环境 DNA 代谢编码能够可靠地恢复节肢动物之间的互动,而这些互动经常可以通过花卉视频记录观察到

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1002/edn3.550
Manuel Stothut, Damaris Kühne, Vanessa Ströbele, Lisa Mahla, Sven Künzel, Henrik Krehenwinkel
{"title":"环境 DNA 代谢编码能够可靠地恢复节肢动物之间的互动,而这些互动经常可以通过花卉视频记录观察到","authors":"Manuel Stothut,&nbsp;Damaris Kühne,&nbsp;Vanessa Ströbele,&nbsp;Lisa Mahla,&nbsp;Sven Künzel,&nbsp;Henrik Krehenwinkel","doi":"10.1002/edn3.550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding promises to be a cost- and time-efficient monitoring tool to detect interactions of arthropods with plants. However, observation-based verification of the eDNA-derived data is still required to confirm the reliability of those detections, i.e., to verify whether the arthropods have previously interacted with the plant. Here, we conducted a comparative analysis of the performance of eDNA metabarcoding and video camera observations to detect arthropod communities associated with sunflowers (<i>Helianthus annuus</i>, L.). We compared the taxonomic composition, interaction type, and diversity by testing for an effect of arthropod interaction time and occupancy on successful taxon recovery by eDNA. We also tested if prewashing of the flowers successfully removed eDNA deposition from before the video camera recording, thus enabling a reset of the community for standardized monitoring. We find that eDNA and video camera observations recovered distinct communities, with about a quarter of the arthropod families overlapping. However, the overlapping taxa comprised ~90% of the interactions observed by the video camera. Interestingly, eDNA metabarcoding recovered more unique families than the video cameras, but approximately two-thirds of those unique observations were of rare species. The eDNA-derived families were biased toward plant sap-suckers, showing that such species may deposit more eDNA than, for example, transient pollinators. We also find that prewashing of the flower heads did not suffice to remove all eDNA traces, suggesting that eDNA on plants may be more temporally stable than previously thought. Our work highlights the great potential of eDNA as a tool to detect plant-arthropod interactions, particularly for specialized and frequently interacting taxa.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.550","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental DNA metabarcoding reliably recovers arthropod interactions which are frequently observed by video recordings of flowers\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Stothut,&nbsp;Damaris Kühne,&nbsp;Vanessa Ströbele,&nbsp;Lisa Mahla,&nbsp;Sven Künzel,&nbsp;Henrik Krehenwinkel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding promises to be a cost- and time-efficient monitoring tool to detect interactions of arthropods with plants. However, observation-based verification of the eDNA-derived data is still required to confirm the reliability of those detections, i.e., to verify whether the arthropods have previously interacted with the plant. Here, we conducted a comparative analysis of the performance of eDNA metabarcoding and video camera observations to detect arthropod communities associated with sunflowers (<i>Helianthus annuus</i>, L.). We compared the taxonomic composition, interaction type, and diversity by testing for an effect of arthropod interaction time and occupancy on successful taxon recovery by eDNA. We also tested if prewashing of the flowers successfully removed eDNA deposition from before the video camera recording, thus enabling a reset of the community for standardized monitoring. We find that eDNA and video camera observations recovered distinct communities, with about a quarter of the arthropod families overlapping. However, the overlapping taxa comprised ~90% of the interactions observed by the video camera. Interestingly, eDNA metabarcoding recovered more unique families than the video cameras, but approximately two-thirds of those unique observations were of rare species. The eDNA-derived families were biased toward plant sap-suckers, showing that such species may deposit more eDNA than, for example, transient pollinators. We also find that prewashing of the flower heads did not suffice to remove all eDNA traces, suggesting that eDNA on plants may be more temporally stable than previously thought. Our work highlights the great potential of eDNA as a tool to detect plant-arthropod interactions, particularly for specialized and frequently interacting taxa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.550\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境 DNA(eDNA)代谢编码有望成为检测节肢动物与植物相互作用的一种经济、省时的监测工具。然而,仍需要对 eDNA 衍生数据进行观察验证,以确认这些检测结果的可靠性,即验证节肢动物以前是否与植物发生过相互作用。在此,我们对检测向日葵(Helianthus annuus, L.)相关节肢动物群落的 eDNA 代谢编码和摄像机观察的性能进行了比较分析。我们比较了分类组成、互动类型和多样性,测试了节肢动物互动时间和占用率对通过 eDNA 成功恢复分类群的影响。我们还测试了预洗花朵是否能成功去除摄像机拍摄前沉积的 eDNA,从而重置群落以进行标准化监测。我们发现,eDNA 和摄像机的观测结果发现了不同的群落,其中约有四分之一的节肢动物科有重叠。然而,在摄像机观察到的相互作用中,重叠类群占了约 90%。有趣的是,与摄像机相比,eDNA 代谢编码发现了更多独特的科,但这些独特的观察结果中约有三分之二是稀有物种。eDNA 衍生的科偏向于植物吸液者,这表明这类物种可能比短暂传粉者等沉积更多的 eDNA。我们还发现,预先清洗花头并不足以去除所有 eDNA 痕迹,这表明植物上的 eDNA 可能比以前认为的更具时间稳定性。我们的工作凸显了 eDNA 作为检测植物与节肢动物相互作用的工具的巨大潜力,特别是对于专门化和频繁相互作用的类群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Environmental DNA metabarcoding reliably recovers arthropod interactions which are frequently observed by video recordings of flowers

Environmental DNA metabarcoding reliably recovers arthropod interactions which are frequently observed by video recordings of flowers

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding promises to be a cost- and time-efficient monitoring tool to detect interactions of arthropods with plants. However, observation-based verification of the eDNA-derived data is still required to confirm the reliability of those detections, i.e., to verify whether the arthropods have previously interacted with the plant. Here, we conducted a comparative analysis of the performance of eDNA metabarcoding and video camera observations to detect arthropod communities associated with sunflowers (Helianthus annuus, L.). We compared the taxonomic composition, interaction type, and diversity by testing for an effect of arthropod interaction time and occupancy on successful taxon recovery by eDNA. We also tested if prewashing of the flowers successfully removed eDNA deposition from before the video camera recording, thus enabling a reset of the community for standardized monitoring. We find that eDNA and video camera observations recovered distinct communities, with about a quarter of the arthropod families overlapping. However, the overlapping taxa comprised ~90% of the interactions observed by the video camera. Interestingly, eDNA metabarcoding recovered more unique families than the video cameras, but approximately two-thirds of those unique observations were of rare species. The eDNA-derived families were biased toward plant sap-suckers, showing that such species may deposit more eDNA than, for example, transient pollinators. We also find that prewashing of the flower heads did not suffice to remove all eDNA traces, suggesting that eDNA on plants may be more temporally stable than previously thought. Our work highlights the great potential of eDNA as a tool to detect plant-arthropod interactions, particularly for specialized and frequently interacting taxa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信