Jack H. Bruno, Dylan Jervis, Daniel J. Varon, Daniel J. Jacob
{"title":"U-Plume:利用卫星点源成像仪进行羽流探测和源量化的自动算法","authors":"Jack H. Bruno, Dylan Jervis, Daniel J. Varon, Daniel J. Jacob","doi":"10.5194/amt-17-2625-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Current methods for detecting atmospheric plumes and inferring point-source rates from high-resolution satellite imagery are labor-intensive and not scalable with regard to the growing satellite dataset available for methane point sources. Here, we present a two-step algorithm called U-Plume for automated detection and quantification of point sources from satellite imagery. The first step delivers plume detection and delineation (masking) with a U-Net machine learning architecture for image segmentation. The second step quantifies the point-source rate from the masked plume using wind speed information and either a convolutional neural network (CNN) or a physics-based integrated mass enhancement (IME) method. The algorithm can process 62 images (each measuring 128 pixels × 128 pixels) per second on a single 2.6 GHz Intel Core i7-9750H CPU. We train the algorithm using large-eddy simulations of methane plumes superimposed on noisy and variable methane background scenes from the GHGSat-C1 satellite instrument. We introduce the concept of point-source observability, Ops=Q/(UWΔB), as a single dimensionless number to predict plume detectability and source rate quantification error from an instrument as a function of source rate Q, wind speed U, instrument pixel size W, and instrument-dependent background noise ΔB. We show that Ops can powerfully diagnose the ability of an imaging instrument to observe point sources of a certain magnitude under given conditions. U-Plume successfully detects and masks plumes from sources as small as 100 kg h−1 in GHGSat-C1 images over surfaces with low background noise and successfully handles larger point sources over surfaces with substantial background noise. We find that the IME method for source quantification is unbiased over the full range of source rates, while the CNN method is biased towards the mean of its training range. The total error in source rate quantification is dominated by wind speed at low wind speeds and by the masking algorithm at high wind speeds. A wind speed of 2–4 m s−1 is optimal for detection and quantification of point sources from satellite data.","PeriodicalId":8619,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"U-Plume: automated algorithm for plume detection and source quantification by satellite point-source imagers\",\"authors\":\"Jack H. Bruno, Dylan Jervis, Daniel J. Varon, Daniel J. Jacob\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/amt-17-2625-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Current methods for detecting atmospheric plumes and inferring point-source rates from high-resolution satellite imagery are labor-intensive and not scalable with regard to the growing satellite dataset available for methane point sources. Here, we present a two-step algorithm called U-Plume for automated detection and quantification of point sources from satellite imagery. The first step delivers plume detection and delineation (masking) with a U-Net machine learning architecture for image segmentation. The second step quantifies the point-source rate from the masked plume using wind speed information and either a convolutional neural network (CNN) or a physics-based integrated mass enhancement (IME) method. The algorithm can process 62 images (each measuring 128 pixels × 128 pixels) per second on a single 2.6 GHz Intel Core i7-9750H CPU. We train the algorithm using large-eddy simulations of methane plumes superimposed on noisy and variable methane background scenes from the GHGSat-C1 satellite instrument. We introduce the concept of point-source observability, Ops=Q/(UWΔB), as a single dimensionless number to predict plume detectability and source rate quantification error from an instrument as a function of source rate Q, wind speed U, instrument pixel size W, and instrument-dependent background noise ΔB. We show that Ops can powerfully diagnose the ability of an imaging instrument to observe point sources of a certain magnitude under given conditions. U-Plume successfully detects and masks plumes