评估 HER2 阳性早期乳腺癌患者皮下注射曲妥珠单抗的安全性和耐受性:开放标签、随机、多中心、IIIB ESCAPE 试验结果

Q3 Medicine
Dilyara Kaidarova , Edvard Zhavrid , Oxana Shatkovskaya , Aliaksandr Prokharau , Nina Akhmed , Dauren Sembayev , Zhanna Rutzhanova , Alexandr Ivankov
{"title":"评估 HER2 阳性早期乳腺癌患者皮下注射曲妥珠单抗的安全性和耐受性:开放标签、随机、多中心、IIIB ESCAPE 试验结果","authors":"Dilyara Kaidarova ,&nbsp;Edvard Zhavrid ,&nbsp;Oxana Shatkovskaya ,&nbsp;Aliaksandr Prokharau ,&nbsp;Nina Akhmed ,&nbsp;Dauren Sembayev ,&nbsp;Zhanna Rutzhanova ,&nbsp;Alexandr Ivankov","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous (SC) trastuzumab (Herceptin) administered either with a single-use injection device (SID) or manually from a vial using a hand-held syringe.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The ESCAPE trial (NCT02194166) included 90 women aged 18 years or older with HER2-positive early breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment and completed (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (if indicated). Patients enrolled in the study were first subjected to 4 cycles of trastuzumab IV (8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg maintenance dose, q3w) prior to being randomized into groups: [A] SC trastuzumab (fixed dose 600 mg, q3w) administered through a hand-held syringe followed by 7 cycles of SC trastuzumab administered with an SID or [B] the reverse sequence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patient-reported outcomes revealed that 78 (94.0 % [95 % CI: 90.4–99.0]) out of 83 patients preferred SC trastuzumab over IV trastuzumab, among whom 28 patients indicated a strong preference. Sixteen out of 17 HCPs (94.1 %) were very satisfied with the use of SC trastuzumab, while 1/17 (5.9 %) remained uncertain. The mean time spent for IV vs. SC trastuzumab administration, including pre- and postinjection procedures, was 93.8 and 22 min, respectively. A total of 49 (54.4 %) patients reported 164 AEs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this trial, SC trastuzumab was preferred over IV trastuzumab. The duration of SC trastuzumab administration was significantly shorter than that of IV trastuzumab, saving patients and HCPs time. Safety and efficacy results were consistent with other published trials and were not associated with any new safety signal.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000297/pdfft?md5=082e01b0512576154bebb1218d234e96&pid=1-s2.0-S2468294224000297-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of safety and tolerability of subcutaneous trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: Results of an open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase IIIB ESCAPE trial\",\"authors\":\"Dilyara Kaidarova ,&nbsp;Edvard Zhavrid ,&nbsp;Oxana Shatkovskaya ,&nbsp;Aliaksandr Prokharau ,&nbsp;Nina Akhmed ,&nbsp;Dauren Sembayev ,&nbsp;Zhanna Rutzhanova ,&nbsp;Alexandr Ivankov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous (SC) trastuzumab (Herceptin) administered either with a single-use injection device (SID) or manually from a vial using a hand-held syringe.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The ESCAPE trial (NCT02194166) included 90 women aged 18 years or older with HER2-positive early breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment and completed (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (if indicated). Patients enrolled in the study were first subjected to 4 cycles of trastuzumab IV (8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg maintenance dose, q3w) prior to being randomized into groups: [A] SC trastuzumab (fixed dose 600 mg, q3w) administered through a hand-held syringe followed by 7 cycles of SC trastuzumab administered with an SID or [B] the reverse sequence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patient-reported outcomes revealed that 78 (94.0 % [95 % CI: 90.4–99.0]) out of 83 patients preferred SC trastuzumab over IV trastuzumab, among whom 28 patients indicated a strong preference. Sixteen out of 17 HCPs (94.1 %) were very satisfied with the use of SC trastuzumab, while 1/17 (5.9 %) remained uncertain. The mean time spent for IV vs. SC trastuzumab administration, including pre- and postinjection procedures, was 93.8 and 22 min, respectively. A total of 49 (54.4 %) patients reported 164 AEs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this trial, SC trastuzumab was preferred over IV trastuzumab. The duration of SC trastuzumab administration was significantly shorter than that of IV trastuzumab, saving patients and HCPs time. Safety and efficacy results were consistent with other published trials and were not associated with any new safety signal.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment and research communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000297/pdfft?md5=082e01b0512576154bebb1218d234e96&pid=1-s2.0-S2468294224000297-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment and research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468294224000297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法ESCAPE试验(NCT02194166)纳入了90名年龄在18岁或18岁以上、患有HER2阳性早期乳腺癌、接受过手术治疗并完成(新)辅助化疗和放疗(如有指征)的女性患者。参加研究的患者首先接受4个周期的曲妥珠单抗静脉注射(8毫克/千克负荷剂量,然后是6毫克/千克维持剂量,q3w),然后被随机分为以下两组:[A] 用手持注射器注射固定剂量600毫克的SC曲妥珠单抗,然后用SID注射7个周期的SC曲妥珠单抗;或[B] 相反顺序。结果患者报告结果显示,与静脉注射曲妥珠单抗相比,83 名患者中有 78 人(94.0% [95 % CI:90.4-99.0])更倾向于使用皮下注射曲妥珠单抗,其中 28 名患者表示强烈倾向于皮下注射曲妥珠单抗。17名高级保健人员中有16名(94.1%)对使用皮下注射曲妥珠单抗非常满意,1/17(5.9%)仍不确定。静脉注射曲妥珠单抗与皮下注射曲妥珠单抗所花费的平均时间(包括注射前和注射后的程序)分别为 93.8 分钟和 22 分钟。共有 49 名(54.4%)患者报告了 164 例 AE。与静脉注射曲妥珠单抗相比,静注曲妥珠单抗的用药时间明显缩短,为患者和医护人员节省了时间。安全性和疗效结果与其他已发表的试验结果一致,没有出现任何新的安全信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of safety and tolerability of subcutaneous trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: Results of an open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase IIIB ESCAPE trial

Aim

To assess the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous (SC) trastuzumab (Herceptin) administered either with a single-use injection device (SID) or manually from a vial using a hand-held syringe.

Methods

The ESCAPE trial (NCT02194166) included 90 women aged 18 years or older with HER2-positive early breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment and completed (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (if indicated). Patients enrolled in the study were first subjected to 4 cycles of trastuzumab IV (8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg maintenance dose, q3w) prior to being randomized into groups: [A] SC trastuzumab (fixed dose 600 mg, q3w) administered through a hand-held syringe followed by 7 cycles of SC trastuzumab administered with an SID or [B] the reverse sequence.

Results

Patient-reported outcomes revealed that 78 (94.0 % [95 % CI: 90.4–99.0]) out of 83 patients preferred SC trastuzumab over IV trastuzumab, among whom 28 patients indicated a strong preference. Sixteen out of 17 HCPs (94.1 %) were very satisfied with the use of SC trastuzumab, while 1/17 (5.9 %) remained uncertain. The mean time spent for IV vs. SC trastuzumab administration, including pre- and postinjection procedures, was 93.8 and 22 min, respectively. A total of 49 (54.4 %) patients reported 164 AEs.

Conclusions

In this trial, SC trastuzumab was preferred over IV trastuzumab. The duration of SC trastuzumab administration was significantly shorter than that of IV trastuzumab, saving patients and HCPs time. Safety and efficacy results were consistent with other published trials and were not associated with any new safety signal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信