{"title":"那曲-西藏高原高寒生态系统高空间分辨率土壤水分检索:半经验方法与机器学习方法的比较研究","authors":"Aida Taghavi-Bayat, Markus Gerke, Björn Riedel","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2024.100135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil moisture (SM) is an essential climate variable that directly and indirectly affects vegetation growth and survival through land‒atmosphere interactions. Alpine vegetation on the Tibetan Plateau is part of a unique ecosystem that is vulnerable to changes in environmental factors such as SM; consequently, this makes this ecosystem extremely sensitive to climate change. This study investigated the potential of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) vegetation indices based on Sentinel-1 data for retrieving SM at high spatial resolution (10 m) over an alpine grassland ecosystem in the Nagqu region. Several SAR vegetation indices, including the dual polarization SAR vegetation index (DPSVI), modified dual polarization SAR vegetation index (mDPSVI), dual polarimetric radar vegetation index (DpRVI), polarimetric radar vegetation index (PRVI), and radar vegetation index (RVI), were used in the semiempirical water cloud model (WCM) to determine which indices provide better SM retrievals in this alpine ecosystem. In addition, the potential of the distributed random forest (DRF) machine learning algorithm was explored using the same variables as the WCM together with several ecohydrological parameters from different data sources. The recursive feature elimination algorithm was used to establish the optimized DRF model. Among the vegetation indices based on SAR data, DPSVI, DpRVI, and PRVI showed similar results, with DPSVI performing slightly better than the other SAR indices, with a correlation coefficient (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.70 and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.04 m<sup>3</sup>m<sup>-3</sup>. A comparison of the optimized DRF with the best fitted WCM reveals that the DRF algorithm outperformed the WCM, including having more predictors (10 variables) in the model. The results show that the overall accuracies in terms of the R<sup>2</sup> values and the RMSEs of both the WCMs and the DRF models were 0.52–0.75 and 0.08 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup> to 0.04 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively, which was validated over in situ SM measurements in the Nagqu region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100135"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000191/pdfft?md5=a3eb8ed102cfbbc155d527d31b025987&pid=1-s2.0-S2666017224000191-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil moisture retrieval at high spatial resolution over alpine ecosystems on Nagqu-Tibetan plateau: A comparative study on semiempirical and machine learning approaches\",\"authors\":\"Aida Taghavi-Bayat, Markus Gerke, Björn Riedel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.srs.2024.100135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soil moisture (SM) is an essential climate variable that directly and indirectly affects vegetation growth and survival through land‒atmosphere interactions. Alpine vegetation on the Tibetan Plateau is part of a unique ecosystem that is vulnerable to changes in environmental factors such as SM; consequently, this makes this ecosystem extremely sensitive to climate change. This study investigated the potential of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) vegetation indices based on Sentinel-1 data for retrieving SM at high spatial resolution (10 m) over an alpine grassland ecosystem in the Nagqu region. Several SAR vegetation indices, including the dual polarization SAR vegetation index (DPSVI), modified dual polarization SAR vegetation index (mDPSVI), dual polarimetric radar vegetation index (DpRVI), polarimetric radar vegetation index (PRVI), and radar vegetation index (RVI), were used in the semiempirical water cloud model (WCM) to determine which indices provide better SM retrievals in this alpine ecosystem. In addition, the potential of the distributed random forest (DRF) machine learning algorithm was explored using the same variables as the WCM together with several ecohydrological parameters from different data sources. The recursive feature elimination algorithm was used to establish the optimized DRF model. Among the vegetation indices based on SAR data, DPSVI, DpRVI, and PRVI showed similar results, with DPSVI performing slightly better than the other SAR indices, with a correlation coefficient (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.70 and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.04 m<sup>3</sup>m<sup>-3</sup>. A comparison of the optimized DRF with the best fitted WCM reveals that the DRF algorithm outperformed the WCM, including having more predictors (10 variables) in the model. The results show that the overall accuracies in terms of the R<sup>2</sup> values and the RMSEs of both the WCMs and the DRF models were 0.52–0.75 and 0.08 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup> to 0.04 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively, which was validated over in situ SM measurements in the Nagqu region.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000191/pdfft?md5=a3eb8ed102cfbbc155d527d31b025987&pid=1-s2.0-S2666017224000191-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Soil moisture retrieval at high spatial resolution over alpine ecosystems on Nagqu-Tibetan plateau: A comparative study on semiempirical and machine learning approaches
Soil moisture (SM) is an essential climate variable that directly and indirectly affects vegetation growth and survival through land‒atmosphere interactions. Alpine vegetation on the Tibetan Plateau is part of a unique ecosystem that is vulnerable to changes in environmental factors such as SM; consequently, this makes this ecosystem extremely sensitive to climate change. This study investigated the potential of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) vegetation indices based on Sentinel-1 data for retrieving SM at high spatial resolution (10 m) over an alpine grassland ecosystem in the Nagqu region. Several SAR vegetation indices, including the dual polarization SAR vegetation index (DPSVI), modified dual polarization SAR vegetation index (mDPSVI), dual polarimetric radar vegetation index (DpRVI), polarimetric radar vegetation index (PRVI), and radar vegetation index (RVI), were used in the semiempirical water cloud model (WCM) to determine which indices provide better SM retrievals in this alpine ecosystem. In addition, the potential of the distributed random forest (DRF) machine learning algorithm was explored using the same variables as the WCM together with several ecohydrological parameters from different data sources. The recursive feature elimination algorithm was used to establish the optimized DRF model. Among the vegetation indices based on SAR data, DPSVI, DpRVI, and PRVI showed similar results, with DPSVI performing slightly better than the other SAR indices, with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.70 and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.04 m3m-3. A comparison of the optimized DRF with the best fitted WCM reveals that the DRF algorithm outperformed the WCM, including having more predictors (10 variables) in the model. The results show that the overall accuracies in terms of the R2 values and the RMSEs of both the WCMs and the DRF models were 0.52–0.75 and 0.08 m3 m−3 to 0.04 m3 m−3, respectively, which was validated over in situ SM measurements in the Nagqu region.