台阶性能测试评估 (STEPS):评估老年人的楼梯功能。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1519/JPT.0000000000000415
Deb Kegelmeyer, Raquel Minarsch, Katherine Marita, Audrey Hoffmeister, Gabrielle Schnaterbeck, Timothy Wohl, Yevgeniya Gokun, Anne Kloos
{"title":"台阶性能测试评估 (STEPS):评估老年人的楼梯功能。","authors":"Deb Kegelmeyer, Raquel Minarsch, Katherine Marita, Audrey Hoffmeister, Gabrielle Schnaterbeck, Timothy Wohl, Yevgeniya Gokun, Anne Kloos","doi":"10.1519/JPT.0000000000000415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Stair negotiation is crucial for functional independence and is a leading cause of fall-related injuries in older adults. The Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS) is a quick and easily administered outcome measure for assessing stair negotiation. This study investigated the reliability and concurrent content validity of the STEPS test to determine its usefulness in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-two community-dwelling older adults (mean age 81.2 years, 51 females) were assessed on the STEPS test, Timed Up and Go (TUG), 5-times sit to stand (5XSTS), stair self-efficacy (SSE) questionnaire, and time to ascend and descend stairs. Participants repeated the STEPS test 7 to 14 days later for intrarater reliability by the same rater. Spearman rank and intraclass correlations were used to determine the association of measures and intrarater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The mean STEPS score was 15.6 (SD = 3.7) out of 20. The STEPS total score demonstrated excellent intra- and interrater reliability. It had moderate to good and significant correlations with TUG, 5XSTS, SSE, and time to ascend and descend measures. Faster performance on the 5XSTS, TUG, and time to ascend and descend correlated with better performance on the STEPS test, indicating validity for assessing balance and mobility during stair negotiation in older adults. Lower SSE correlated with lower observer ratings of performance on stairs (STEPS scores), indicating agreement between participant reports of self-efficacy and observer ratings of performance. Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs items that demonstrated the most frequent loss of points were balance (use of handrail), step continuity, foot placement, and self-propulsion (ascent only).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessment of older adults' safety and performance on stairs is vital given the increased difficulty of stair navigation and the high risk for injurious falls in this population. This study demonstrates that the STEPS test is a reliable and valid outcome measure for assessing stair performance in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":49035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"214-221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS): Assessing Stair Function in Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Deb Kegelmeyer, Raquel Minarsch, Katherine Marita, Audrey Hoffmeister, Gabrielle Schnaterbeck, Timothy Wohl, Yevgeniya Gokun, Anne Kloos\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JPT.0000000000000415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Stair negotiation is crucial for functional independence and is a leading cause of fall-related injuries in older adults. The Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS) is a quick and easily administered outcome measure for assessing stair negotiation. This study investigated the reliability and concurrent content validity of the STEPS test to determine its usefulness in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-two community-dwelling older adults (mean age 81.2 years, 51 females) were assessed on the STEPS test, Timed Up and Go (TUG), 5-times sit to stand (5XSTS), stair self-efficacy (SSE) questionnaire, and time to ascend and descend stairs. Participants repeated the STEPS test 7 to 14 days later for intrarater reliability by the same rater. Spearman rank and intraclass correlations were used to determine the association of measures and intrarater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The mean STEPS score was 15.6 (SD = 3.7) out of 20. The STEPS total score demonstrated excellent intra- and interrater reliability. It had moderate to good and significant correlations with TUG, 5XSTS, SSE, and time to ascend and descend measures. Faster performance on the 5XSTS, TUG, and time to ascend and descend correlated with better performance on the STEPS test, indicating validity for assessing balance and mobility during stair negotiation in older adults. Lower SSE correlated with lower observer ratings of performance on stairs (STEPS scores), indicating agreement between participant reports of self-efficacy and observer ratings of performance. Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs items that demonstrated the most frequent loss of points were balance (use of handrail), step continuity, foot placement, and self-propulsion (ascent only).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessment of older adults' safety and performance on stairs is vital given the increased difficulty of stair navigation and the high risk for injurious falls in this population. This study demonstrates that the STEPS test is a reliable and valid outcome measure for assessing stair performance in older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"214-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000415\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:爬楼梯对老年人的功能独立性至关重要,也是老年人摔倒受伤的主要原因。楼梯上表现的阶梯测试评估(STEPS)是一种快速、易于管理的评估楼梯协商能力的结果测量方法。本研究调查了 STEPS 测试的可靠性和并发内容有效性,以确定其对老年人的实用性:对 82 名居住在社区的老年人(平均年龄 81.2 岁,51 名女性)进行了 STEPS 测试、定时上下楼 (TUG)、5 次坐立 (5XSTS)、楼梯自我效能 (SSE) 问卷以及上下楼时间的评估。参与者在 7-14 天后重复进行 STEPS 测试,由同一测试者进行测试,以确保测试结果的内在可靠性。斯皮尔曼等级相关性和类内相关性用于确定测量和内部评分者可靠性之间的关联:STEPS 的平均得分为 15.6(SD = 3.7)(满分 20 分)。STEPS 总分在研究者内部和研究者之间表现出极佳的可靠性。它与 TUG、5XSTS、SSE 以及上行和下行时间的测量结果具有中度到良好的显著相关性。在 5XSTS、TUG 和上下楼时间上的较快表现与在 STEPS 测试中的较好表现相关,这表明 STEPS 测试对于评估老年人在上下楼梯过程中的平衡和移动能力是有效的。较低的自我效能感与较低的观察者楼梯表现评分(STEPS 分数)相关,表明参与者的自我效能感报告与观察者的表现评分之间存在一致性。台阶测试楼梯表现评估中失分最多的项目是平衡(扶手的使用)、台阶的连续性、脚的位置和自我推动力(仅上升):评估老年人在楼梯上的安全和表现至关重要,因为在楼梯上行走的难度增加,而且老年人摔倒受伤的风险很高。这项研究表明,STEPS 测试是评估老年人楼梯表现的可靠、有效的结果测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS): Assessing Stair Function in Older Adults.

