整合初级医疗和姑息关怀服务,改善生命末期的平等与公平:现实主义利益相关者研讨会的成果。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1177/02692163241248962
Sarah Mitchell, Nicola Turner, Kate Fryer, Justin Aunger, Jude Beng, Emilie Couchman, Isabel Leach, Joanne Bayly, Clare Gardiner, Katherine E Sleeman, Catherine J Evans
{"title":"整合初级医疗和姑息关怀服务,改善生命末期的平等与公平:现实主义利益相关者研讨会的成果。","authors":"Sarah Mitchell, Nicola Turner, Kate Fryer, Justin Aunger, Jude Beng, Emilie Couchman, Isabel Leach, Joanne Bayly, Clare Gardiner, Katherine E Sleeman, Catherine J Evans","doi":"10.1177/02692163241248962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inequalities in access to palliative and end of life care are longstanding. Integration of primary and palliative care has the potential to improve equity in the community. Evidence to inform integration is scarce as research that considers integration of primary care and palliative care services is rare.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To address the questions: 'how can inequalities in access to community palliative and end of life care be improved through the integration of primary and palliative care, and what are the benefits?'</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A theory-driven realist inquiry with two stakeholder workshops to explore how, when and why inequalities can be improved through integration. Realist analysis leading to explanatory context(c)-mechanism(m)-outcome(o) configurations(c) (CMOCs).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 27 participants attended online workshops (July and September 2022): patient and public members (<i>n</i> = 6), commissioners (<i>n</i> = 2), primary care (<i>n</i> = 5) and specialist palliative care professionals (<i>n</i> = 14). Most were White British (<i>n</i> = 22), other ethnicities were Asian (<i>n</i> = 3), Black African (<i>n</i> = 1) and British mixed race (<i>n</i> = 1). Power imbalances and racism hinder people from ethnic minority backgrounds accessing current services. Shared commitment to addressing these across palliative care and primary care is required in integrated partnerships. Partnership functioning depends on trusted relationships and effective communication, enabled by co-location and record sharing. Positive patient experiences provide affirmation for the multi-disciplinary team, grow confidence and drive improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integration to address inequalities needs recognition of current barriers. Integration grounded in trust, faith and confidence can lead to a cycle of positive patient, carer and professional experience. Prioritising inequalities as whole system concern is required for future service delivery and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"830-841"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of primary care and palliative care services to improve equality and equity at the end-of-life: Findings from realist stakeholder workshops.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Mitchell, Nicola Turner, Kate Fryer, Justin Aunger, Jude Beng, Emilie Couchman, Isabel Leach, Joanne Bayly, Clare Gardiner, Katherine E Sleeman, Catherine J Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692163241248962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inequalities in access to palliative and end of life care are longstanding. Integration of primary and palliative care has the potential to improve equity in the community. Evidence to inform integration is scarce as research that considers integration of primary care and palliative care services is rare.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To address the questions: 'how can inequalities in access to community palliative and end of life care be improved through the integration of primary and palliative care, and what are the benefits?'</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A theory-driven realist inquiry with two stakeholder workshops to explore how, when and why inequalities can be improved through integration. Realist analysis leading to explanatory context(c)-mechanism(m)-outcome(o) configurations(c) (CMOCs).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 27 participants attended online workshops (July and September 2022): patient and public members (<i>n</i> = 6), commissioners (<i>n</i> = 2), primary care (<i>n</i> = 5) and specialist palliative care professionals (<i>n</i> = 14). Most were White British (<i>n</i> = 22), other ethnicities were Asian (<i>n</i> = 3), Black African (<i>n</i> = 1) and British mixed race (<i>n</i> = 1). Power imbalances and racism hinder people from ethnic minority backgrounds accessing current services. Shared commitment to addressing these across palliative care and primary care is required in integrated partnerships. Partnership functioning depends on trusted relationships and effective communication, enabled by co-location and record sharing. Positive patient experiences provide affirmation for the multi-disciplinary team, grow confidence and drive improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integration to address inequalities needs recognition of current barriers. Integration grounded in trust, faith and confidence can lead to a cycle of positive patient, carer and professional experience. Prioritising inequalities as whole system concern is required for future service delivery and research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"830-841\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448105/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241248962\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241248962","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:长期以来,在获得姑息关怀和生命末期关怀方面一直存在不平等现象。整合初级医疗和姑息关怀服务有可能提高社区的公平性。由于考虑整合初级医疗和姑息关怀服务的研究很少,因此为整合提供依据的证据很少:设计:理论驱动的现实主义探究,举办两次利益相关者研讨会,探讨如何、何时以及为何通过整合改善不平等现象。通过现实主义分析得出解释性背景(c)-机制(m)-结果(o)配置(c)(CMOCs):共有 27 人参加了在线研讨会(2022 年 7 月和 9 月):患者和公众成员(6 人)、委员(2 人)、初级医疗(5 人)和姑息关怀专家(14 人)。大多数为英国白人(22 人),其他种族包括亚裔(3 人)、非洲黑人(1 人)和英国混血儿(1 人)。权力失衡和种族主义阻碍了少数民族背景的人获得现有服务。在整合的合作关系中,需要在姑息关怀和初级医疗中共同致力于解决这些问题。合作关系的运作取决于相互信任的关系和有效的沟通,并通过合署办公和共享记录来实现。积极的患者体验为多学科团队提供了肯定,增强了信心并推动了改善:要通过整合解决不平等问题,就必须认识到当前存在的障碍。以信任、信念和信心为基础的整合可以带来患者、护理人员和专业人员的积极体验。在未来的服务提供和研究中,需要将不平等作为整个系统关注的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integration of primary care and palliative care services to improve equality and equity at the end-of-life: Findings from realist stakeholder workshops.

Background: Inequalities in access to palliative and end of life care are longstanding. Integration of primary and palliative care has the potential to improve equity in the community. Evidence to inform integration is scarce as research that considers integration of primary care and palliative care services is rare.

Aim: To address the questions: 'how can inequalities in access to community palliative and end of life care be improved through the integration of primary and palliative care, and what are the benefits?'

Design: A theory-driven realist inquiry with two stakeholder workshops to explore how, when and why inequalities can be improved through integration. Realist analysis leading to explanatory context(c)-mechanism(m)-outcome(o) configurations(c) (CMOCs).

Findings: A total of 27 participants attended online workshops (July and September 2022): patient and public members (n = 6), commissioners (n = 2), primary care (n = 5) and specialist palliative care professionals (n = 14). Most were White British (n = 22), other ethnicities were Asian (n = 3), Black African (n = 1) and British mixed race (n = 1). Power imbalances and racism hinder people from ethnic minority backgrounds accessing current services. Shared commitment to addressing these across palliative care and primary care is required in integrated partnerships. Partnership functioning depends on trusted relationships and effective communication, enabled by co-location and record sharing. Positive patient experiences provide affirmation for the multi-disciplinary team, grow confidence and drive improvements.

Conclusions: Integration to address inequalities needs recognition of current barriers. Integration grounded in trust, faith and confidence can lead to a cycle of positive patient, carer and professional experience. Prioritising inequalities as whole system concern is required for future service delivery and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信