Hanna Bugler , Rodrigo Berto , Roberto Souza , Ashley D. Harris
{"title":"利用复值卷积神经网络对 GABA 编辑的磁共振光谱进行频率和相位校正。","authors":"Hanna Bugler , Rodrigo Berto , Roberto Souza , Ashley D. Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2024.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the significance of complex-valued inputs and complex-valued convolutions compared to real-valued inputs and real-valued convolutions in convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for frequency and phase correction (FPC) of GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An ablation study using simulated data was performed to determine the most effective input (real or complex) and convolution type (real or complex) to predict frequency and phase shifts in GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS data using CNNs. The best CNN model was subsequently compared using both simulated and <em>in vivo</em> data to two recently proposed deep learning (DL) methods for FPC of GABA-edited MRS. All methods were trained using the same experimental setup and evaluated using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and linewidth of the GABA peak, choline artifact, and by visually assessing the reconstructed final difference spectrum. Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ablation study showed that using complex values for the input represented by real and imaginary channels in our model input tensor, with complex convolutions was most effective for FPC. Overall, in the comparative study using simulated data, our CC-CNN model (that received complex-valued inputs with complex convolutions) outperformed the other models as evaluated by the mean absolute error.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results indicate that the optimal CNN configuration for GABA-edited MRS FPC uses a complex-valued input and complex convolutions. Overall, this model outperformed existing DL models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 186-195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24001577/pdfft?md5=beabc82703021a10b9a1b32c32548a80&pid=1-s2.0-S0730725X24001577-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency and phase correction of GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy using complex-valued convolutional neural networks\",\"authors\":\"Hanna Bugler , Rodrigo Berto , Roberto Souza , Ashley D. Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mri.2024.05.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the significance of complex-valued inputs and complex-valued convolutions compared to real-valued inputs and real-valued convolutions in convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for frequency and phase correction (FPC) of GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An ablation study using simulated data was performed to determine the most effective input (real or complex) and convolution type (real or complex) to predict frequency and phase shifts in GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS data using CNNs. The best CNN model was subsequently compared using both simulated and <em>in vivo</em> data to two recently proposed deep learning (DL) methods for FPC of GABA-edited MRS. All methods were trained using the same experimental setup and evaluated using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and linewidth of the GABA peak, choline artifact, and by visually assessing the reconstructed final difference spectrum. Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ablation study showed that using complex values for the input represented by real and imaginary channels in our model input tensor, with complex convolutions was most effective for FPC. Overall, in the comparative study using simulated data, our CC-CNN model (that received complex-valued inputs with complex convolutions) outperformed the other models as evaluated by the mean absolute error.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results indicate that the optimal CNN configuration for GABA-edited MRS FPC uses a complex-valued input and complex convolutions. Overall, this model outperformed existing DL models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 186-195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24001577/pdfft?md5=beabc82703021a10b9a1b32c32548a80&pid=1-s2.0-S0730725X24001577-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24001577\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24001577","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Frequency and phase correction of GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy using complex-valued convolutional neural networks
Purpose
To determine the significance of complex-valued inputs and complex-valued convolutions compared to real-valued inputs and real-valued convolutions in convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for frequency and phase correction (FPC) of GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data.
Methods
An ablation study using simulated data was performed to determine the most effective input (real or complex) and convolution type (real or complex) to predict frequency and phase shifts in GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS data using CNNs. The best CNN model was subsequently compared using both simulated and in vivo data to two recently proposed deep learning (DL) methods for FPC of GABA-edited MRS. All methods were trained using the same experimental setup and evaluated using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and linewidth of the GABA peak, choline artifact, and by visually assessing the reconstructed final difference spectrum. Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Results
The ablation study showed that using complex values for the input represented by real and imaginary channels in our model input tensor, with complex convolutions was most effective for FPC. Overall, in the comparative study using simulated data, our CC-CNN model (that received complex-valued inputs with complex convolutions) outperformed the other models as evaluated by the mean absolute error.
Conclusion
Our results indicate that the optimal CNN configuration for GABA-edited MRS FPC uses a complex-valued input and complex convolutions. Overall, this model outperformed existing DL models.
期刊介绍:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.