探索用于准确预测卤水中甲烷水合物形成温度的机器学习技术:比较研究

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q1 Multidisciplinary
Waqas Aleem, Sheraz Ahmad, Sabih Qamar, Maham Hussain, Omer Ali, Abdul Rauf
{"title":"探索用于准确预测卤水中甲烷水合物形成温度的机器学习技术:比较研究","authors":"Waqas Aleem, Sheraz Ahmad, Sabih Qamar, Maham Hussain, Omer Ali, Abdul Rauf","doi":"10.1007/s13369-024-09030-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate estimation of formation conditions plays a pivotal role in effectively managing various processes related to hydrates, including flow assurance, deep-water drilling, and hydrate-based technology development. The formation temperature of methane hydrates in the presence of brine greatly affects the efficacy and accuracy of these processes. This work presents a comprehensive and novel comparative analysis of nine distinct machine learning models for accurate prediction of formation temperatures of methane hydrate. This study investigated the application of major machine learning (ML) algorithms including multiple linear regression (MLR), long short-term memory (LSTM), radial basis function (RBF), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), gradient boosting regression (GBR), gradient process regression (GPR), random forest (RF), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN). The model accuracy was validated against a large dataset comprising of over 1000 data points with diverse range of salt concentrations. In this regard, model accuracies were compared using several metrics including <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, ARD, and AARD. The experimental results exhibited KNN algorithm to be fast-converging, accurate, and consistent over the entire range of data points with an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> score of 0.975 and AARD of 0.385%. The results enable efficient and accurate temperature estimation with ML algorithms for multiple hydrate-related processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8109,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Machine Learning Techniques for Accurate Prediction of Methane Hydrate Formation Temperature in Brine: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Waqas Aleem, Sheraz Ahmad, Sabih Qamar, Maham Hussain, Omer Ali, Abdul Rauf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13369-024-09030-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate estimation of formation conditions plays a pivotal role in effectively managing various processes related to hydrates, including flow assurance, deep-water drilling, and hydrate-based technology development. The formation temperature of methane hydrates in the presence of brine greatly affects the efficacy and accuracy of these processes. This work presents a comprehensive and novel comparative analysis of nine distinct machine learning models for accurate prediction of formation temperatures of methane hydrate. This study investigated the application of major machine learning (ML) algorithms including multiple linear regression (MLR), long short-term memory (LSTM), radial basis function (RBF), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), gradient boosting regression (GBR), gradient process regression (GPR), random forest (RF), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN). The model accuracy was validated against a large dataset comprising of over 1000 data points with diverse range of salt concentrations. In this regard, model accuracies were compared using several metrics including <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, ARD, and AARD. The experimental results exhibited KNN algorithm to be fast-converging, accurate, and consistent over the entire range of data points with an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> score of 0.975 and AARD of 0.385%. The results enable efficient and accurate temperature estimation with ML algorithms for multiple hydrate-related processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09030-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09030-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确估算地层条件对于有效管理与水合物有关的各种流程(包括流量保证、深水钻探和基于水合物的技术开发)起着至关重要的作用。存在盐水的甲烷水合物的地层温度在很大程度上影响着这些过程的有效性和准确性。本研究对九种不同的机器学习模型进行了全面而新颖的比较分析,以准确预测甲烷水合物的形成温度。这项研究调查了主要机器学习 (ML) 算法的应用情况,包括多元线性回归 (MLR)、长短期记忆 (LSTM)、径向基函数 (RBF)、支持向量机 (SVM)、人工神经网络 (ANN)、梯度提升回归 (GBR)、梯度过程回归 (GPR)、随机森林 (RF) 和 K-nearest neighbor (KNN)。模型的准确性通过一个大型数据集进行了验证,该数据集由 1000 多个数据点组成,盐浓度范围各不相同。在这方面,使用 R2、ARD 和 AARD 等多个指标对模型准确性进行了比较。实验结果表明,KNN 算法在整个数据点范围内具有快速收敛性、准确性和一致性,R2 得分为 0.975,AARD 为 0.385%。这些结果使得使用 ML 算法对多种水合物相关过程进行高效、准确的温度估算成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring Machine Learning Techniques for Accurate Prediction of Methane Hydrate Formation Temperature in Brine: A Comparative Study

Exploring Machine Learning Techniques for Accurate Prediction of Methane Hydrate Formation Temperature in Brine: A Comparative Study

Accurate estimation of formation conditions plays a pivotal role in effectively managing various processes related to hydrates, including flow assurance, deep-water drilling, and hydrate-based technology development. The formation temperature of methane hydrates in the presence of brine greatly affects the efficacy and accuracy of these processes. This work presents a comprehensive and novel comparative analysis of nine distinct machine learning models for accurate prediction of formation temperatures of methane hydrate. This study investigated the application of major machine learning (ML) algorithms including multiple linear regression (MLR), long short-term memory (LSTM), radial basis function (RBF), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), gradient boosting regression (GBR), gradient process regression (GPR), random forest (RF), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN). The model accuracy was validated against a large dataset comprising of over 1000 data points with diverse range of salt concentrations. In this regard, model accuracies were compared using several metrics including R2, ARD, and AARD. The experimental results exhibited KNN algorithm to be fast-converging, accurate, and consistent over the entire range of data points with an R2 score of 0.975 and AARD of 0.385%. The results enable efficient and accurate temperature estimation with ML algorithms for multiple hydrate-related processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) partnered with Springer to publish the Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (AJSE). AJSE, which has been published by KFUPM since 1975, is a recognized national, regional and international journal that provides a great opportunity for the dissemination of research advances from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, MENA and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信