在 C57BL/6J 小鼠体内评估 N-亚硝基乙基异丙基胺(NEIPA)和 N-亚硝基二异丙基胺(NDIPA)的遗传毒性

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Qian Ye , Xingchao Geng , Hua Jiang , Chao Qin , Hui Wu , Sanlong Wang , Hairuo Wen
{"title":"在 C57BL/6J 小鼠体内评估 N-亚硝基乙基异丙基胺(NEIPA)和 N-亚硝基二异丙基胺(NDIPA)的遗传毒性","authors":"Qian Ye ,&nbsp;Xingchao Geng ,&nbsp;Hua Jiang ,&nbsp;Chao Qin ,&nbsp;Hui Wu ,&nbsp;Sanlong Wang ,&nbsp;Hairuo Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.mrgentox.2024.503763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>N-Nitrosamines, known as drug impurities and suspected carcinogens, have drawn significant public concern. In response to drug regulatory needs, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has previously proposed a carcinogenic potency categorization approach based on the N-nitrosamine α-hydroxylation hypothesis, i.e., that N-nitrosamine mutagenicity increases with the number of α-hydrogen atoms. However, this structure-activity relationship has not been fully tested <em>in vivo</em>. NEIPA (N-nitrosoethylisopropylamine) and NDIPA (N-nitrosodiisopropylamine) are small N-Nitrosamines with similar structures, differing in that the former compound has an additional α-hydrogen atom. In this study, NEIPA and NEIPA doses, 25–100 mg/kg, were administered orally to C57BL/6 J mice for seven consecutive days, and their mutation and DNA damage effects were compared. Compared with NDIPA, the mutagenicity and DNA damage potencies of NEIPA (which contains one more α-hydrogen) were much greater. These differences may be related to their distinct metabolic pathways and target organs. This case study confirms the role of α-hydroxyl modification in the mutagenicity of nitrosamines, with oxidation at the α-hydrogen being a crucial step in the formation of mutagens from N-Nitrosamines, and can inform mutagenicity risk assessment and the formulation of regulatory standards for N-nitrosamine impurities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18799,"journal":{"name":"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis","volume":"896 ","pages":"Article 503763"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genotoxicity assessments of N-nitrosoethylisopropylamine (NEIPA) and N-nitrosodiisopropylamine (NDIPA) in the C57BL/6J mouse\",\"authors\":\"Qian Ye ,&nbsp;Xingchao Geng ,&nbsp;Hua Jiang ,&nbsp;Chao Qin ,&nbsp;Hui Wu ,&nbsp;Sanlong Wang ,&nbsp;Hairuo Wen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mrgentox.2024.503763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>N-Nitrosamines, known as drug impurities and suspected carcinogens, have drawn significant public concern. In response to drug regulatory needs, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has previously proposed a carcinogenic potency categorization approach based on the N-nitrosamine α-hydroxylation hypothesis, i.e., that N-nitrosamine mutagenicity increases with the number of α-hydrogen atoms. However, this structure-activity relationship has not been fully tested <em>in vivo</em>. NEIPA (N-nitrosoethylisopropylamine) and NDIPA (N-nitrosodiisopropylamine) are small N-Nitrosamines with similar structures, differing in that the former compound has an additional α-hydrogen atom. In this study, NEIPA and NEIPA doses, 25–100 mg/kg, were administered orally to C57BL/6 J mice for seven consecutive days, and their mutation and DNA damage effects were compared. Compared with NDIPA, the mutagenicity and DNA damage potencies of NEIPA (which contains one more α-hydrogen) were much greater. These differences may be related to their distinct metabolic pathways and target organs. This case study confirms the role of α-hydroxyl modification in the mutagenicity of nitrosamines, with oxidation at the α-hydrogen being a crucial step in the formation of mutagens from N-Nitrosamines, and can inform mutagenicity risk assessment and the formulation of regulatory standards for N-nitrosamine impurities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis\",\"volume\":\"896 \",\"pages\":\"Article 503763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383571824000391\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383571824000391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

