多形性横纹肌肉瘤的基因组图谱显示了与胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤不同的基因组特征

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Carla Saoud, Josephine K. Dermawan, Aarti E. Sharma, William Tap, Leonard H. Wexler, Cristina R. Antonescu
{"title":"多形性横纹肌肉瘤的基因组图谱显示了与胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤不同的基因组特征","authors":"Carla Saoud,&nbsp;Josephine K. Dermawan,&nbsp;Aarti E. Sharma,&nbsp;William Tap,&nbsp;Leonard H. Wexler,&nbsp;Cristina R. Antonescu","doi":"10.1002/gcc.23238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (PRMS) is a rare and highly aggressive sarcoma, occurring mostly in the deep soft tissues of middle-aged adults and showing a variable degree of skeletal muscle differentiation. The diagnosis is challenging as pathologic features overlap with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS), malignant Triton tumor, and other pleomorphic sarcomas. As recurrent genetic alterations underlying PRMS have not been described to date, ancillary molecular diagnostic testing is not useful in subclassification. Herein, we perform genomic profiling of a well-characterized cohort of 14 PRMS, compared to a control group of 23 ERMS and other pleomorphic sarcomas (undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and pleomorphic liposarcoma) using clinically validated DNA-targeted Next generation sequencing (NGS) panels (MSK-IMPACT). The PRMS cohort included eight males and six females, with a median age of 53 years (range 31–76 years). Despite similar tumor mutation burdens, the genomic landscape of PRMS, with a high frequency of <i>TP53</i> (79%) and <i>RB1</i> (43%) alterations, stood in stark contrast to ERMS, with 4% and 0%, respectively. <i>CDKN2A</i> deletions were more common in PRMS (43%), compared to ERMS (13%). In contrast, ERMS harbored somatic driver mutations in the RAS pathway and loss of function mutations in <i>BCOR</i>, which were absent in PRMS. Copy number variations in PRMS showed multiple chromosomal arm-level changes, most commonly gains of chr17p and chr22q and loss of chr6q. Notably, gain of chr8, commonly seen in ERMS (61%) was conspicuously absent in PRMS. The genomic profiles of other pleomorphic sarcomas were overall analogous to PRMS, showing shared alterations in <i>TP53</i>, <i>RB1</i>, and <i>CDKN2A</i>. Overall survival and progression-free survival of PRMS were significantly worse (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0005) than that of ERMS. Our findings revealed that the molecular landscape of PRMS aligns with other adult pleomorphic sarcomas and is distinct from that of ERMS. Thus, NGS assays may be applied in select challenging cases toward a refined classification. Finally, our data corroborate the inclusion of PRMS in the therapeutic bracket of pleomorphic sarcomas, given that their clinical outcomes are comparable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12700,"journal":{"name":"Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic profiling of pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma reveals a genomic signature distinct from that of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma\",\"authors\":\"Carla Saoud,&nbsp;Josephine K. Dermawan,&nbsp;Aarti E. Sharma,&nbsp;William Tap,&nbsp;Leonard H. Wexler,&nbsp;Cristina R. Antonescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gcc.23238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (PRMS) is a rare and highly aggressive sarcoma, occurring mostly in the deep soft tissues of middle-aged adults and showing a variable degree of skeletal muscle differentiation. The diagnosis is challenging as pathologic features overlap with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS), malignant Triton tumor, and other pleomorphic sarcomas. As recurrent genetic alterations underlying PRMS have not been described to date, ancillary molecular diagnostic testing is not useful in subclassification. Herein, we perform genomic profiling of a well-characterized cohort of 14 PRMS, compared to a control group of 23 ERMS and other pleomorphic sarcomas (undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and pleomorphic liposarcoma) using clinically validated DNA-targeted Next generation sequencing (NGS) panels (MSK-IMPACT). The PRMS cohort included eight males and six females, with a median age of 53 years (range 31–76 years). Despite similar tumor mutation burdens, the genomic landscape of PRMS, with a high frequency of <i>TP53</i> (79%) and <i>RB1</i> (43%) alterations, stood in stark contrast to ERMS, with 4% and 0%, respectively. <i>CDKN2A</i> deletions were more common in PRMS (43%), compared to ERMS (13%). In contrast, ERMS harbored somatic driver mutations in the RAS pathway and loss of function mutations in <i>BCOR</i>, which were absent in PRMS. Copy number variations in PRMS showed multiple chromosomal arm-level changes, most commonly gains of chr17p and chr22q and loss of chr6q. Notably, gain of chr8, commonly seen in ERMS (61%) was conspicuously absent in PRMS. The genomic profiles of other pleomorphic sarcomas