[病人预先指示和持久授权书的使用频率和障碍:姑息关怀服务前瞻性观察研究的结果]。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Benedict Mathias Breen, Claudia Flohr, Heike Wendt, Katharina Chalk, Ulrike Haase, Christiane Hartog, Sascha Tafelski
{"title":"[病人预先指示和持久授权书的使用频率和障碍:姑息关怀服务前瞻性观察研究的结果]。","authors":"Benedict Mathias Breen, Claudia Flohr, Heike Wendt, Katharina Chalk, Ulrike Haase, Christiane Hartog, Sascha Tafelski","doi":"10.1007/s00063-024-01149-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advance directive and lasting power of attorney are instruments to strengthen patients' autonomy. A hospital-based palliative care consultation service can advise patients and family members about these instruments. This study investigates the need for such consultation among patients with life-limiting illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study on intensive and non-intensive care units includes patients with a request for palliative care consultation. Patient-related factors were evaluated for their possible association with the presence or absence of advance directives or power of attorney. In addition, focus group interviews with members of the palliative care consultation team were carried out to identify barriers which prevent patients from drawing up such documents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241 oncological and 53 non-oncological patients were included with a median age of 67 years; 69 (23%) patients were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Overall, 98 (33%) patients had advance directives, and 133 (45%) had determined a legal health care proxy in advance. A total of 52 patients died in hospital (17.7%). Only age and relationship status were associated with directives. In interviews, the following barriers were identified: information deficit, concern regarding discontinuation of treatment, loss of autonomy and wish to avoid a burden for the family.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority in this severely ill patient population lack advance directives. In order to remove barriers, more effective information and counseling is required about such directives. In particular, guidance should include potential clinical situations in which such directives are potentially beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Frequency and barriers to the patient advanced directive and lasting power of attorney: findings from a prospective observation study in palliative care services].\",\"authors\":\"Benedict Mathias Breen, Claudia Flohr, Heike Wendt, Katharina Chalk, Ulrike Haase, Christiane Hartog, Sascha Tafelski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00063-024-01149-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advance directive and lasting power of attorney are instruments to strengthen patients' autonomy. A hospital-based palliative care consultation service can advise patients and family members about these instruments. This study investigates the need for such consultation among patients with life-limiting illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study on intensive and non-intensive care units includes patients with a request for palliative care consultation. Patient-related factors were evaluated for their possible association with the presence or absence of advance directives or power of attorney. In addition, focus group interviews with members of the palliative care consultation team were carried out to identify barriers which prevent patients from drawing up such documents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241 oncological and 53 non-oncological patients were included with a median age of 67 years; 69 (23%) patients were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Overall, 98 (33%) patients had advance directives, and 133 (45%) had determined a legal health care proxy in advance. A total of 52 patients died in hospital (17.7%). Only age and relationship status were associated with directives. In interviews, the following barriers were identified: information deficit, concern regarding discontinuation of treatment, loss of autonomy and wish to avoid a burden for the family.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority in this severely ill patient population lack advance directives. In order to remove barriers, more effective information and counseling is required about such directives. In particular, guidance should include potential clinical situations in which such directives are potentially beneficial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01149-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01149-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预先指示和持久授权书是加强病人自主权的工具。以医院为基础的姑息关怀咨询服务可以为患者和家属提供有关这些工具的建议。本研究调查了患有局限生命疾病的患者对此类咨询的需求:这项前瞻性观察研究的对象是重症监护病房和非重症监护病房中提出姑息关怀咨询请求的患者。对患者相关因素进行了评估,以确定这些因素是否与是否存在预先指示或授权书有关。此外,还对姑息关怀咨询团队的成员进行了焦点小组访谈,以确定阻碍患者起草此类文件的障碍:共纳入 241 名肿瘤患者和 53 名非肿瘤患者,中位年龄为 67 岁;69 名(23%)患者在重症监护室(ICU)接受治疗。总体而言,98 名(33%)患者有预先医疗指示,133 名(45%)患者事先确定了合法的医疗代理。共有 52 名患者死于医院(17.7%)。只有年龄和关系状况与预嘱有关。在访谈中,我们发现了以下障碍:信息匮乏、对中止治疗的担忧、丧失自主权以及希望避免给家人带来负担:结论:重症患者中的大多数人缺乏预先医疗指示。为了消除障碍,需要就此类预嘱提供更有效的信息和咨询。特别是,指导内容应包括此类预嘱可能有益的潜在临床情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Frequency and barriers to the patient advanced directive and lasting power of attorney: findings from a prospective observation study in palliative care services].

Background: The advance directive and lasting power of attorney are instruments to strengthen patients' autonomy. A hospital-based palliative care consultation service can advise patients and family members about these instruments. This study investigates the need for such consultation among patients with life-limiting illness.

Methods: This prospective observational study on intensive and non-intensive care units includes patients with a request for palliative care consultation. Patient-related factors were evaluated for their possible association with the presence or absence of advance directives or power of attorney. In addition, focus group interviews with members of the palliative care consultation team were carried out to identify barriers which prevent patients from drawing up such documents.

Results: A total of 241 oncological and 53 non-oncological patients were included with a median age of 67 years; 69 (23%) patients were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Overall, 98 (33%) patients had advance directives, and 133 (45%) had determined a legal health care proxy in advance. A total of 52 patients died in hospital (17.7%). Only age and relationship status were associated with directives. In interviews, the following barriers were identified: information deficit, concern regarding discontinuation of treatment, loss of autonomy and wish to avoid a burden for the family.

Conclusion: The majority in this severely ill patient population lack advance directives. In order to remove barriers, more effective information and counseling is required about such directives. In particular, guidance should include potential clinical situations in which such directives are potentially beneficial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信