APRI 和 FIB-4 评分在预测慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化方面的成功率有多高?

Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology Pub Date : 2023-12-29 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.36519/idcm.2023.276
Deniz Gür-Altunay, Pınar Yürük-Atasoy
{"title":"APRI 和 FIB-4 评分在预测慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化方面的成功率有多高?","authors":"Deniz Gür-Altunay, Pınar Yürük-Atasoy","doi":"10.36519/idcm.2023.276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the correlation of fibrosis severity in liver biopsies, the gold standard for the diagnosis of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), using noninvasive methods such as the aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included patients who were followed and treated for CHB in 2018-2023. Biochemical markers and liver biopsy findings of the cases were retrospectively, and their correlations with APRI and FIB-4, which are noninvasive scores, were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 202 patients. The biochemical markers and liver biopsy findings of the cases were examined retrospectively, and their correlations with the noninvasive scores APRI and FIB-4 were compared. According to liver biopsy results, 109 (54.0%) cases had no fibrosis (stage 0.1), 85 (42.1%) cases had mild fibrosis (stage 2, 3), and 8 (4%) cases had severe fibrosis (stage 4, 5, 6). The median FIB-4 score was 0.79 (0.25 -11.74), and the median APRI score was 0.29 (0.10-29.40). When the predictive power of the APRI score to discriminate between \"without fibrosis\" and \"with fibrosis (mild and severe)\" was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, for the APRI score >0.408 as the ideal cut-off point, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 34% and 79%, respectively. When the cut-off point for the FIB-4 score was >0.701, the sensitivity and specificity were 71% and 46%, respectively. Although the area under the curve (AUC) ratios ranged between 52% and 64% in the ROC analyses, the sensitivity ratios of the cut-off points calculated for FIB-4 were higher. The likelihood ratios of the cut-off point we found for the APRI score (1.61 and 1.75, respectively) were relatively better than those for FIB-4 (1.31 and 1.41, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Noninvasive tests used to detect liver fibrosis in individuals with CHB do not eliminate the need for liver biopsy but may provide insight into the fibrosis status of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":519881,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology","volume":"5 4","pages":"332-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Successful Are APRI and FIB-4 Scores in Predicting Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients?\",\"authors\":\"Deniz Gür-Altunay, Pınar Yürük-Atasoy\",\"doi\":\"10.36519/idcm.2023.276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the correlation of fibrosis severity in liver biopsies, the gold standard for the diagnosis of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), using noninvasive methods such as the aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included patients who were followed and treated for CHB in 2018-2023. Biochemical markers and liver biopsy findings of the cases were retrospectively, and their correlations with APRI and FIB-4, which are noninvasive scores, were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 202 patients. The biochemical markers and liver biopsy findings of the cases were examined retrospectively, and their correlations with the noninvasive scores APRI and FIB-4 were compared. According to liver biopsy results, 109 (54.0%) cases had no fibrosis (stage 0.1), 85 (42.1%) cases had mild fibrosis (stage 2, 3), and 8 (4%) cases had severe fibrosis (stage 4, 5, 6). The median FIB-4 score was 0.79 (0.25 -11.74), and the median APRI score was 0.29 (0.10-29.40). When the predictive power of the APRI score to discriminate between \\\"without fibrosis\\\" and \\\"with fibrosis (mild and severe)\\\" was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, for the APRI score >0.408 as the ideal cut-off point, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 34% and 79%, respectively. When the cut-off point for the FIB-4 score was >0.701, the sensitivity and specificity were 71% and 46%, respectively. Although the area under the curve (AUC) ratios ranged between 52% and 64% in the ROC analyses, the sensitivity ratios of the cut-off points calculated for FIB-4 were higher. The likelihood ratios of the cut-off point we found for the APRI score (1.61 and 1.75, respectively) were relatively better than those for FIB-4 (1.31 and 1.41, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Noninvasive tests used to detect liver fibrosis in individuals with CHB do not eliminate the need for liver biopsy but may provide insight into the fibrosis status of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"332-340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986711/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36519/idcm.2023.276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/idcm.2023.276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们旨在使用天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)-血小板比值指数(APRI)和纤维化-4评分(FIB-4)等无创方法,评估作为诊断慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者金标准的肝活检中纤维化严重程度的相关性:研究纳入2018-2023年随访和治疗的CHB患者。回顾性分析病例的生化指标和肝活检结果,并比较其与APRI和FIB-4(非侵入性评分)的相关性:研究包括 202 名患者。回顾性研究了病例的生化指标和肝活检结果,并比较了它们与无创评分 APRI 和 FIB-4 的相关性。根据肝活检结果,109 例(54.0%)无纤维化(0.1 期),85 例(42.1%)轻度纤维化(2、3 期),8 例(4%)重度纤维化(4、5、6 期)。FIB-4 评分中位数为 0.79(0.25 -11.74),APRI 评分中位数为 0.29(0.10-29.40)。通过接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)分析评估 APRI 分值对 "无纤维化 "和 "纤维化(轻度和重度)"的预测能力时发现,以 APRI 分值大于 0.408 为理想分界点,灵敏度和特异度分别为 34% 和 79%。当 FIB-4 评分的临界点大于 0.701 时,灵敏度和特异性分别为 71% 和 46% 。虽然在 ROC 分析中,曲线下面积(AUC)比率介于 52% 和 64% 之间,但 FIB-4 临界点的灵敏度比率更高。我们发现 APRI 评分的临界点似然比(分别为 1.61 和 1.75)相对优于 FIB-4 的临界点似然比(分别为 1.31 和 1.41):结论:用于检测慢性阻塞性肺病患者肝纤维化的无创检验并不能消除肝活检的必要性,但可以帮助了解患者的肝纤维化状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Successful Are APRI and FIB-4 Scores in Predicting Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients?

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the correlation of fibrosis severity in liver biopsies, the gold standard for the diagnosis of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), using noninvasive methods such as the aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4).

Materials and methods: The study included patients who were followed and treated for CHB in 2018-2023. Biochemical markers and liver biopsy findings of the cases were retrospectively, and their correlations with APRI and FIB-4, which are noninvasive scores, were compared.

Results: The study included 202 patients. The biochemical markers and liver biopsy findings of the cases were examined retrospectively, and their correlations with the noninvasive scores APRI and FIB-4 were compared. According to liver biopsy results, 109 (54.0%) cases had no fibrosis (stage 0.1), 85 (42.1%) cases had mild fibrosis (stage 2, 3), and 8 (4%) cases had severe fibrosis (stage 4, 5, 6). The median FIB-4 score was 0.79 (0.25 -11.74), and the median APRI score was 0.29 (0.10-29.40). When the predictive power of the APRI score to discriminate between "without fibrosis" and "with fibrosis (mild and severe)" was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, for the APRI score >0.408 as the ideal cut-off point, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 34% and 79%, respectively. When the cut-off point for the FIB-4 score was >0.701, the sensitivity and specificity were 71% and 46%, respectively. Although the area under the curve (AUC) ratios ranged between 52% and 64% in the ROC analyses, the sensitivity ratios of the cut-off points calculated for FIB-4 were higher. The likelihood ratios of the cut-off point we found for the APRI score (1.61 and 1.75, respectively) were relatively better than those for FIB-4 (1.31 and 1.41, respectively).

Conclusion: Noninvasive tests used to detect liver fibrosis in individuals with CHB do not eliminate the need for liver biopsy but may provide insight into the fibrosis status of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信