被称为药物杂质和疑似致癌物的 N-亚硝胺引起了公众的极大关注。欧洲药品管理局(EMA)曾根据 N-亚硝胺 α-羟基化假说,即 N-亚硝胺的致突变性随 α-氢原子数目的增加而增加,提出了一种致癌效力分类方法,以满足药物监管的需要。然而,这种结构-活性关系尚未在体内得到充分验证。NEIPA(N-亚硝基乙基异丙基胺)和 NDIPA(N-亚硝基二异丙基胺)是结构相似的小型 N-亚硝胺,不同之处在于前者化合物中多了一个 α-氢原子。在这项研究中,连续七天给 C57BL/6 J 小鼠口服 NEIPA 和 NEIPA 剂量(25-100 毫克/千克),比较了它们的突变和 DNA 损伤效应。与 NDIPA 相比,NEIPA(多含一个 α-氢)的致突变性和 DNA 损伤效力要大得多。这些差异可能与它们不同的代谢途径和靶器官有关。本案例研究证实了α-羟基修饰在亚硝胺致突变性中的作用,α-氢的氧化是 N-亚硝胺形成致突变物的关键步骤,可为致突变性风险评估和 N-亚硝胺杂质监管标准的制定提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genotoxicity assessments of N-nitrosoethylisopropylamine (NEIPA) and N-nitrosodiisopropylamine (NDIPA) in the C57BL/6J mouse

N-Nitrosamines, known as drug impurities and suspected carcinogens, have drawn significant public concern. In response to drug regulatory needs, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has previously proposed a carcinogenic potency categorization approach based on the N-nitrosamine α-hydroxylation hypothesis, i.e., that N-nitrosamine mutagenicity increases with the number of α-hydrogen atoms. However, this structure-activity relationship has not been fully tested in vivo. NEIPA (N-nitrosoethylisopropylamine) and NDIPA (N-nitrosodiisopropylamine) are small N-Nitrosamines with similar structures, differing in that the former compound has an additional α-hydrogen atom. In this study, NEIPA and NEIPA doses, 25–100 mg/kg, were administered orally to C57BL/6 J mice for seven consecutive days, and their mutation and DNA damage effects were compared. Compared with NDIPA, the mutagenicity and DNA damage potencies of NEIPA (which contains one more α-hydrogen) were much greater. These differences may be related to their distinct metabolic pathways and target organs. This case study confirms the role of α-hydroxyl modification in the mutagenicity of nitrosamines, with oxidation at the α-hydrogen being a crucial step in the formation of mutagens from N-Nitrosamines, and can inform mutagenicity risk assessment and the formulation of regulatory standards for N-nitrosamine impurities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
84
审稿时长
105 days
期刊介绍: Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis (MRGTEM) publishes papers advancing knowledge in the field of genetic toxicology. Papers are welcomed in the following areas: New developments in genotoxicity testing of chemical agents (e.g. improvements in methodology of assay systems and interpretation of results). Alternatives to and refinement of the use of animals in genotoxicity testing. Nano-genotoxicology, the study of genotoxicity hazards and risks related to novel man-made nanomaterials. Studies of epigenetic changes in relation to genotoxic effects. The use of structure-activity relationships in predicting genotoxic effects. The isolation and chemical characterization of novel environmental mutagens. The measurement of genotoxic effects in human populations, when accompanied by quantitative measurements of environmental or occupational exposures. The application of novel technologies for assessing the hazard and risks associated with genotoxic substances (e.g. OMICS or other high-throughput approaches to genotoxicity testing). MRGTEM is now accepting submissions for a new section of the journal: Current Topics in Genotoxicity Testing, that will be dedicated to the discussion of current issues relating to design, interpretation and strategic use of genotoxicity tests. This section is envisaged to include discussions relating to the development of new international testing guidelines, but also to wider topics in the field. The evaluation of contrasting or opposing viewpoints is welcomed as long as the presentation is in accordance with the journal''s aims, scope, and policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信