虚拟现实训练器对急诊科住院医师掌握止血带止血技能的效果

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Vinay Saggar MD, Philip O'Donnell MD, Hillary Moss MD, Andrew Yoon MD, Carlo Lutz MD, Andrew Restivo MD, Oark Ahmed MD, Debayan Guha MD, Farrukh Jafri MD, MS-HPEd, Maninder Singh MD
{"title":"虚拟现实训练器对急诊科住院医师掌握止血带止血技能的效果","authors":"Vinay Saggar MD,&nbsp;Philip O'Donnell MD,&nbsp;Hillary Moss MD,&nbsp;Andrew Yoon MD,&nbsp;Carlo Lutz MD,&nbsp;Andrew Restivo MD,&nbsp;Oark Ahmed MD,&nbsp;Debayan Guha MD,&nbsp;Farrukh Jafri MD, MS-HPEd,&nbsp;Maninder Singh MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>With a rise in mass casualty incidents, training in hemorrhage control using tourniquets has been championed as a basic—and lifesaving—procedure for bystanders and medical professionals alike. The current standard for training is in-person (IP) courses, which can be limited based on instructor availability. Virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated the potential to improve the accuracy of certain medical tasks but has not yet been developed for hemorrhage control. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a VR hemorrhage trainer in learner retention of tourniquet application when compared to traditional IP instructor teaching among a cohort of emergency medicine residents practicing in a Level I trauma center.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a prospective, observational study of 53 emergency medicine residents at an inner-city program. Participants were randomly assigned to either the control or the VR group. On Day 0, all residents underwent a training session (IP vs. VR) for the proper, stepwise application of a tourniquet, as defined by the American College of Trauma Surgeons. Each participant was then assessed on the application of a tourniquet by a blinded instructor using the National Registry Hemorrhage Control Skills Lab rubric. After 3 months, each resident was reevaluated on the same rubric, with subsequent data analysis on successful tourniquet placement (measured as under 90 s) and time to completion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 53 participants, the IP training group had an initial pass rate of 97% (28/29) compared to 92% (22/24) in the VR group (<i>p</i> = 0.58). On retention testing, the IP training group had a pass rate of 95% (20/21) compared to 90% (18/20) in the VR group (<i>p</i> = 0.62). Stratifying the success of tourniquet placement by level of resident training did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this pilot study of emergency medicine residents, we found no significant differences in successful hemorrhage control by tourniquet placement between those trained with VR compared to a traditional IP course among emergency medicine residents. While more studies with greater power are needed, the results suggest that VR may be a useful adjunct to traditional IP medical training.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a virtual reality trainer for retention of tourniquet application skills for hemorrhage control among emergency medicine residents\",\"authors\":\"Vinay Saggar MD,&nbsp;Philip O'Donnell MD,&nbsp;Hillary Moss MD,&nbsp;Andrew Yoon MD,&nbsp;Carlo Lutz MD,&nbsp;Andrew Restivo MD,&nbsp;Oark Ahmed MD,&nbsp;Debayan Guha MD,&nbsp;Farrukh Jafri MD, MS-HPEd,&nbsp;Maninder Singh MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.10986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>With a rise in mass casualty incidents, training in hemorrhage control using tourniquets has been championed as a basic—and lifesaving—procedure for bystanders and medical professionals alike. The current standard for training is in-person (IP) courses, which can be limited based on instructor availability. Virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated the potential to improve the accuracy of certain medical tasks but has not yet been developed for hemorrhage control. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a VR hemorrhage trainer in learner retention of tourniquet application when compared to traditional IP instructor teaching among a cohort of emergency medicine residents practicing in a Level I trauma center.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a prospective, observational study of 53 emergency medicine residents at an inner-city program. Participants were randomly assigned to either the control or the VR group. On Day 0, all residents underwent a training session (IP vs. VR) for the proper, stepwise application of a tourniquet, as defined by the American College of Trauma Surgeons. Each participant was then assessed on the application of a tourniquet by a blinded instructor using the National Registry Hemorrhage Control Skills Lab rubric. After 3 months, each resident was reevaluated on the same rubric, with subsequent data analysis on successful tourniquet placement (measured as under 90 s) and time to completion.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 53 participants, the IP training group had an initial pass rate of 97% (28/29) compared to 92% (22/24) in the VR group (<i>p</i> = 0.58). On retention testing, the IP training group had a pass rate of 95% (20/21) compared to 90% (18/20) in the VR group (<i>p</i> = 0.62). Stratifying the success of tourniquet placement by level of resident training did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this pilot study of emergency medicine residents, we found no significant differences in successful hemorrhage control by tourniquet placement between those trained with VR compared to a traditional IP course among emergency medicine residents. While more studies with greater power are needed, the results suggest that VR may be a useful adjunct to traditional IP medical training.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 随着大规模伤亡事件的增加,使用止血带控制出血的培训已成为旁观者和医疗专业人员的基本救生程序。目前的培训标准是面对面(IP)课程,但这可能会受到教员可用性的限制。虚拟现实(VR)已证明有可能提高某些医疗任务的准确性,但尚未开发用于出血控制的虚拟现实技术。本研究的目的是评估 VR 大出血训练器与传统的 IP 教师教学相比,对在一级创伤中心实习的急诊医学住院医师的止血带应用的学习效果。 方法 这是一项前瞻性观察研究,对象是市内一个项目的 53 名急诊科住院医师。参与者被随机分配到对照组或 VR 组。第 0 天,所有住院医师都接受了美国创伤外科医师学会规定的止血带正确分步应用培训(IP 组与 VR 组)。然后,由盲人指导员使用国家注册出血控制技能实验室的评分标准对每位学员使用止血带的情况进行评估。3 个月后,每位住院医师根据相同的评分标准再次接受评估,并对止血带的成功放置时间(以 90 秒为标准)和完成时间进行数据分析。 结果 在 53 名参与者中,IP 培训组的初始通过率为 97%(28/29),而 VR 组为 92%(22/24)(p = 0.58)。在保留测试中,IP 培训组的通过率为 95%(20/21),而 VR 组为 90%(18/20)(p = 0.62)。根据住院医师培训水平对止血带放置的成功率进行分层,并未发现任何统计学上的显著差异。 结论 在这项针对急诊科住院医师的试点研究中,我们发现在急诊科住院医师中,接受过 VR 培训的住院医师与接受过传统 IP 课程培训的住院医师在通过止血带放置成功控制出血方面没有明显差异。虽然还需要更多更强大的研究,但研究结果表明,VR 可能是传统 IP 医学培训的有效辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of a virtual reality trainer for retention of tourniquet application skills for hemorrhage control among emergency medicine residents

