旋转的孤独Coronavirus and the Philosopher.

Sophia (Melbourne, Vic.) Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-28 DOI:10.1007/s11841-021-00859-z
Sanjit Chakraborty
{"title":"旋转的孤独Coronavirus and the Philosopher.","authors":"Sanjit Chakraborty","doi":"10.1007/s11841-021-00859-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This fictionalized script (fictional dialogue between Coronavirus and the Philosopher) traces the contours of the conversation that seeks to fathom the crisis unleashed by the outbreak and global spread of the coronavirus (COVID-19 pandemic) and the ensuing anxieties created in our current social living. The scenario of deepened isolation of the self from the other (social distancing and 'stay-at-home' or various lockdowns) is considered, and it is proposed (by the philosopher, I presume) that isolation, while an unavoidable requirement, does not mean it is some mental lassitude but rather may be seen as an enthusiastic concern toward recovering physical and mental wellbeing of the larger communities concerned to control the possible avenues of transmission of the contagion. The conversation meanders around the issue of quarantine, its attraction or otherwise, and who benefits from this restriction, its effects on one's mental constitution, etc. Philosophers have been known to isolate themselves in other contexts and situations (Yājñavalkya and the Buddha withdrawing to the forest; the Jain mendicants crossing \"the ford\"; the Stoics withdrawing from society, Nietzsche's retreating regularly to the sanatorium; Heidegger to the Black Forest; Kant's unsocial sociability and Wittgenstein living lonesome lives, etc.) give us a taste of what is to come in the dialogue to resist the calamity of the coronavirus and its grim effects that engulf the entire humanity.</p>","PeriodicalId":74845,"journal":{"name":"Sophia (Melbourne, Vic.)","volume":"60 3","pages":"769-774"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinning Solitude: Coronavirus and the Philosopher.\",\"authors\":\"Sanjit Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11841-021-00859-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This fictionalized script (fictional dialogue between Coronavirus and the Philosopher) traces the contours of the conversation that seeks to fathom the crisis unleashed by the outbreak and global spread of the coronavirus (COVID-19 pandemic) and the ensuing anxieties created in our current social living. The scenario of deepened isolation of the self from the other (social distancing and 'stay-at-home' or various lockdowns) is considered, and it is proposed (by the philosopher, I presume) that isolation, while an unavoidable requirement, does not mean it is some mental lassitude but rather may be seen as an enthusiastic concern toward recovering physical and mental wellbeing of the larger communities concerned to control the possible avenues of transmission of the contagion. The conversation meanders around the issue of quarantine, its attraction or otherwise, and who benefits from this restriction, its effects on one's mental constitution, etc. Philosophers have been known to isolate themselves in other contexts and situations (Yājñavalkya and the Buddha withdrawing to the forest; the Jain mendicants crossing \\\"the ford\\\"; the Stoics withdrawing from society, Nietzsche's retreating regularly to the sanatorium; Heidegger to the Black Forest; Kant's unsocial sociability and Wittgenstein living lonesome lives, etc.) give us a taste of what is to come in the dialogue to resist the calamity of the coronavirus and its grim effects that engulf the entire humanity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sophia (Melbourne, Vic.)\",\"volume\":\"60 3\",\"pages\":\"769-774\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316706/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sophia (Melbourne, Vic.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-021-00859-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sophia (Melbourne, Vic.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-021-00859-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇虚构的剧本(冠状病毒与哲学家之间的虚构对话)追溯了对话的轮廓,试图探究冠状病毒(COVID-19 大流行病)的爆发和全球传播所引发的危机,以及我们当前社会生活中随之产生的焦虑。我们考虑了自我与他人隔离加深的情况(社会疏远和 "宅在家里 "或各种封锁),并提出(我猜是哲学家提出的),隔离虽然是一种不可避免的要求,但并不意味着精神上的倦怠,相反,它可以被看作是对更大群体恢复身心健康的热情关注,以控制传染病可能的传播途径。谈话围绕隔离问题展开,包括隔离的吸引力与否、谁能从这种限制中受益、隔离对人的精神体质的影响等。众所周知,哲学家们会在其他环境和情况下与世隔绝(雅迦瓦克和佛陀隐居森林;耆那教修行者穿越 "岔路";斯多葛派远离社会;尼采定期隐居疗养院;海德格尔隐居黑森林;康德不善交际,维特根斯坦过着孤独的生活,等等)。在抵御冠状病毒灾难及其席卷全人类的恶劣影响的对话中,我们可以从中领略到些什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spinning Solitude: Coronavirus and the Philosopher.

This fictionalized script (fictional dialogue between Coronavirus and the Philosopher) traces the contours of the conversation that seeks to fathom the crisis unleashed by the outbreak and global spread of the coronavirus (COVID-19 pandemic) and the ensuing anxieties created in our current social living. The scenario of deepened isolation of the self from the other (social distancing and 'stay-at-home' or various lockdowns) is considered, and it is proposed (by the philosopher, I presume) that isolation, while an unavoidable requirement, does not mean it is some mental lassitude but rather may be seen as an enthusiastic concern toward recovering physical and mental wellbeing of the larger communities concerned to control the possible avenues of transmission of the contagion. The conversation meanders around the issue of quarantine, its attraction or otherwise, and who benefits from this restriction, its effects on one's mental constitution, etc. Philosophers have been known to isolate themselves in other contexts and situations (Yājñavalkya and the Buddha withdrawing to the forest; the Jain mendicants crossing "the ford"; the Stoics withdrawing from society, Nietzsche's retreating regularly to the sanatorium; Heidegger to the Black Forest; Kant's unsocial sociability and Wittgenstein living lonesome lives, etc.) give us a taste of what is to come in the dialogue to resist the calamity of the coronavirus and its grim effects that engulf the entire humanity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信