黑果酸换肤与 25% 三氯醋酸换肤对轻中度寻常型痤疮疗效和安全性的比较评估:分脸研究。

Q3 Medicine
Neerja Puri, Sumir Kumar, Sameer Kaur, B K Brar
{"title":"黑果酸换肤与 25% 三氯醋酸换肤对轻中度寻常型痤疮疗效和安全性的比较评估:分脸研究。","authors":"Neerja Puri, Sumir Kumar, Sameer Kaur, B K Brar","doi":"10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_69_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peeling has withstood the test of time as a simple, minimally invasive method to renew the skin, despite the introduction of more advanced procedures like lasers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty patients (or 60 sites) with age ranging from 15 to 45 years with mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris were included in the study. Assessment at baseline was done by the global acne grading system score for including mild and moderate acne patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On grading the improvement according to the 5-point Global Assessment Scale (GAS), it was found that in area A (black peel), 6.7% of patients showed excellent improvement, 86.7% of patients showed good improvement, and 6.7% of patients showed fair improvement. In area B (25%TCA peel), 6.7% of patients showed excellent improvement, 80% of patients showed good improvement, and 13.3% of patients showed fair improvement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>None of the patients showed poor or worse outcomes in any of the areas. The difference between the groups was not significant (<i>P =</i> 0.688).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a paucity of data in the literature regarding the comparison of black peel with other conventional peels in the treatment of acne vulgaris. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing black peel with TCA peel in the treatment of acne vulgaris.</p>","PeriodicalId":15415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11086936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of therapeutic efficacy and safety of black peel versus 25% trichloroacetic acid peel in mild to moderate acne vulgaris: a split face study.\",\"authors\":\"Neerja Puri, Sumir Kumar, Sameer Kaur, B K Brar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_69_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peeling has withstood the test of time as a simple, minimally invasive method to renew the skin, despite the introduction of more advanced procedures like lasers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty patients (or 60 sites) with age ranging from 15 to 45 years with mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris were included in the study. Assessment at baseline was done by the global acne grading system score for including mild and moderate acne patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On grading the improvement according to the 5-point Global Assessment Scale (GAS), it was found that in area A (black peel), 6.7% of patients showed excellent improvement, 86.7% of patients showed good improvement, and 6.7% of patients showed fair improvement. In area B (25%TCA peel), 6.7% of patients showed excellent improvement, 80% of patients showed good improvement, and 13.3% of patients showed fair improvement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>None of the patients showed poor or worse outcomes in any of the areas. The difference between the groups was not significant (<i>P =</i> 0.688).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a paucity of data in the literature regarding the comparison of black peel with other conventional peels in the treatment of acne vulgaris. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing black peel with TCA peel in the treatment of acne vulgaris.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"11-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11086936/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_69_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_69_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:作为一种简单、微创的皮肤更新方法,去皮术经受住了时间的考验,尽管激光等更先进的治疗方法已经问世:研究对象包括 30 名年龄在 15 至 45 岁之间、患有轻度至中度寻常型痤疮的患者(或 60 个部位)。对轻度和中度痤疮患者的基线评估采用全球痤疮分级系统评分法:根据 5 分全球评估量表(GAS)对改善情况进行评分,发现在 A 区(黑色脱皮),6.7% 的患者改善情况极佳,86.7% 的患者改善情况良好,6.7% 的患者改善情况一般。在 B 区(25%TCA 去皮),6.7% 的患者有极好的改善,80% 的患者有良好的改善,13.3% 的患者有一般的改善:讨论:没有患者在任何一个部位的治疗效果不佳或较差。讨论:没有一名患者在任何方面的疗效不佳或较差,组间差异不显著(P = 0.688):关于黑果皮与其他传统换肤疗法在治疗寻常型痤疮方面的比较,文献中的数据很少。据我们所知,这是第一项在治疗寻常型痤疮时比较黑果皮与 TCA 果皮的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of therapeutic efficacy and safety of black peel versus 25% trichloroacetic acid peel in mild to moderate acne vulgaris: a split face study.

Introduction: Peeling has withstood the test of time as a simple, minimally invasive method to renew the skin, despite the introduction of more advanced procedures like lasers.

Materials and methods: Thirty patients (or 60 sites) with age ranging from 15 to 45 years with mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris were included in the study. Assessment at baseline was done by the global acne grading system score for including mild and moderate acne patients.

Results: On grading the improvement according to the 5-point Global Assessment Scale (GAS), it was found that in area A (black peel), 6.7% of patients showed excellent improvement, 86.7% of patients showed good improvement, and 6.7% of patients showed fair improvement. In area B (25%TCA peel), 6.7% of patients showed excellent improvement, 80% of patients showed good improvement, and 13.3% of patients showed fair improvement.

Discussion: None of the patients showed poor or worse outcomes in any of the areas. The difference between the groups was not significant (P = 0.688).

Conclusion: There is a paucity of data in the literature regarding the comparison of black peel with other conventional peels in the treatment of acne vulgaris. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing black peel with TCA peel in the treatment of acne vulgaris.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover aspects of Dermatosurgery and Aesthetic surgery, including cutaneous surgical procedures, lasers, light based treatments and aesthetic treatments. Authors of articles addressing topics such as skin tumours, pigmentary disorders, histopathology, diagnostic techniques, drugs, applications of cosmeceuticals surgical aspects, including pre and post procedural care are highly encouraged to submit with us. The journal also publishes articles on topics in allied specialities suh as plastic surgery, maxillofacial surgery vascular surgery, oculoplastic surgery etc. that are relevant to Dermatosurgery. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed Original Research Articles, Systematic reviews, Narrative Reviews, Case reports, Innovations and Debates. Letters to the editor, practice points, pearls in cutaneous and aesthetic surgery, quiz page, images, novel techniques, newer uses of instruments and video presentations and ethical aspects of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery are also invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信