髓内钉治疗不可复发的螺旋形转子下骨折:髓内钉与非髓内钉接线的比较。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"髓内钉治疗不可复发的螺旋形转子下骨折:髓内钉与非髓内钉接线的比较。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Intramedullary nailing is the preferred internal fixation technique for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures because of its biomechanical advantages. However, no definitive conclusion has been reached regarding whether combined cable cerclage is required during intramedullary nailing treatment. This study is performed to compare the clinical effects of intramedullary nailing with cerclage and non-cerclage wiring in the treatment of irreducible spiral subtrochanteric fractures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with subtrochanteric fractures admitted to our center from January 2013 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were enrolled in the case-control study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into the non-cerclage group and the cerclage group. The patients' clinical data, including the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, reoperation rate, fracture union time, and Harris hip score, were compared between these 2 groups. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed with Student's <em>t</em>-test. Non-normally distributed variables were expressed as median (Q<sub>1</sub>, Q<sub>3</sub>) and assessed using the Mann-Whitney test. A <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05 was considered significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 69 patients were included in the study (35 patients in the non-cerclage group and 34 patients in the cerclage group). The baseline data of the 2 groups were comparable. There were no significant difference in the length of hospital stay (z = -0.391, <em>p</em> = 0.696), operative time (z = -1.289, <em>p</em> = 0.197), or intraoperative blood loss (z = -1.321, <em>p</em> = 0.186). However, compared with non-cerclage group, the fracture union time was shorter (z = -5.587, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), the rate of nonunion was lower (<em>χ</em><sup>2</sup> = 6.030, <em>p</em> = 0.03), the anatomical reduction rate was higher (<em>χ</em><sup>2</sup> = 5.449, <em>p</em> = 0.03), and the Harris hip score was higher (z = -2.99, <em>p</em> = 0.003) in the cerclage group, all with statistically significant differences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intramedullary nailing combined with cable cerclage wiring is a safe and reliable technique for the treatment of irreducible subtrochanteric fractures. This technique can improve the reduction effect, increase the stability of fracture fixation, shorten the fracture union time, reduce the occurrence of nonunion, and contribute to the recovery of hip joint function.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51555,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","volume":"27 5","pages":"Pages 305-310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127524000385/pdfft?md5=304525529b2a86d5f0f0ed5981e0319c&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127524000385-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intramedullary nailing for irreducible spiral subtrochanteric fractures: A comparison of cerclage and non-cerclage wiring\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Intramedullary nailing is the preferred internal fixation technique for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures because of its biomechanical advantages. However, no definitive conclusion has been reached regarding whether combined cable cerclage is required during intramedullary nailing treatment. This study is performed to compare the clinical effects of intramedullary nailing with cerclage and non-cerclage wiring in the treatment of irreducible spiral subtrochanteric fractures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with subtrochanteric fractures admitted to our center from January 2013 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were enrolled in the case-control study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into the non-cerclage group and the cerclage group. The patients' clinical data, including the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, reoperation rate, fracture union time, and Harris hip score, were compared between these 2 groups. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed with Student's <em>t</em>-test. Non-normally distributed variables were expressed as median (Q<sub>1</sub>, Q<sub>3</sub>) and assessed using the Mann-Whitney test. A <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05 was considered significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 69 patients were included in the study (35 patients in the non-cerclage group and 34 patients in the cerclage group). The baseline data of the 2 groups were comparable. There were no significant difference in the length of hospital stay (z = -0.391, <em>p</em> = 0.696), operative time (z = -1.289, <em>p</em> = 0.197), or intraoperative blood loss (z = -1.321, <em>p</em> = 0.186). However, compared with non-cerclage group, the fracture union time was shorter (z = -5.587, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), the rate of nonunion was lower (<em>χ</em><sup>2</sup> = 6.030, <em>p</em> = 0.03), the anatomical reduction rate was higher (<em>χ</em><sup>2</sup> = 5.449, <em>p</em> = 0.03), and the Harris hip score was higher (z = -2.99, <em>p</em> = 0.003) in the cerclage group, all with statistically significant differences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intramedullary nailing combined with cable cerclage wiring is a safe and reliable technique for the treatment of irreducible subtrochanteric fractures. This technique can improve the reduction effect, increase the stability of fracture fixation, shorten the fracture union time, reduce the occurrence of nonunion, and contribute to the recovery of hip joint function.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 305-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127524000385/pdfft?md5=304525529b2a86d5f0f0ed5981e0319c&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127524000385-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127524000385\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127524000385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:髓内钉因其生物力学优势而成为治疗机械下骨折的首选内固定技术。然而,关于在髓内钉治疗过程中是否需要联合电缆卡环,目前还没有明确的结论。本研究旨在比较在治疗不可复发的螺旋形转子下骨折时,髓内钉加套线和不加套线的临床效果:回顾性分析2013年1月至2021年12月期间本中心收治的转子下骨折患者。根据纳入和排除标准将患者纳入病例对照研究,并将其分为非卡环组和卡环组。比较两组患者的临床数据,包括手术时间、术中失血量、住院时间、再次手术率、骨折愈合时间和 Harris 髋关节评分。分类变量的比较采用卡方检验(Chi-square)或费雪精确检验(Fisher's exact test)。正态分布的连续变量用均数±标准差表示,并用学生 t 检验进行分析。非正态分布变量以中位数(Q1、Q3)表示,并使用 Mann-Whitney 检验进行评估。A p 值 结果:本研究共纳入 69 名患者(非卡环组 35 名,卡环组 34 名)。两组患者的基线数据具有可比性。住院时间(z=-0.391,p=0.696)、手术时间(z=-1.289,p=0.197)和术中失血量(z=-1.321,p=0.186)均无明显差异。然而,与非卡环组相比,卡环组的骨折愈合时间更短(z = -5.587,p 2 = 6.030,p = 0.03),解剖复位率更高(χ2 = 5.449,p = 0.03),Harris髋关节评分更高(z = -2.99,p = 0.003),差异均有统计学意义:结论:髓内钉结合钢缆cerclage布线是治疗不可复位转子下骨折的一种安全可靠的技术。结论:髓内钉联合缆索环扎术是治疗不可复位转子下骨折的一种安全可靠的技术,该技术可提高复位效果,增加骨折固定的稳定性,缩短骨折愈合时间,减少骨折不愈合的发生,有助于髋关节功能的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intramedullary nailing for irreducible spiral subtrochanteric fractures: A comparison of cerclage and non-cerclage wiring

