穿透性创伤胸腔急诊手术中的生化指标。

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
South African Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-03-01
M Lubout, J Goosen, D Kruger, P Fru, S Makhadi, M S Moeng
{"title":"穿透性创伤胸腔急诊手术中的生化指标。","authors":"M Lubout, J Goosen, D Kruger, P Fru, S Makhadi, M S Moeng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Violent interpersonal acts account for a large proportion of unnatural deaths in South Africa. A significant proportion of unnatural deaths are due to penetrating thoracic trauma and preventable haemorrhage. Current indications for emergent thoracotomy are unreliable. We propose the use of lactate, shock index (SI) and base deficit (BD) as a triage tool in patients with penetrating thoracic injuries to identify those requiring surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of the trauma registry of the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) was carried out between March 2011 and March 2016. Four hundred and ninety (490) patients were collected consisting of a non-operative group of 246 patients and an operative group of 244 patients. We compared lactate, SI and BD independently and within panels to ascertain which would best predict the need for operative intervention in these patients. Abnormal was defined as lactate ≥ 4 mmol/l, SI ≥ 0.8 and BD ≤ -4 mmol/l.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 490 patients, lactate (<i>p</i> < 0.001), SI (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and BD (<i>p</i> < 0.001) differed significantly between operative and non-operative groups. Statistical significance was lost (<i>p</i> = 0.34) once BD was analysed in combination with lactate and SI. Lactate alone was a strong predictor of the need for intervention (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.814). The strongest predictor was a combined panel of lactate and SI (AUC = 0.8308, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lactate and SI in combination are useful as triage tools, and could assist in decision making, by predicting which patients are more likely to require surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":"62 1","pages":"23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biochemical markers in emergency thoracic surgery in penetrating trauma.\",\"authors\":\"M Lubout, J Goosen, D Kruger, P Fru, S Makhadi, M S Moeng\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Violent interpersonal acts account for a large proportion of unnatural deaths in South Africa. A significant proportion of unnatural deaths are due to penetrating thoracic trauma and preventable haemorrhage. Current indications for emergent thoracotomy are unreliable. We propose the use of lactate, shock index (SI) and base deficit (BD) as a triage tool in patients with penetrating thoracic injuries to identify those requiring surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of the trauma registry of the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) was carried out between March 2011 and March 2016. Four hundred and ninety (490) patients were collected consisting of a non-operative group of 246 patients and an operative group of 244 patients. We compared lactate, SI and BD independently and within panels to ascertain which would best predict the need for operative intervention in these patients. Abnormal was defined as lactate ≥ 4 mmol/l, SI ≥ 0.8 and BD ≤ -4 mmol/l.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 490 patients, lactate (<i>p</i> < 0.001), SI (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and BD (<i>p</i> < 0.001) differed significantly between operative and non-operative groups. Statistical significance was lost (<i>p</i> = 0.34) once BD was analysed in combination with lactate and SI. Lactate alone was a strong predictor of the need for intervention (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.814). The strongest predictor was a combined panel of lactate and SI (AUC = 0.8308, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lactate and SI in combination are useful as triage tools, and could assist in decision making, by predicting which patients are more likely to require surgical intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"23-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在南非,人际暴力行为占非正常死亡的很大比例。很大一部分非正常死亡是由于穿透性胸部创伤和可预防的大出血造成的。目前紧急开胸手术的适应症并不可靠。我们建议使用乳酸、休克指数(SI)和基础缺损(BD)作为穿透性胸部创伤患者的分诊工具,以识别需要手术干预的患者:2011年3月至2016年3月期间,对夏洛特-麦克斯克约翰内斯堡学术医院(CMJAH)的创伤登记进行了审查。共收集了 490 (490) 名患者,其中非手术组 246 名,手术组 244 名。我们对乳酸、SI 和 BD 进行了独立比较,并在小组内进行了比较,以确定哪种方法最能预测这些患者是否需要手术干预。乳酸≥4毫摩尔/升、SI≥0.8和BD≤-4毫摩尔/升即为异常:在 490 名患者中,手术组和非手术组的乳酸(p < 0.001)、SI(p < 0.001)和 BD(p < 0.001)差异显著。一旦将 BD 与乳酸盐和 SI 结合起来分析,统计意义就不复存在(p = 0.34)。仅乳酸就能有力地预测是否需要干预(曲线下面积 (AUC) = 0.814)。结论:乳酸和 SI 的组合是最强的预测指标(AUC = 0.8308,p < 0.001):结论:乳酸和 SI 的组合可作为有用的分诊工具,通过预测哪些患者更有可能需要手术干预来协助决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biochemical markers in emergency thoracic surgery in penetrating trauma.

Background: Violent interpersonal acts account for a large proportion of unnatural deaths in South Africa. A significant proportion of unnatural deaths are due to penetrating thoracic trauma and preventable haemorrhage. Current indications for emergent thoracotomy are unreliable. We propose the use of lactate, shock index (SI) and base deficit (BD) as a triage tool in patients with penetrating thoracic injuries to identify those requiring surgical intervention.

Methods: A review of the trauma registry of the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) was carried out between March 2011 and March 2016. Four hundred and ninety (490) patients were collected consisting of a non-operative group of 246 patients and an operative group of 244 patients. We compared lactate, SI and BD independently and within panels to ascertain which would best predict the need for operative intervention in these patients. Abnormal was defined as lactate ≥ 4 mmol/l, SI ≥ 0.8 and BD ≤ -4 mmol/l.

Results: Of the 490 patients, lactate (p < 0.001), SI (p < 0.001) and BD (p < 0.001) differed significantly between operative and non-operative groups. Statistical significance was lost (p = 0.34) once BD was analysed in combination with lactate and SI. Lactate alone was a strong predictor of the need for intervention (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.814). The strongest predictor was a combined panel of lactate and SI (AUC = 0.8308, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Lactate and SI in combination are useful as triage tools, and could assist in decision making, by predicting which patients are more likely to require surgical intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信