好的、"不好的 "和 "不漂亮的":特林吉特语否定谓词中的否定

IF 0.9 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Seth Cable
{"title":"好的、\"不好的 \"和 \"不漂亮的\":特林吉特语否定谓词中的否定","authors":"Seth Cable","doi":"10.1007/s11050-018-9147-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops and defends a semantic/syntactic analysis of a curious set of negative gradable predicates in the Tlingit language, and shows that the analysis has some important consequences concerning the range of crosslinguistic variation in degree constructions. In Tlingit, certain negative gradable predicates are formed by negating a positive root and then applying an additional morphological operation: e.g. <i>k’éi</i> ‘good’, <i>tlél ukʼé</i> ‘not good’, <i>tlél ushké</i> ‘bad’. I show that (i) the negation in forms like <i>tlél ushké</i> ‘bad’ is VP-external, clausal negation, and is not an incorporated negation like English <i>un</i>-; and (ii) the meaning of these forms is indeed that of a gradable negative predicate, rather than the propositional negation of the positive predicate (cf. tlél ukʼé ‘not good’). Under the proposed analysis, the additional morphological operation observed in these forms is the reflex of a special degree relativizer, one that must undergo movement to Spec-NegP. In addition, Tlingit differs from English and other languages in that degree operators—like <i>POS</i> and comparative operators—can be attached high in the clause, above sentential negation. In addition to capturing various facts concerning these negative predicates, the proposed analysis raises some novel puzzles concerning intervention effects in the movement of degree operators, and provides support for the view that negative predicates like <i>bad</i> are morphosyntactically derived from positive predicates like <i>good</i>.","PeriodicalId":47108,"journal":{"name":"Natural Language Semantics","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The good, the ‘not good’, and the ‘not pretty’: negation in the negative predicates of Tlingit\",\"authors\":\"Seth Cable\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11050-018-9147-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper develops and defends a semantic/syntactic analysis of a curious set of negative gradable predicates in the Tlingit language, and shows that the analysis has some important consequences concerning the range of crosslinguistic variation in degree constructions. In Tlingit, certain negative gradable predicates are formed by negating a positive root and then applying an additional morphological operation: e.g. <i>k’éi</i> ‘good’, <i>tlél ukʼé</i> ‘not good’, <i>tlél ushké</i> ‘bad’. I show that (i) the negation in forms like <i>tlél ushké</i> ‘bad’ is VP-external, clausal negation, and is not an incorporated negation like English <i>un</i>-; and (ii) the meaning of these forms is indeed that of a gradable negative predicate, rather than the propositional negation of the positive predicate (cf. tlél ukʼé ‘not good’). Under the proposed analysis, the additional morphological operation observed in these forms is the reflex of a special degree relativizer, one that must undergo movement to Spec-NegP. In addition, Tlingit differs from English and other languages in that degree operators—like <i>POS</i> and comparative operators—can be attached high in the clause, above sentential negation. In addition to capturing various facts concerning these negative predicates, the proposed analysis raises some novel puzzles concerning intervention effects in the movement of degree operators, and provides support for the view that negative predicates like <i>bad</i> are morphosyntactically derived from positive predicates like <i>good</i>.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Language Semantics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Language Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-018-9147-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Language Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-018-9147-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对特林吉特(Tlingit)语言中一组奇特的否定可分级谓词进行了语义/句法分析,并证明了这一分析对程度结构的跨语言变化范围有重要影响。在特林吉特语中,某些否定可分级谓词是通过否定一个肯定词根,然后应用附加的形态操作形成的:例如 k'éi '好'、tlél ukʼé '不好'、tlél ushké '坏'。我的研究表明:(i) tlél ushké 'bad'等形式中的否定是 VP 外部的、从句的否定,而不是像英语 un- 那样的合并否定;(ii) 这些形式的意义确实是可分级的否定谓词的意义,而不是肯定谓词的命题否定(参见 tlél ukʼé 'not good')。根据所提出的分析,在这些形式中观察到的附加形态操作是一个特殊程度关系词的反射,它必须经过向 Spec-NegP 的移动。此外,特林吉特语与英语和其他语言的不同之处在于,程度运算符--如 POS 和比较运算符--可以附加在句子的较高位置,即句子否定的上方。除了捕捉有关这些否定谓词的各种事实外,所提出的分析还提出了一些有关程度运算符移动过程中的干预效果的新问题,并为 "坏 "等否定谓词在形态句法上源自 "好 "等肯定谓词的观点提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The good, the ‘not good’, and the ‘not pretty’: negation in the negative predicates of Tlingit
This paper develops and defends a semantic/syntactic analysis of a curious set of negative gradable predicates in the Tlingit language, and shows that the analysis has some important consequences concerning the range of crosslinguistic variation in degree constructions. In Tlingit, certain negative gradable predicates are formed by negating a positive root and then applying an additional morphological operation: e.g. k’éi ‘good’, tlél ukʼé ‘not good’, tlél ushké ‘bad’. I show that (i) the negation in forms like tlél ushké ‘bad’ is VP-external, clausal negation, and is not an incorporated negation like English un-; and (ii) the meaning of these forms is indeed that of a gradable negative predicate, rather than the propositional negation of the positive predicate (cf. tlél ukʼé ‘not good’). Under the proposed analysis, the additional morphological operation observed in these forms is the reflex of a special degree relativizer, one that must undergo movement to Spec-NegP. In addition, Tlingit differs from English and other languages in that degree operators—like POS and comparative operators—can be attached high in the clause, above sentential negation. In addition to capturing various facts concerning these negative predicates, the proposed analysis raises some novel puzzles concerning intervention effects in the movement of degree operators, and provides support for the view that negative predicates like bad are morphosyntactically derived from positive predicates like good.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
27.30%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Natural Language Semantics is devoted to semantics and its interfaces in grammar, especially syntax. The journal seeks to encourage the convergence of approaches employing the concepts of logic and philosophy with perspectives of generative grammar on the relations between meaning and structure. Natural Language Semantics publishes studies focused on linguistic phenomena as opposed to those dealing primarily with the field''s methodological and formal foundations. Representative topics include, but are not limited to, quantification, negation, modality, genericity, tense, aspect, aktionsarten, focus, presuppositions, anaphora, definiteness, plurals, mass nouns, adjectives, adverbial modification, nominalization, ellipsis, and interrogatives. The journal features mainly research articles, but also short squibs as well as remarks on and replies to pertinent books and articles.The journal has an Editorial Assistant, Christine Bartels, a copy editor with a PhD in linguistics who personally shepherds accepted manuscripts through the production process.Since 2009 this journal is covered by ISI/Social Sciences Citation Index.Springer fully understands that access to your work is important to you and to the sponsors of your research. We are listed as a green publisher in the SHERPA/RoMEO database, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights. Read more about author''s rights on: http://www.springer.com/gp/open-access/authors-rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信