Rafael Zago Baltazar, Sofie Claerhout, Sara Vander Borght, Lien Spans, Raphael Sciot, Patrick Schöffski, Daphne Hompes, Friedl Sinnaeve, Hazem Wafa, Marleen Renard, Mari FCM van den Hout, Astrid Vernemmen, Louis Libbrecht, An-Katrien De Roo, Filomena Mazzeo, Cédric van Marcke, Karen Deraedt, Claire Bourgain, Isabelle Vanden Bempt
{"title":"将靶向 RNA 测序作为软组织和骨肿瘤诊断工作流程的一部分,检测复发性和新型融合。","authors":"Rafael Zago Baltazar, Sofie Claerhout, Sara Vander Borght, Lien Spans, Raphael Sciot, Patrick Schöffski, Daphne Hompes, Friedl Sinnaeve, Hazem Wafa, Marleen Renard, Mari FCM van den Hout, Astrid Vernemmen, Louis Libbrecht, An-Katrien De Roo, Filomena Mazzeo, Cédric van Marcke, Karen Deraedt, Claire Bourgain, Isabelle Vanden Bempt","doi":"10.1002/2056-4538.12376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The identification of gene fusions has become an integral part of soft tissue and bone tumour diagnosis. We investigated the added value of targeted RNA-based sequencing (targeted RNA-seq, Archer FusionPlex) to our current molecular diagnostic workflow of these tumours, which is based on fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridisation (FISH) for the detection of gene fusions using 25 probes. In a series of 131 diagnostic samples targeted RNA-seq identified a gene fusion, <i>BCOR</i> internal tandem duplication or <i>ALK</i> deletion in 47 cases (35.9%). For 74 cases, encompassing 137 FISH analyses, concordance between FISH and targeted RNA-seq was evaluated. A positive or negative FISH result was confirmed by targeted RNA-seq in 27 out of 49 (55.1%) and 81 out of 88 (92.0%) analyses, respectively. While negative concordance was high, targeted RNA-seq identified a canonical gene fusion in seven cases despite a negative FISH result. The 22 discordant FISH-positive analyses showed a lower percentage of rearrangement-positive nuclei (range 15–41%) compared to the concordant FISH-positive analyses (>41% of nuclei in 88.9% of cases). Six FISH analyses (in four cases) were finally considered false positive based on histological and targeted RNA-seq findings. For the <i>EWSR1</i> FISH probe, we observed a gene-dependent disparity (<i>p</i> = 0.0020), with 8 out of 35 cases showing a discordance between FISH and targeted RNA-seq (22.9%). This study demonstrates an added value of targeted RNA-seq to our current diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours in 19 out of 131 cases (14.5%), which we categorised as altered diagnosis (3 cases), added precision (6 cases), or augmented spectrum (10 cases). In the latter subgroup, four novel fusion transcripts were found for which the clinical relevance remains unclear: <i>NAB2::NCOA2</i>, <i>YAP1::NUTM2B</i>, <i>HSPA8::BRAF</i>, and <i>PDE2A::PLAG1</i>. Overall, targeted RNA-seq has proven extremely valuable in the diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2056-4538.12376","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrent and novel fusions detected by targeted RNA sequencing as part of the diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Zago Baltazar, Sofie Claerhout, Sara Vander Borght, Lien Spans, Raphael Sciot, Patrick Schöffski, Daphne Hompes, Friedl Sinnaeve, Hazem Wafa, Marleen Renard, Mari FCM van den Hout, Astrid Vernemmen, Louis Libbrecht, An-Katrien De Roo, Filomena Mazzeo, Cédric van Marcke, Karen Deraedt, Claire Bourgain, Isabelle Vanden Bempt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/2056-4538.12376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The identification of gene fusions has become an integral part of soft tissue and bone tumour diagnosis. We investigated the added value of targeted RNA-based sequencing (targeted RNA-seq, Archer FusionPlex) to our current molecular diagnostic workflow of these tumours, which is based on fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridisation (FISH) for the detection of gene fusions using 25 probes. In a series of 131 diagnostic samples targeted RNA-seq identified a gene fusion, <i>BCOR</i> internal tandem duplication or <i>ALK</i> deletion in 47 cases (35.9%). For 74 cases, encompassing 137 FISH analyses, concordance between FISH and targeted RNA-seq was evaluated. A positive or negative FISH result was confirmed by targeted RNA-seq in 27 out of 49 (55.1%) and 81 out of 88 (92.0%) analyses, respectively. While negative concordance was high, targeted RNA-seq identified a