Background

With a rise in mass casualty incidents, training in hemorrhage control using tourniquets has been championed as a basic—and lifesaving—procedure for bystanders and medical professionals alike. The current standard for training is in-person (IP) courses, which can be limited based on instructor availability. Virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated the potential to improve the accuracy of certain medical tasks but has not yet been developed for hemorrhage control. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a VR hemorrhage trainer in learner retention of tourniquet application when compared to traditional IP instructor teaching among a cohort of emergency medicine residents practicing in a Level I trauma center.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational study of 53 emergency medicine residents at an inner-city program. Participants were randomly assigned to either the control or the VR group. On Day 0, all residents underwent a training session (IP vs. VR) for the proper, stepwise application of a tourniquet, as defined by the American College of Trauma Surgeons. Each participant was then assessed on the application of a tourniquet by a blinded instructor using the National Registry Hemorrhage Control Skills Lab rubric. After 3 months, each resident was reevaluated on the same rubric, with subsequent data analysis on successful tourniquet placement (measured as under 90 s) and time to completion.

Results

Of the 53 participants, the IP training group had an initial pass rate of 97% (28/29) compared to 92% (22/24) in the VR group (p = 0.58). On retention testing, the IP training group had a pass rate of 95% (20/21) compared to 90% (18/20) in the VR group (p = 0.62). Stratifying the success of tourniquet placement by level of resident training did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences.

Conclusions

In this pilot study of emergency medicine residents, we found no significant differences in successful hemorrhage control by tourniquet placement between those trained with VR compared to a traditional IP course among emergency medicine residents. While more studies with greater power are needed, the results suggest that VR may be a useful adjunct to traditional IP medical training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信