随机移动的动态随机博弈

Ulrich Doraszelski, Kenneth L. Judd
{"title":"随机移动的动态随机博弈","authors":"Ulrich Doraszelski, Kenneth L. Judd","doi":"10.1007/s11129-018-9200-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We reformulate the quality ladder model of Pakes and McGuire, <i>Rand Journal of Economics</i>, <i>25</i>(4), 555–589 (1994) as a dynamic stochastic game with random moves in which each period one firm is picked at random to make an investment decision. Contrasting this model to the standard version with simultaneous moves illustrates the computational advantages of random moves. In particular, the quality ladder model with random moves avoids the curse of dimensionality in computing firms’ expectations over all possible future states and is therefore orders of magnitude faster to solve than its counterpart with simultaneous moves when there are more than just a few firms. Perhaps unexpectedly, the equilibria of the quality ladder model with random moves are practically indistinguishable from those of the model with simultaneous moves.","PeriodicalId":501397,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Marketing and Economics","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic stochastic games with random moves\",\"authors\":\"Ulrich Doraszelski, Kenneth L. Judd\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11129-018-9200-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We reformulate the quality ladder model of Pakes and McGuire, <i>Rand Journal of Economics</i>, <i>25</i>(4), 555–589 (1994) as a dynamic stochastic game with random moves in which each period one firm is picked at random to make an investment decision. Contrasting this model to the standard version with simultaneous moves illustrates the computational advantages of random moves. In particular, the quality ladder model with random moves avoids the curse of dimensionality in computing firms’ expectations over all possible future states and is therefore orders of magnitude faster to solve than its counterpart with simultaneous moves when there are more than just a few firms. Perhaps unexpectedly, the equilibria of the quality ladder model with random moves are practically indistinguishable from those of the model with simultaneous moves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Marketing and Economics\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Marketing and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-018-9200-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Marketing and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-018-9200-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们将 Pakes 和 McGuire 的质量阶梯模型(Rand Journal of Economics,25(4), 555-589 (1994))重新表述为具有随机移动的动态随机博弈,其中每期随机挑选一家公司做出投资决策。将这一模型与同时移动的标准模型进行对比,可以看出随机移动在计算上的优势。特别是,在计算企业对所有可能的未来状态的预期时,随机移动的质量阶梯模型避免了维度诅咒,因此,当企业数量超过几家时,其求解速度要比同时移动的模型快很多。也许出乎意料的是,随机移动质量阶梯模型的均衡点与同时移动模型的均衡点几乎没有区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic stochastic games with random moves
We reformulate the quality ladder model of Pakes and McGuire, Rand Journal of Economics, 25(4), 555–589 (1994) as a dynamic stochastic game with random moves in which each period one firm is picked at random to make an investment decision. Contrasting this model to the standard version with simultaneous moves illustrates the computational advantages of random moves. In particular, the quality ladder model with random moves avoids the curse of dimensionality in computing firms’ expectations over all possible future states and is therefore orders of magnitude faster to solve than its counterpart with simultaneous moves when there are more than just a few firms. Perhaps unexpectedly, the equilibria of the quality ladder model with random moves are practically indistinguishable from those of the model with simultaneous moves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信