Purpose

Intramedullary nailing is the preferred internal fixation technique for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures because of its biomechanical advantages. However, no definitive conclusion has been reached regarding whether combined cable cerclage is required during intramedullary nailing treatment. This study is performed to compare the clinical effects of intramedullary nailing with cerclage and non-cerclage wiring in the treatment of irreducible spiral subtrochanteric fractures.

Methods

Patients with subtrochanteric fractures admitted to our center from January 2013 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were enrolled in the case-control study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into the non-cerclage group and the cerclage group. The patients' clinical data, including the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, reoperation rate, fracture union time, and Harris hip score, were compared between these 2 groups. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed with Student's t-test. Non-normally distributed variables were expressed as median (Q1, Q3) and assessed using the Mann-Whitney test. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

In total, 69 patients were included in the study (35 patients in the non-cerclage group and 34 patients in the cerclage group). The baseline data of the 2 groups were comparable. There were no significant difference in the length of hospital stay (z = -0.391, p = 0.696), operative time (z = -1.289, p = 0.197), or intraoperative blood loss (z = -1.321, p = 0.186). However, compared with non-cerclage group, the fracture union time was shorter (z = -5.587, p < 0.001), the rate of nonunion was lower (χ2 = 6.030, p = 0.03), the anatomical reduction rate was higher (χ2 = 5.449, p = 0.03), and the Harris hip score was higher (z = -2.99, p = 0.003) in the cerclage group, all with statistically significant differences.

Conclusions

Intramedullary nailing combined with cable cerclage wiring is a safe and reliable technique for the treatment of irreducible subtrochanteric fractures. This technique can improve the reduction effect, increase the stability of fracture fixation, shorten the fracture union time, reduce the occurrence of nonunion, and contribute to the recovery of hip joint function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1707
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Traumatology (CJT, ISSN 1008-1275) was launched in 1998 and is a peer-reviewed English journal authorized by Chinese Association of Trauma, Chinese Medical Association. It is multidisciplinary and designed to provide the most current and relevant information for both the clinical and basic research in the field of traumatic medicine. CJT primarily publishes expert forums, original papers, case reports and so on. Topics cover trauma system and management, surgical procedures, acute care, rehabilitation, post-traumatic complications, translational medicine, traffic medicine and other related areas. The journal especially emphasizes clinical application, technique, surgical video, guideline, recommendations for more effective surgical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信