非洲的 COVID-19 疫苗接种战略:利用数学模型为政策提供信息的范围审查。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tropical Medicine & International Health Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1111/tmi.13994
Sylvia K Ofori, Emmanuelle A Dankwa, Eve Hiyori Estrada, Xinyi Hua, Teresia N Kimani, Carrie G Wade, Caroline O Buckee, Megan B Murray, Bethany L Hedt-Gauthier
{"title":"非洲的 COVID-19 疫苗接种战略:利用数学模型为政策提供信息的范围审查。","authors":"Sylvia K Ofori, Emmanuelle A Dankwa, Eve Hiyori Estrada, Xinyi Hua, Teresia N Kimani, Carrie G Wade, Caroline O Buckee, Megan B Murray, Bethany L Hedt-Gauthier","doi":"10.1111/tmi.13994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mathematical models are vital tools to understand transmission dynamics and assess the impact of interventions to mitigate COVID-19. However, historically, their use in Africa has been limited. In this scoping review, we assess how mathematical models were used to study COVID-19 vaccination to potentially inform pandemic planning and response in Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched six electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Global Health, MathSciNet and Africa-Wide NiPAD, using keywords to identify articles focused on the use of mathematical modelling studies of COVID-19 vaccination in Africa that were published as of October 2022. We extracted the details on the country, author affiliation, characteristics of models, policy intent and heterogeneity factors. We assessed quality using 21-point scale criteria on model characteristics and content of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search yielded 462 articles, of which 32 were included based on the eligibility criteria. Nineteen (59%) studies had a first author affiliated with an African country. Of the 32 included studies, 30 (94%) were compartmental models. By country, most studies were about or included South Africa (n = 12, 37%), followed by Morocco (n = 6, 19%) and Ethiopia (n = 5, 16%). Most studies (n = 19, 59%) assessed the impact of increasing vaccination coverage on COVID-19 burden. Half (n = 16, 50%) had policy intent: prioritising or selecting interventions, pandemic planning and response, vaccine distribution and optimisation strategies and understanding transmission dynamics of COVID-19. Fourteen studies (44%) were of medium quality and eight (25%) were of high quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While decision-makers could draw vital insights from the evidence generated from mathematical modelling to inform policy, we found that there was limited use of such models exploring vaccination impacts for COVID-19 in Africa. The disparity can be addressed by scaling up mathematical modelling training, increasing collaborative opportunities between modellers and policymakers, and increasing access to funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":23962,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","volume":" ","pages":"466-476"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 vaccination strategies in Africa: A scoping review of the use of mathematical models to inform policy.\",\"authors\":\"Sylvia K Ofori, Emmanuelle A Dankwa, Eve Hiyori Estrada, Xinyi Hua, Teresia N Kimani, Carrie G Wade, Caroline O Buckee, Megan B Murray, Bethany L Hedt-Gauthier\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tmi.13994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mathematical models are vital tools to understand transmission dynamics and assess the impact of interventions to mitigate COVID-19. However, historically, their use in Africa has been limited. In this scoping review, we assess how mathematical models were used to study COVID-19 vaccination to potentially inform pandemic planning and response in Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched six electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Global Health, MathSciNet and Africa-Wide NiPAD, using keywords to identify articles focused on the use of mathematical modelling studies of COVID-19 vaccination in Africa that were published as of October 2022. We extracted the details on the country, author affiliation, characteristics of models, policy intent and heterogeneity factors. We assessed quality using 21-point scale criteria on model characteristics and content of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search yielded 462 articles, of which 32 were included based on the eligibility criteria. Nineteen (59%) studies had a first author affiliated with an African country. Of the 32 included studies, 30 (94%) were compartmental models. By country, most studies were about or included South Africa (n = 12, 37%), followed by Morocco (n = 6, 19%) and Ethiopia (n = 5, 16%). Most studies (n = 19, 59%) assessed the impact of increasing vaccination coverage on COVID-19 burden. Half (n = 16, 50%) had policy intent: prioritising or selecting interventions, pandemic planning and response, vaccine distribution and optimisation strategies and understanding transmission dynamics of COVID-19. Fourteen studies (44%) were of medium quality and eight (25%) were of high quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While decision-makers could draw vital insights from the evidence generated from mathematical modelling to inform policy, we found that there was limited use of such models exploring vaccination impacts for COVID-19 in Africa. The disparity can be addressed by scaling up mathematical modelling training, increasing collaborative opportunities between modellers and policymakers, and increasing access to funding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Medicine & International Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"466-476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Medicine & International Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13994\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13994","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:数学模型是了解传播动态和评估减缓 COVID-19 干预措施影响的重要工具。然而,从历史上看,数学模型在非洲的应用非常有限。在这篇范围综述中,我们评估了如何使用数学模型来研究 COVID-19 疫苗接种,从而为非洲的大流行规划和应对措施提供潜在信息:我们检索了六个电子数据库:方法:我们检索了六个电子数据库:MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、Global Health、MathSciNet 和 Africa-Wide NiPAD,并使用关键字查找了截至 2022 年 10 月发表的有关在非洲使用数学模型研究 COVID-19 疫苗接种的文章。我们提取了有关国家、作者所属单位、模型特征、政策意图和异质性因素的详细信息。我们采用 21 分制标准对研究的模型特征和内容进行了质量评估:文献检索共获得 462 篇文章,其中 32 篇根据资格标准被纳入。19项(59%)研究的第一作者隶属于非洲国家。在纳入的 32 项研究中,30 项(94%)是分区模型。从国家来看,大多数研究涉及或包括南非(12 项,占 37%),其次是摩洛哥(6 项,占 19%)和埃塞俄比亚(5 项,占 16%)。大多数研究(n = 19,59%)评估了提高疫苗接种覆盖率对 COVID-19 负担的影响。半数研究(n = 16,50%)具有政策意图:优先考虑或选择干预措施、大流行规划和响应、疫苗分配和优化策略以及了解 COVID-19 的传播动态。14项研究(44%)质量中等,8项研究(25%)质量较高:虽然决策者可以从数学建模产生的证据中汲取重要的见解,为制定政策提供依据,但我们发现,在非洲探索 COVID-19 疫苗接种影响的此类模型使用有限。可以通过扩大数学建模培训规模、增加建模者与决策者之间的合作机会以及增加获得资金的途径来解决这一差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 vaccination strategies in Africa: A scoping review of the use of mathematical models to inform policy.