were overall analogous to PRMS, showing shared alterations in <i>TP53</i>, <i>RB1</i>, and <i>CDKN2A</i>. Overall survival and progression-free survival of PRMS were significantly worse (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0005) than that of ERMS. Our findings revealed that the molecular landscape of PRMS aligns with other adult pleomorphic sarcomas and is distinct from that of ERMS. Thus, NGS assays may be applied in select challenging cases toward a refined classification. Finally, our data corroborate the inclusion of PRMS in the therapeutic bracket of pleomorphic sarcomas, given that their clinical outcomes are comparable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer\",\"volume\":\"63 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gcc.23238\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gcc.23238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多形性横纹肌肉瘤(PRMS)是一种罕见的侵袭性极强的肉瘤,主要发生在中年人的深部软组织中,表现出不同程度的骨骼肌分化。由于其病理特征与胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤(ERMS)、恶性Triton瘤和其他多形性肉瘤重叠,因此诊断极具挑战性。由于迄今为止尚未发现 PRMS 潜在的复发性基因改变,因此辅助分子诊断测试在亚分类中并不实用。在此,我们使用经临床验证的 DNA 靶向新一代测序(NGS)面板(MSK-IMPACT),对 14 例 PRMS 进行了基因组图谱分析,并与 23 例 ERMS 和其他多形性肉瘤(未分化多形性肉瘤和多形性脂肪肉瘤)对照组进行了比较。PRMS队列包括8名男性和6名女性,中位年龄为53岁(31-76岁)。尽管肿瘤突变负担相似,但PRMS的基因组状况与ERMS形成鲜明对比,前者的TP53(79%)和RB1(43%)改变频率较高,后者分别为4%和0%。与ERMS(13%)相比,CDKN2A缺失在PRMS(43%)中更为常见。相比之下,ERMS中存在RAS通路的体细胞驱动突变和BCOR的功能缺失突变,而PRMS中不存在这些突变。PRMS的拷贝数变异表现为多个染色体臂水平的变化,最常见的是chr17p和chr22q的增益以及chr6q的缺失。值得注意的是,ERMS(61%)中常见的chr8增益在PRMS中明显缺乏。其他多形性肉瘤的基因组图谱总体上与PRMS类似,显示出TP53、RB1和CDKN2A的共同改变。PRMS的总生存期和无进展生存期(p < 0.0005)明显低于ERMS。我们的研究结果表明,PRMS 的分子图谱与其他成人多形性肉瘤一致,与 ERMS 不同。因此,NGS 检测可用于选择具有挑战性的病例,以进行精细分类。最后,我们的数据证实了将 PRMS 纳入多形性肉瘤的治疗范围,因为它们的临床结果具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genomic profiling of pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma reveals a genomic signature distinct from that of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma

Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (PRMS) is a rare and highly aggressive sarcoma, occurring mostly in the deep soft tissues of middle-aged adults and showing a variable degree of skeletal muscle differentiation. The diagnosis is challenging as pathologic features overlap with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS), malignant Triton tumor, and other pleomorphic sarcomas. As recurrent genetic alterations underlying PRMS have not been described to date, ancillary molecular diagnostic testing is not useful in subclassification. Herein, we perform genomic profiling of a well-characterized cohort of 14 PRMS, compared to a control group of 23 ERMS and other pleomorphic sarcomas (undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and pleomorphic liposarcoma) using clinically validated DNA-targeted Next generation sequencing (NGS) panels (MSK-IMPACT). The PRMS cohort included eight males and six females, with a median age of 53 years (range 31–76 years). Despite similar tumor mutation burdens, the genomic landscape of PRMS, with a high frequency of TP53 (79%) and RB1 (43%) alterations, stood in stark contrast to ERMS, with 4% and 0%, respectively. CDKN2A deletions were more common in PRMS (43%), compared to ERMS (13%). In contrast, ERMS harbored somatic driver mutations in the RAS pathway and loss of function mutations in BCOR, which were absent in PRMS. Copy number variations in PRMS showed multiple chromosomal arm-level changes, most commonly gains of chr17p and chr22q and loss of chr6q. Notably, gain of chr8, commonly seen in ERMS (61%) was conspicuously absent in PRMS. The genomic profiles of other pleomorphic sarcomas were overall analogous to PRMS, showing shared alterations in TP53, RB1, and CDKN2A. Overall survival and progression-free survival of PRMS were significantly worse (p < 0.0005) than that of ERMS. Our findings revealed that the molecular landscape of PRMS aligns with other adult pleomorphic sarcomas and is distinct from that of ERMS. Thus, NGS assays may be applied in select challenging cases toward a refined classification. Finally, our data corroborate the inclusion of PRMS in the therapeutic bracket of pleomorphic sarcomas, given that their clinical outcomes are comparable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer
Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
94
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer will offer rapid publication of original full-length research articles, perspectives, reviews and letters to the editors on genetic analysis as related to the study of neoplasia. The main scope of the journal is to communicate new insights into the etiology and/or pathogenesis of neoplasia, as well as molecular and cellular findings of relevance for the management of cancer patients. While preference will be given to research utilizing analytical and functional approaches, descriptive studies and case reports will also be welcomed when they offer insights regarding basic biological mechanisms or the clinical management of neoplastic disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信