评估/重新评估和早期识别创伤:急诊科创伤护理专家确定了高级创伤教育的优先内容。该高级创伤课程内容的最终排序存在差异,特别是设施、地区或人口特征的差异,这表明培训和教育可能不符合 "一刀切 "的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elements of an Advanced Trauma Education Program for Emergency Nurses: A Modified Delphi Approach.

Background: Basic trauma education for emergency department (ED) staff is available, but there are currently no advanced trauma nursing practice standards for ED nurses.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify consensus-based elements of an advanced trauma nursing program for ED nurses.

Methods: We used a modified Delphi process with three rounds of online survey data collection to ensure a large group of geographically diverse experts. Data were collected from February 2023 to May 2023. The sample for Round 1 was recruited from members of the Emergency Nurses Association reporting job titles, including trauma coordinator, trauma nursing core course instructor, and vice president of trauma services (n = 829). Participants in subsequent rounds were drawn from respondents to the initial invitation to participate (n = 131). Members of an emergency nursing research council with clinical and research expertise reviewed the results and provided expert input.

Results: An initial sample of 131 experts identified 17 elements that were assigned a median score equivalent to "agree/strongly agree" (i.e., median 4/5 or 5/5) in Round 2 (n = 69). These elements were presented in Round 3 (n = 43) to determine a rank order. Critical thinking/clinical judgment was the overall priority, followed by assessment/reassessment and early recognition of trauma.

Conclusions: Emergency department trauma care experts identified priority content for advanced trauma education. Heterogeneity in the final ranking of components for this advanced trauma course, specifically differences by facility, regional, or demographic characteristics, suggests that training and education may not conform to a one-size-fits-all model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Trauma Nursing
Journal of Trauma Nursing CRITICAL CARE MEDICINENURSING&-NURSING
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Trauma Nursing (JTN) is the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses. The Society of Trauma Nurses believes that trauma is a disease impacting patients through the continuum of care. The mission of STN is to ensure optimal trauma care through education, collaboration, leadership and membership engagement. As the official publication of the Society of Trauma Nurses, the Journal of Trauma Nursing supports the STN’s strategic goals of effective communication, education and patient advocacy with original, peer-reviewed, research and evidence-based articles and information that reflect the highest standard of collaborative care for trauma patients.​ The Journal of Trauma Nursing, through a commitment to editorial excellence, implements STN’s vision to improve practice and patient outcomes and to become the premiere global nursing organization across the trauma continuum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信