{"title":"乌拉尔地区斑岩型铜(钼)矿床的法洛石","authors":"O. Yu. Plotinskaya, E. V. Kovalchuk","doi":"10.1134/s1075701523070206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>The typomorpic features of the minerals of the fahlore group from three porphyry deposits of the Urals: the Mikheevskoe and Tomino porphyry copper deposits (the Southern Urals) and Talitsa porphyry Mo deposit (the Middle Urals) are studied. In the deposits studied, the fahlore- group minerals belong either to late mineral assemblages of the porphyry stage or to subepithermal veins. They vary in composition from tennantite to tetrahedrite with variable Fe and Zn contents. Contents of Cd, Co, Te, Bi, Ag, and Se are usually insignificant. However, an exception is fahlore of late generation from the Mikheevskoe deposit, which is represented by argentotetrahedrite–(Fe) and fahlore associated with bornite from the Tomino deposit, which corresponds to tennantite–tetrahedrite–(Cd) in composition. Most of the studied fahlore-group minerals are not characterized by complicated chemical zoning: they are either homogeneous or comprise a homogeneous core of intermediate tennantite–tetrahedrite composition and a rim with a dominating tetrahedrite end member. This evidences a relatively quiet deposition environment with no sharp variations of physicochemical parameters of ore-forming fluid, which in general is typical of porphyry deposits. Comparison with published data shows that the studied fahlores are similar in composition to those from “transitional” subepithermal mineralization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12719,"journal":{"name":"Geology of Ore Deposits","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fahlores from Porphyry Cu–(Mo) Deposits of the Urals\",\"authors\":\"O. Yu. Plotinskaya, E. V. Kovalchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/s1075701523070206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Abstract</h3><p>The typomorpic features of the minerals of the fahlore group from three porphyry deposits of the Urals: the Mikheevskoe and Tomino porphyry copper deposits (the Southern Urals) and Talitsa porphyry Mo deposit (the Middle Urals) are studied. In the deposits studied, the fahlore- group minerals belong either to late mineral assemblages of the porphyry stage or to subepithermal veins. They vary in composition from tennantite to tetrahedrite with variable Fe and Zn contents. Contents of Cd, Co, Te, Bi, Ag, and Se are usually insignificant. However, an exception is fahlore of late generation from the Mikheevskoe deposit, which is represented by argentotetrahedrite–(Fe) and fahlore associated with bornite from the Tomino deposit, which corresponds to tennantite–tetrahedrite–(Cd) in composition. Most of the studied fahlore-group minerals are not characterized by complicated chemical zoning: they are either homogeneous or comprise a homogeneous core of intermediate tennantite–tetrahedrite composition and a rim with a dominating tetrahedrite end member. This evidences a relatively quiet deposition environment with no sharp variations of physicochemical parameters of ore-forming fluid, which in general is typical of porphyry deposits. Comparison with published data shows that the studied fahlores are similar in composition to those from “transitional” subepithermal mineralization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geology of Ore Deposits\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geology of Ore Deposits\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1134/s1075701523070206\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geology of Ore Deposits","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s1075701523070206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fahlores from Porphyry Cu–(Mo) Deposits of the Urals
Abstract
The typomorpic features of the minerals of the fahlore group from three porphyry deposits of the Urals: the Mikheevskoe and Tomino porphyry copper deposits (the Southern Urals) and Talitsa porphyry Mo deposit (the Middle Urals) are studied. In the deposits studied, the fahlore- group minerals belong either to late mineral assemblages of the porphyry stage or to subepithermal veins. They vary in composition from tennantite to tetrahedrite with variable Fe and Zn contents. Contents of Cd, Co, Te, Bi, Ag, and Se are usually insignificant. However, an exception is fahlore of late generation from the Mikheevskoe deposit, which is represented by argentotetrahedrite–(Fe) and fahlore associated with bornite from the Tomino deposit, which corresponds to tennantite–tetrahedrite–(Cd) in composition. Most of the studied fahlore-group minerals are not characterized by complicated chemical zoning: they are either homogeneous or comprise a homogeneous core of intermediate tennantite–tetrahedrite composition and a rim with a dominating tetrahedrite end member. This evidences a relatively quiet deposition environment with no sharp variations of physicochemical parameters of ore-forming fluid, which in general is typical of porphyry deposits. Comparison with published data shows that the studied fahlores are similar in composition to those from “transitional” subepithermal mineralization.
期刊介绍:
Geology of Ore Deposits is a periodical covering the topic of metallic and nonmetallic mineral deposits, their formation conditions, and spatial and temporal distribution. The journal publishes original scientific articles and reviews on a wide range of problems in theoretical and applied geology. The journal focuses on the following problems: deep geological structure and geodynamic environment of ore formation; distribution pattern of metallogenic zones and mineral deposits; geology and formation environment of large and unique metallic and nonmetallic deposits; mineralogy of metallic and nonmetallic deposits; physicochemical and isotopic characteristics and geochemical environment of ore deposition; evolution of ore-forming systems; radiogeology and radioecology, economic problems in exploring, developing, and mining of ore commodities.