{"title":"作为科学与政策接口的智用清单--台湾湿地保护政策中的科学与政策互动","authors":"Chen-Guang Lee","doi":"10.1007/s13157-024-01810-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ‘Wise-Use Checklist’ was designed to assist people in formulating the ‘Conservation–Utilisation Plans for Wetlands of Importance’ in Taiwanese wetland conservation policy programme. Feedback from the planning teams, however, indicated that the checklist was difficult to use. Therefore, this research employed the perspective of science–policy interface to understand the barriers people were experiencing while implementing the checklist and identify the factors influencing the governance between science and policy in wetland conservation. The study mainly focused on the period from 2013 to 2015, when the wetland conservation policy was transformed into legislation and regulations in Taiwan. Semi-structured interviews were used to understand the thoughts of planners who participated in the formulation of the ‘Conservation–Utilisation Plans for Wetlands of Importance’. The interviews revealed that the main barrier to the planners was the uncertainty produced by perception divergence, technical difficulties, and policy–institutional barriers, rather than the checklist itself. The responses identified tensions and governance issues among the scientists and between the scientists and policymakers with respect to wetland conservation policies. The research yielded two findings in the aspect of the science-policy interfaces themselves, and six areas for discussion in the aspect of governance between wetland scientists and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23640,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Wise-Use Checklist as a Science–Policy Interface– The Interaction of Science and Policy in Taiwanese Wetland Conservation Policy\",\"authors\":\"Chen-Guang Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13157-024-01810-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The ‘Wise-Use Checklist’ was designed to assist people in formulating the ‘Conservation–Utilisation Plans for Wetlands of Importance’ in Taiwanese wetland conservation policy programme. Feedback from the planning teams, however, indicated that the checklist was difficult to use. Therefore, this research employed the perspective of science–policy interface to understand the barriers people were experiencing while implementing the checklist and identify the factors influencing the governance between science and policy in wetland conservation. The study mainly focused on the period from 2013 to 2015, when the wetland conservation policy was transformed into legislation and regulations in Taiwan. Semi-structured interviews were used to understand the thoughts of planners who participated in the formulation of the ‘Conservation–Utilisation Plans for Wetlands of Importance’. The interviews revealed that the main barrier to the planners was the uncertainty produced by perception divergence, technical difficulties, and policy–institutional barriers, rather than the checklist itself. The responses identified tensions and governance issues among the scientists and between the scientists and policymakers with respect to wetland conservation policies. The research yielded two findings in the aspect of the science-policy interfaces themselves, and six areas for discussion in the aspect of governance between wetland scientists and policymakers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wetlands\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wetlands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01810-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01810-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Wise-Use Checklist as a Science–Policy Interface– The Interaction of Science and Policy in Taiwanese Wetland Conservation Policy
The ‘Wise-Use Checklist’ was designed to assist people in formulating the ‘Conservation–Utilisation Plans for Wetlands of Importance’ in Taiwanese wetland conservation policy programme. Feedback from the planning teams, however, indicated that the checklist was difficult to use. Therefore, this research employed the perspective of science–policy interface to understand the barriers people were experiencing while implementing the checklist and identify the factors influencing the governance between science and policy in wetland conservation. The study mainly focused on the period from 2013 to 2015, when the wetland conservation policy was transformed into legislation and regulations in Taiwan. Semi-structured interviews were used to understand the thoughts of planners who participated in the formulation of the ‘Conservation–Utilisation Plans for Wetlands of Importance’. The interviews revealed that the main barrier to the planners was the uncertainty produced by perception divergence, technical difficulties, and policy–institutional barriers, rather than the checklist itself. The responses identified tensions and governance issues among the scientists and between the scientists and policymakers with respect to wetland conservation policies. The research yielded two findings in the aspect of the science-policy interfaces themselves, and six areas for discussion in the aspect of governance between wetland scientists and policymakers.
期刊介绍:
Wetlands is an international journal concerned with all aspects of wetlands biology, ecology, hydrology, water chemistry, soil and sediment characteristics, management, and laws and regulations. The journal is published 6 times per year, with the goal of centralizing the publication of pioneering wetlands work that has otherwise been spread among a myriad of journals. Since wetlands research usually requires an interdisciplinary approach, the journal in not limited to specific disciplines but seeks manuscripts reporting research results from all relevant disciplines. Manuscripts focusing on management topics and regulatory considerations relevant to wetlands are also suitable. Submissions may be in the form of articles or short notes. Timely review articles will also be considered, but the subject and content should be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief (NDSU.wetlands.editor@ndsu.edu) prior to submission. All papers published in Wetlands are reviewed by two qualified peers, an Associate Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief prior to acceptance and publication. All papers must present new information, must be factual and original, and must not have been published elsewhere.