Objective: Mathematical models are vital tools to understand transmission dynamics and assess the impact of interventions to mitigate COVID-19. However, historically, their use in Africa has been limited. In this scoping review, we assess how mathematical models were used to study COVID-19 vaccination to potentially inform pandemic planning and response in Africa.

Methods: We searched six electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Global Health, MathSciNet and Africa-Wide NiPAD, using keywords to identify articles focused on the use of mathematical modelling studies of COVID-19 vaccination in Africa that were published as of October 2022. We extracted the details on the country, author affiliation, characteristics of models, policy intent and heterogeneity factors. We assessed quality using 21-point scale criteria on model characteristics and content of the studies.

Results: The literature search yielded 462 articles, of which 32 were included based on the eligibility criteria. Nineteen (59%) studies had a first author affiliated with an African country. Of the 32 included studies, 30 (94%) were compartmental models. By country, most studies were about or included South Africa (n = 12, 37%), followed by Morocco (n = 6, 19%) and Ethiopia (n = 5, 16%). Most studies (n = 19, 59%) assessed the impact of increasing vaccination coverage on COVID-19 burden. Half (n = 16, 50%) had policy intent: prioritising or selecting interventions, pandemic planning and response, vaccine distribution and optimisation strategies and understanding transmission dynamics of COVID-19. Fourteen studies (44%) were of medium quality and eight (25%) were of high quality.

Conclusions: While decision-makers could draw vital insights from the evidence generated from mathematical modelling to inform policy, we found that there was limited use of such models exploring vaccination impacts for COVID-19 in Africa. The disparity can be addressed by scaling up mathematical modelling training, increasing collaborative opportunities between modellers and policymakers, and increasing access to funding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Tropical Medicine & International Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tropical Medicine & International Health is published on behalf of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Foundation Tropical Medicine and International Health, Belgian Institute of Tropical Medicine and Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine. Tropical Medicine & International Health is the official journal of the Federation of European Societies for Tropical Medicine and International Health (FESTMIH).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信