canonical gene fusion in seven cases despite a negative FISH result. The 22 discordant FISH-positive analyses showed a lower percentage of rearrangement-positive nuclei (range 15–41%) compared to the concordant FISH-positive analyses (>41% of nuclei in 88.9% of cases). Six FISH analyses (in four cases) were finally considered false positive based on histological and targeted RNA-seq findings. For the <i>EWSR1</i> FISH probe, we observed a gene-dependent disparity (<i>p</i> = 0.0020), with 8 out of 35 cases showing a discordance between FISH and targeted RNA-seq (22.9%). This study demonstrates an added value of targeted RNA-seq to our current diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours in 19 out of 131 cases (14.5%), which we categorised as altered diagnosis (3 cases), added precision (6 cases), or augmented spectrum (10 cases). In the latter subgroup, four novel fusion transcripts were found for which the clinical relevance remains unclear: <i>NAB2::NCOA2</i>, <i>YAP1::NUTM2B</i>, <i>HSPA8::BRAF</i>, and <i>PDE2A::PLAG1</i>. Overall, targeted RNA-seq has proven extremely valuable in the diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2056-4538.12376\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.12376\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.12376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
基因融合的鉴定已成为软组织和骨肿瘤诊断不可或缺的一部分。我们研究了基于 RNA 的靶向测序(靶向 RNA-seq,Archer FusionPlex)对目前这些肿瘤分子诊断工作流程的附加价值,该流程基于荧光原位杂交(FISH),使用 25 个探针检测基因融合。在一系列 131 个诊断样本中,有 47 个病例(35.9%)的靶向 RNA-seq 发现了基因融合、BCOR 内部串联重复或 ALK 缺失。在 74 个病例(包括 137 项 FISH 分析)中,对 FISH 和靶向 RNA-seq 的一致性进行了评估。在 49 次分析中有 27 次(55.1%)和 88 次分析中有 81 次(92.0%)的 FISH 阳性或阴性结果分别得到了靶向 RNA-seq 的证实。虽然阴性结果的一致性很高,但在 7 个病例中,尽管 FISH 结果为阴性,但靶向 RNA-seq 还是发现了典型基因融合。与一致的 FISH 阳性分析(在 88.9% 的病例中,>41% 的核仁)相比,22 例不一致的 FISH 阳性分析中重排阳性核仁的比例较低(范围为 15-41%)。根据组织学和靶向 RNA-seq 研究结果,有 6 项 FISH 分析(4 例)最终被认为是假阳性。对于 EWSR1 FISH 探针,我们观察到了基因依赖性差异(p = 0.0020),35 个病例中有 8 个病例的 FISH 和靶向 RNA-seq 结果不一致(22.9%)。这项研究表明,在 131 个病例中,有 19 个病例(14.5%)的靶向 RNA-seq 为我们目前的软组织和骨肿瘤诊断工作流程带来了附加值,我们将其归类为改变诊断(3 个病例)、提高精确度(6 个病例)或增强谱系(10 个病例)。在后一亚组中,我们发现了四个新的融合转录本,其临床意义尚不清楚:NAB2::NCOA2、YAP1::NUTM2B、HSPA8::BRAF 和 PDE2A::PLAG1。总之,靶向 RNA-seq 已被证明在软组织和骨肿瘤的诊断流程中极具价值。
Recurrent and novel fusions detected by targeted RNA sequencing as part of the diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours
The identification of gene fusions has become an integral part of soft tissue and bone tumour diagnosis. We investigated the added value of targeted RNA-based sequencing (targeted RNA-seq, Archer FusionPlex) to our current molecular diagnostic workflow of these tumours, which is based on fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) for the detection of gene fusions using 25 probes. In a series of 131 diagnostic samples targeted RNA-seq identified a gene fusion, BCOR internal tandem duplication or ALK deletion in 47 cases (35.9%). For 74 cases, encompassing 137 FISH analyses, concordance between FISH and targeted RNA-seq was evaluated. A positive or negative FISH result was confirmed by targeted RNA-seq in 27 out of 49 (55.1%) and 81 out of 88 (92.0%) analyses, respectively. While negative concordance was high, targeted RNA-seq identified a canonical gene fusion in seven cases despite a negative FISH result. The 22 discordant FISH-positive analyses showed a lower percentage of rearrangement-positive nuclei (range 15–41%) compared to the concordant FISH-positive analyses (>41% of nuclei in 88.9% of cases). Six FISH analyses (in four cases) were finally considered false positive based on histological and targeted RNA-seq findings. For the EWSR1 FISH probe, we observed a gene-dependent disparity (p = 0.0020), with 8 out of 35 cases showing a discordance between FISH and targeted RNA-seq (22.9%). This study demonstrates an added value of targeted RNA-seq to our current diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours in 19 out of 131 cases (14.5%), which we categorised as altered diagnosis (3 cases), added precision (6 cases), or augmented spectrum (10 cases). In the latter subgroup, four novel fusion transcripts were found for which the clinical relevance remains unclear: NAB2::NCOA2, YAP1::NUTM2B, HSPA8::BRAF, and PDE2A::PLAG1. Overall, targeted RNA-seq has proven extremely valuable in the diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies.
The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.