from sources as small as 100 kg h−1 in GHGSat-C1 images over surfaces with low background noise and successfully handles larger point sources over surfaces with substantial background noise. We find that the IME method for source quantification is unbiased over the full range of source rates, while the CNN method is biased towards the mean of its training range. The total error in source rate quantification is dominated by wind speed at low wind speeds and by the masking algorithm at high wind speeds. A wind speed of 2–4 m s−1 is optimal for detection and quantification of point sources from satellite data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2625-2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2625-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要。目前从高分辨率卫星图像中探测大气羽流和推断点源速率的方法耗费大量人力物力,而且无法扩展到不断增加的甲烷点源卫星数据集。在这里,我们提出了一种名为 U-Plume 的两步算法,用于从卫星图像中自动检测和量化点源。第一步是利用 U-Net 机器学习架构进行图像分割,从而实现羽流检测和划定(屏蔽)。第二步,利用风速信息和卷积神经网络(CNN)或基于物理的综合质量增强(IME)方法,量化被遮蔽羽流的点源率。该算法在单个 2.6 GHz 英特尔酷睿 i7-9750H CPU 上每秒可处理 62 幅图像(每幅图像大小为 128 像素 × 128 像素)。我们使用叠加在来自 GHGSat-C1 卫星仪器的噪声和可变甲烷背景场景上的甲烷羽流大涡流模拟来训练该算法。我们引入了点源可观测性(Ops=Q/(UWΔB))的概念,将其作为一个单一的无量纲数字来预测羽流的可探测性和仪器的源速率量化误差,它是源速率 Q、风速 U、仪器像素尺寸 W 和仪器相关背景噪声 ΔB 的函数。我们的研究表明,在给定条件下,Ops 可以有力地诊断成像仪器观测到一定大小点源的能力。U-Plume 成功地探测并屏蔽了 GHGSat-C1 图像中小至 100 kg h-1 的源在低背景噪声表面上产生的羽流,并成功地处理了较大点源在高背景噪声表面上产生的羽流。我们发现,在整个源速率范围内,用于源量化的 IME 方法是无偏的,而 CNN 方法则偏向于其训练范围的平均值。源速率量化的总误差在低风速时受风速影响,在高风速时受掩蔽算法影响。2-4 m s-1 的风速最适合从卫星数据中检测和量化点源。
U-Plume: automated algorithm for plume detection and source quantification by satellite point-source imagers
Abstract. Current methods for detecting atmospheric plumes and inferring point-source rates from high-resolution satellite imagery are labor-intensive and not scalable with regard to the growing satellite dataset available for methane point sources. Here, we present a two-step algorithm called U-Plume for automated detection and quantification of point sources from satellite imagery. The first step delivers plume detection and delineation (masking) with a U-Net machine learning architecture for image segmentation. The second step quantifies the point-source rate from the masked plume using wind speed information and either a convolutional neural network (CNN) or a physics-based integrated mass enhancement (IME) method. The algorithm can process 62 images (each measuring 128 pixels × 128 pixels) per second on a single 2.6 GHz Intel Core i7-9750H CPU. We train the algorithm using large-eddy simulations of methane plumes superimposed on noisy and variable methane background scenes from the GHGSat-C1 satellite instrument. We introduce the concept of point-source observability, Ops=Q/(UWΔB), as a single dimensionless number to predict plume detectability and source rate quantification error from an instrument as a function of source rate Q, wind speed U, instrument pixel size W, and instrument-dependent background noise ΔB. We show that Ops can powerfully diagnose the ability of an imaging instrument to observe point sources of a certain magnitude under given conditions. U-Plume successfully detects and masks plumes from sources as small as 100 kg h−1 in GHGSat-C1 images over surfaces with low background noise and successfully handles larger point sources over surfaces with substantial background noise. We find that the IME method for source quantification is unbiased over the full range of source rates, while the CNN method is biased towards the mean of its training range. The total error in source rate quantification is dominated by wind speed at low wind speeds and by the masking algorithm at high wind speeds. A wind speed of 2–4 m s−1 is optimal for detection and quantification of point sources from satellite data.
期刊介绍:
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT) is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of advances in remote sensing, in-situ and laboratory measurement techniques for the constituents and properties of the Earth’s atmosphere.
The main subject areas comprise the development, intercomparison and validation of measurement instruments and techniques of data processing and information retrieval for gases, aerosols, and clouds. The manuscript types considered for peer-reviewed publication are research articles, review articles, and commentaries.