Background and purpose: Stair negotiation is crucial for functional independence and is a leading cause of fall-related injuries in older adults. The Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS) is a quick and easily administered outcome measure for assessing stair negotiation. This study investigated the reliability and concurrent content validity of the STEPS test to determine its usefulness in older adults.

Methods: Eighty-two community-dwelling older adults (mean age 81.2 years, 51 females) were assessed on the STEPS test, Timed Up and Go (TUG), 5-times sit to stand (5XSTS), stair self-efficacy (SSE) questionnaire, and time to ascend and descend stairs. Participants repeated the STEPS test 7 to 14 days later for intrarater reliability by the same rater. Spearman rank and intraclass correlations were used to determine the association of measures and intrarater reliability.

Results and discussion: The mean STEPS score was 15.6 (SD = 3.7) out of 20. The STEPS total score demonstrated excellent intra- and interrater reliability. It had moderate to good and significant correlations with TUG, 5XSTS, SSE, and time to ascend and descend measures. Faster performance on the 5XSTS, TUG, and time to ascend and descend correlated with better performance on the STEPS test, indicating validity for assessing balance and mobility during stair negotiation in older adults. Lower SSE correlated with lower observer ratings of performance on stairs (STEPS scores), indicating agreement between participant reports of self-efficacy and observer ratings of performance. Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs items that demonstrated the most frequent loss of points were balance (use of handrail), step continuity, foot placement, and self-propulsion (ascent only).

Conclusions: Assessment of older adults' safety and performance on stairs is vital given the increased difficulty of stair navigation and the high risk for injurious falls in this population. This study demonstrates that the STEPS test is a reliable and valid outcome measure for assessing stair performance in older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy is the leading source of clinically applicable evidence for achieving optimal health, wellness, mobility, and physical function across the continuum of health status for the aging adult. The mission of the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy is building a community that advances the profession of physical therapy to optimize the experience of aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信