超声心动图在估计液体反应性方面的实用性。

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of clinical medicine research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-30 DOI:10.14740/jocmr5114
Nnedindu Asogwa, Marc Assaad, Joanne Ling, Gennifer Wahbah Makhoul, Halim El Hage
{"title":"超声心动图在估计液体反应性方面的实用性。","authors":"Nnedindu Asogwa, Marc Assaad, Joanne Ling, Gennifer Wahbah Makhoul, Halim El Hage","doi":"10.14740/jocmr5114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing the volume status in critically ill patients is the key to maintain the stability of the hemodynamics; however, it can be challenging to view the complexity of cases and the diversity of shock etiology. Multiple noninvasive means have been used to study the effectiveness of volume resuscitation, but none of them have been used as gold standard. We aim to illustrate the most used techniques: left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral versus inferior vena cava compressibility index, and highlight their limitations and strengths. These tools are both operator-dependent and might be affected by several factors including ventilator settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical medicine research","volume":"16 4","pages":"129-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Utility of Echocardiography in Estimating Fluid Responsiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Nnedindu Asogwa, Marc Assaad, Joanne Ling, Gennifer Wahbah Makhoul, Halim El Hage\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/jocmr5114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessing the volume status in critically ill patients is the key to maintain the stability of the hemodynamics; however, it can be challenging to view the complexity of cases and the diversity of shock etiology. Multiple noninvasive means have been used to study the effectiveness of volume resuscitation, but none of them have been used as gold standard. We aim to illustrate the most used techniques: left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral versus inferior vena cava compressibility index, and highlight their limitations and strengths. These tools are both operator-dependent and might be affected by several factors including ventilator settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical medicine research\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"129-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073387/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical medicine research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr5114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical medicine research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr5114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估危重病人的容量状态是维持血液动力学稳定的关键;然而,由于病例的复杂性和休克病因的多样性,评估容量状态具有挑战性。已有多种无创方法用于研究容量复苏的有效性,但没有一种方法被用作金标准。我们旨在说明最常用的技术:左心室流出道速度时间积分与下腔静脉压缩指数,并强调它们的局限性和优势。这些工具都依赖于操作者,并可能受到包括呼吸机设置在内的多种因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Utility of Echocardiography in Estimating Fluid Responsiveness.

Assessing the volume status in critically ill patients is the key to maintain the stability of the hemodynamics; however, it can be challenging to view the complexity of cases and the diversity of shock etiology. Multiple noninvasive means have been used to study the effectiveness of volume resuscitation, but none of them have been used as gold standard. We aim to illustrate the most used techniques: left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral versus inferior vena cava compressibility index, and highlight their limitations and strengths. These tools are both operator-dependent and might be affected by several factors including ventilator settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信