{"title":"模拟提高了急诊科住院医生在主动脉护理点超声检查中的临床表现。","authors":"Brandon M Wubben, Cory Wittrock","doi":"10.5811/westjem.18449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to diagnose abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an essential skill in emergency medicine (EM). While simulation-based POCUS education is commonly used, the translation to performance in the emergency department (ED) is unknown. We investigated whether adding case-based simulation to an EM residency curriculum was associated with changes in the quantity and quality of aorta POCUS performed by residents in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-based simulation was introduced to resident didactics at our academic, Level I trauma center. A case of undifferentiated abdominal pain was presented, which required examination of an ultrasound phantom to diagnose an AAA, with a hands-on didactic. We compared the quantity, quality, and descriptive analyses of aorta POCUS performed in the ED during the four months before and after the simulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For participating residents (17/32), there was an 86% increase in total studies and an 80% increase in clinical studies. On an opportunity-adjusted, per-resident basis, there was no significant difference in median total scans per 100 shifts (4.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-15.8 vs 8.3 [IQR] 3.3-23.6, <i>P</i> = 0.21) or average total quality scores (3.2 ± 0.6 vs 3.2 ± 0.5, <i>P</i> = 0.92). The total number of limited or inadequate studies decreased (43% vs 19%, <i>P</i> = 0.02), and the proportion of scans submitted by interns increased (7% vs 54%, <i>P</i> = < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After simulation training, aorta POCUS was performed more frequently, and ED interns contributed a higher proportion of scans. While there was no improvement in quantity or quality scores on a per-resident basis, there were significantly fewer incomplete or limited scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"205-208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation Improves Emergency Medicine Residents' Clinical Performance of Aorta Point-of-Care Ultrasound.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon M Wubben, Cory Wittrock\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.18449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to diagnose abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an essential skill in emergency medicine (EM). While simulation-based POCUS education is commonly used, the translation to performance in the emergency department (ED) is unknown. We investigated whether adding case-based simulation to an EM residency curriculum was associated with changes in the quantity and quality of aorta POCUS performed by residents in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-based simulation was introduced to resident didactics at our academic, Level I trauma center. A case of undifferentiated abdominal pain was presented, which required examination of an ultrasound phantom to diagnose an AAA, with a hands-on didactic. We compared the quantity, quality, and descriptive analyses of aorta POCUS performed in the ED during the four months before and after the simulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For participating residents (17/32), there was an 86% increase in total studies and an 80% increase in clinical studies. On an opportunity-adjusted, per-resident basis, there was no significant difference in median total scans per 100 shifts (4.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-15.8 vs 8.3 [IQR] 3.3-23.6, <i>P</i> = 0.21) or average total quality scores (3.2 ± 0.6 vs 3.2 ± 0.5, <i>P</i> = 0.92). The total number of limited or inadequate studies decreased (43% vs 19%, <i>P</i> = 0.02), and the proportion of scans submitted by interns increased (7% vs 54%, <i>P</i> = < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After simulation training, aorta POCUS was performed more frequently, and ED interns contributed a higher proportion of scans. While there was no improvement in quantity or quality scores on a per-resident basis, there were significantly fewer incomplete or limited scans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"205-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000555/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18449\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:使用床旁超声(POCUS)诊断腹主动脉瘤(AAA)是急诊医学(EM)的一项基本技能。虽然基于模拟的 POCUS 教育已被普遍采用,但其在急诊科(ED)的应用效果尚不清楚。我们研究了在急诊科住院医师课程中加入基于病例的模拟是否与住院医师在急诊科进行主动脉POCUS的数量和质量的变化有关:方法:我们的一级创伤中心在住院医师教学中引入了基于病例的模拟。方法:我们在一级创伤中心的住院医师教学中引入了一个基于病例的模拟教学,该模拟病例是一个未分化腹痛的病例,需要通过超声幻影检查来诊断 AAA,并进行实际操作。我们比较了模拟前后四个月在急诊室进行的主动脉 POCUS 的数量、质量和描述性分析:参与模拟的住院医师(17/32)中,总检查次数增加了 86%,临床检查次数增加了 80%。经机会调整后,每位住院医师每 100 个班次的扫描总数中位数(4.4 [四分位间范围 (IQR) 0-15.8 vs 8.3 [IQR] 3.3-23.6,P = 0.21)或平均总质量分数(3.2 ± 0.6 vs 3.2 ± 0.5,P = 0.92)无显著差异。有限或不充分研究的总数减少了(43% vs 19%,P = 0.02),而实习生提交的扫描比例增加了(7% vs 54%,P = 结论):模拟训练后,主动脉 POCUS 的执行频率增加,急诊科实习生提交扫描的比例也提高了。虽然按住院医师人数计算的数量或质量得分没有提高,但不完整或有限的扫描次数明显减少。
Simulation Improves Emergency Medicine Residents' Clinical Performance of Aorta Point-of-Care Ultrasound.
Purpose: Using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to diagnose abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an essential skill in emergency medicine (EM). While simulation-based POCUS education is commonly used, the translation to performance in the emergency department (ED) is unknown. We investigated whether adding case-based simulation to an EM residency curriculum was associated with changes in the quantity and quality of aorta POCUS performed by residents in the ED.
Methods: A case-based simulation was introduced to resident didactics at our academic, Level I trauma center. A case of undifferentiated abdominal pain was presented, which required examination of an ultrasound phantom to diagnose an AAA, with a hands-on didactic. We compared the quantity, quality, and descriptive analyses of aorta POCUS performed in the ED during the four months before and after the simulation.
Results: For participating residents (17/32), there was an 86% increase in total studies and an 80% increase in clinical studies. On an opportunity-adjusted, per-resident basis, there was no significant difference in median total scans per 100 shifts (4.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-15.8 vs 8.3 [IQR] 3.3-23.6, P = 0.21) or average total quality scores (3.2 ± 0.6 vs 3.2 ± 0.5, P = 0.92). The total number of limited or inadequate studies decreased (43% vs 19%, P = 0.02), and the proportion of scans submitted by interns increased (7% vs 54%, P = < .001).
Conclusion: After simulation training, aorta POCUS was performed more frequently, and ED interns contributed a higher proportion of scans. While there was no improvement in quantity or quality scores on a per-resident basis, there were significantly fewer incomplete or limited scans.
期刊介绍:
WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.