Claudio A B Bianchetti, Fabio Saccardin, Andreas Filippi
{"title":"含片表面质地、味道和酸度对唾液流速的影响:健康受试者的交叉临床前试验。","authors":"Claudio A B Bianchetti, Fabio Saccardin, Andreas Filippi","doi":"10.61872/sdj-2024-02-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dry mouth is a multifaceted condition which is caused by reduced salivary secretion. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of different lozenge surface textures, tastes and acidity levels on stimulated salivary secretion for increased oral moistening in participants without hyposalivation. This randomized, double-blind, clinical crossover trial with before and after comparison involved 33 healthy volunteers. Five lozenges, including a baseline control (C), apple (A), sour (S), sour apple (SA) and granular pectin (P) were tested on five different days with all the subjects. Salivary flow, pH value, and subjective feeling (visual analog scale) were measured before and after consuming the lozenge each day. Throughout all trial days the unstimulated whole salivary flow (UWSF) averaged 0.65 ± 0.26 ml/min. Lozenges S, SA, and P showed higher stimulated whole salivary flow (SWSF) than C (P < 0.001) by more than 0.5 ml/min. Lozenge P, with a rough surface, demonstrated the highest difference between UWSF and SWSF, 2.41 ± 0.69 ml/min. The stimulated saliva with the lozenges containing acidifiers (S, SA and P) was more than 1.4 pH units lower compared to lozenges C and A (P < 0.001). Subjects reported the strongest subjective feeling of increased saliva with lozenges SA and P. Overall lozenges SA and P provided the best objective results in enhancing salivary flow rate and subjective feeling of increased salivary flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":38153,"journal":{"name":"Swiss dental journal","volume":"134 2","pages":"72-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of lozenge surface texture, taste and acidity on salivary flow rate: A crossover preclinical trial in healthy subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Claudio A B Bianchetti, Fabio Saccardin, Andreas Filippi\",\"doi\":\"10.61872/sdj-2024-02-05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dry mouth is a multifaceted condition which is caused by reduced salivary secretion. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of different lozenge surface textures, tastes and acidity levels on stimulated salivary secretion for increased oral moistening in participants without hyposalivation. This randomized, double-blind, clinical crossover trial with before and after comparison involved 33 healthy volunteers. Five lozenges, including a baseline control (C), apple (A), sour (S), sour apple (SA) and granular pectin (P) were tested on five different days with all the subjects. Salivary flow, pH value, and subjective feeling (visual analog scale) were measured before and after consuming the lozenge each day. Throughout all trial days the unstimulated whole salivary flow (UWSF) averaged 0.65 ± 0.26 ml/min. Lozenges S, SA, and P showed higher stimulated whole salivary flow (SWSF) than C (P < 0.001) by more than 0.5 ml/min. Lozenge P, with a rough surface, demonstrated the highest difference between UWSF and SWSF, 2.41 ± 0.69 ml/min. The stimulated saliva with the lozenges containing acidifiers (S, SA and P) was more than 1.4 pH units lower compared to lozenges C and A (P < 0.001). Subjects reported the strongest subjective feeling of increased saliva with lozenges SA and P. Overall lozenges SA and P provided the best objective results in enhancing salivary flow rate and subjective feeling of increased salivary flow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss dental journal\",\"volume\":\"134 2\",\"pages\":\"72-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2024-02-05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2024-02-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
口干是一种由唾液分泌减少引起的多方面疾病。本研究旨在评估和比较不同锭剂表面质地、口味和酸度对刺激唾液分泌以增加口腔湿润的效果,受试者不存在唾液分泌过少的情况。这项随机、双盲、前后对比的临床交叉试验涉及 33 名健康志愿者。所有受试者在五个不同的日子里接受了五种锭剂的测试,包括基线对照(C)、苹果(A)、酸(S)、酸苹果(SA)和颗粒果胶(P)。每天在食用菱形糖前后测量唾液流量、pH 值和主观感觉(视觉模拟量表)。在所有试验日中,未刺激全唾液流量(UWSF)平均为 0.65 ± 0.26 毫升/分钟。S、SA 和 P 润喉糖的刺激全唾液流量(SWSF)比 C 润喉糖高(P < 0.001)0.5 毫升/分钟以上。表面粗糙的 P 润喉糖的全唾液流量(UWSF)和全唾液流量(SWSF)之间的差异最大,为 2.41 ± 0.69 毫升/分钟。与 C 和 A 相比,含有酸味剂的含片(S、SA 和 P)刺激唾液的 pH 值低 1.4 个单位以上(P < 0.001)。总体而言,SA 和 P 润喉糖在提高唾液流速和增加唾液流量的主观感觉方面提供了最佳的客观效果。
Effect of lozenge surface texture, taste and acidity on salivary flow rate: A crossover preclinical trial in healthy subjects.
Dry mouth is a multifaceted condition which is caused by reduced salivary secretion. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of different lozenge surface textures, tastes and acidity levels on stimulated salivary secretion for increased oral moistening in participants without hyposalivation. This randomized, double-blind, clinical crossover trial with before and after comparison involved 33 healthy volunteers. Five lozenges, including a baseline control (C), apple (A), sour (S), sour apple (SA) and granular pectin (P) were tested on five different days with all the subjects. Salivary flow, pH value, and subjective feeling (visual analog scale) were measured before and after consuming the lozenge each day. Throughout all trial days the unstimulated whole salivary flow (UWSF) averaged 0.65 ± 0.26 ml/min. Lozenges S, SA, and P showed higher stimulated whole salivary flow (SWSF) than C (P < 0.001) by more than 0.5 ml/min. Lozenge P, with a rough surface, demonstrated the highest difference between UWSF and SWSF, 2.41 ± 0.69 ml/min. The stimulated saliva with the lozenges containing acidifiers (S, SA and P) was more than 1.4 pH units lower compared to lozenges C and A (P < 0.001). Subjects reported the strongest subjective feeling of increased saliva with lozenges SA and P. Overall lozenges SA and P provided the best objective results in enhancing salivary flow rate and subjective feeling of increased salivary flow.
期刊介绍:
Fondé en 1891 et lu par tous les médecins-dentistes ou presque qui exercent en Suisse, le SWISS DENTAL JOURNAL SSO est l’organe de publication scientifique de la Société suisse des médecins-dentistes SSO. Il publie des articles qui sont reconnus pour la formation continue et informe sur l’actualité en médecine dentaire et dans le domaine de la politique professionnelle de la SSO.