俯卧位暴力患者的物理约束对呼吸质量的影响:一项试点模拟研究。

Neuro endocrinology letters Pub Date : 2024-04-07
Patrik Christian Cmorej, Ondřej Kounovský, Petr Bureš, Dana Rebeka Ralbovská, Jaroslav Pekara
{"title":"俯卧位暴力患者的物理约束对呼吸质量的影响:一项试点模拟研究。","authors":"Patrik Christian Cmorej, Ondřej Kounovský, Petr Bureš, Dana Rebeka Ralbovská, Jaroslav Pekara","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Physical restraint in the prone position is still utilized in healthcare facilities to immobilize violent patients. It is associated with the sudden death of violent patients. The aim of this study is to objectify the impact of physical restraint in the prone position on spirometric and ventilatory parameters.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A pilot simulation study.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ten university students were included in the study. They underwent two types of physical restraint: in the prone position with \"chest kneeling\" and in the lateral position. Spirometric parameters (FVC, PEF and FEV1%) and ventilatory parameters (EtCO2 and respiratory rate) were measured before initiation and after five minutes of physical restraint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both methods of physical restraint resulted in a decrease in FVC (p = 0.005 or p = 0.047) and PEF (p = 0.005 or p = 0.028). No significant changes were observed in EtCO2 and respiratory rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physical restraint in the prone position should not be used in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":94154,"journal":{"name":"Neuro endocrinology letters","volume":"45 2","pages":"91-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Physical Restraint on a Violent Patient in the Prone Position on the Quality of Breathing: A Pilot Simulation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Patrik Christian Cmorej, Ondřej Kounovský, Petr Bureš, Dana Rebeka Ralbovská, Jaroslav Pekara\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Physical restraint in the prone position is still utilized in healthcare facilities to immobilize violent patients. It is associated with the sudden death of violent patients. The aim of this study is to objectify the impact of physical restraint in the prone position on spirometric and ventilatory parameters.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A pilot simulation study.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ten university students were included in the study. They underwent two types of physical restraint: in the prone position with \\\"chest kneeling\\\" and in the lateral position. Spirometric parameters (FVC, PEF and FEV1%) and ventilatory parameters (EtCO2 and respiratory rate) were measured before initiation and after five minutes of physical restraint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both methods of physical restraint resulted in a decrease in FVC (p = 0.005 or p = 0.047) and PEF (p = 0.005 or p = 0.028). No significant changes were observed in EtCO2 and respiratory rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physical restraint in the prone position should not be used in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro endocrinology letters\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"91-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro endocrinology letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro endocrinology letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:医疗机构仍在使用俯卧位的物理约束来固定有暴力倾向的病人。它与暴力患者的猝死有关。本研究旨在确定俯卧位物理约束对肺活量和通气参数的影响:材料和方法:研究对象包括 10 名大学生。他们接受了两种类型的物理约束:俯卧位 "胸跪 "和侧卧位。在开始物理约束前和五分钟后测量了肺活量参数(FVC、PEF 和 FEV1%)和通气参数(EtCO2 和呼吸频率):两种物理约束方法都会导致 FVC(p = 0.005 或 p = 0.047)和 PEF(p = 0.005 或 p = 0.028)下降。结论:结论:医疗保健中不应使用俯卧位物理约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Physical Restraint on a Violent Patient in the Prone Position on the Quality of Breathing: A Pilot Simulation Study.

Objectives: Physical restraint in the prone position is still utilized in healthcare facilities to immobilize violent patients. It is associated with the sudden death of violent patients. The aim of this study is to objectify the impact of physical restraint in the prone position on spirometric and ventilatory parameters.

Design: A pilot simulation study.

Material and methods: Ten university students were included in the study. They underwent two types of physical restraint: in the prone position with "chest kneeling" and in the lateral position. Spirometric parameters (FVC, PEF and FEV1%) and ventilatory parameters (EtCO2 and respiratory rate) were measured before initiation and after five minutes of physical restraint.

Results: Both methods of physical restraint resulted in a decrease in FVC (p = 0.005 or p = 0.047) and PEF (p = 0.005 or p = 0.028). No significant changes were observed in EtCO2 and respiratory rate.

Conclusion: Physical restraint in the prone position should not be used in healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信