论最小化和卷积滤波器:基因组分析的理论联系与应用》。

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of Computational Biology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1089/cmb.2024.0483
Yun William Yu
{"title":"论最小化和卷积滤波器:基因组分析的理论联系与应用》。","authors":"Yun William Yu","doi":"10.1089/cmb.2024.0483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\n <b>Minimizers and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are two quite distinct popular techniques that have both been employed to analyze categorical biological sequences. At face value, the methods seem entirely dissimilar. Minimizers use min-wise hashing on a rolling window to extract a single important k-mer feature per window. CNNs start with a wide array of randomly initialized convolutional filters, paired with a pooling operation, and then multiple additional neural layers to learn both the filters themselves and how they can be used to classify the sequence. In this study, our main result is a careful mathematical analysis of hash function properties showing that for sequences over a categorical alphabet, random Gaussian initialization of convolutional filters with max-pooling is equivalent to choosing a minimizer ordering such that selected k-mers are (in Hamming distance) far from the k-mers within the sequence but close to other minimizers. In empirical experiments, we find that this property manifests as decreased density in repetitive regions, both in simulation and on real human telomeres. We additionally train from scratch a CNN embedding of synthetic short-reads from the SARS-CoV-2 genome into 3D Euclidean space that locally recapitulates the linear sequence distance of the read origins, a modest step toward building a deep learning assembler, although it is at present too slow to be practical. In total, this article provides a partial explanation for the effectiveness of CNNs in categorical sequence analysis.<sup></sup></b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":15526,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Biology","volume":" ","pages":"381-395"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Minimizers and Convolutional Filters: Theoretical Connections and Applications to Genome Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yun William Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/cmb.2024.0483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>\\n <b>Minimizers and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are two quite distinct popular techniques that have both been employed to analyze categorical biological sequences. At face value, the methods seem entirely dissimilar. Minimizers use min-wise hashing on a rolling window to extract a single important k-mer feature per window. CNNs start with a wide array of randomly initialized convolutional filters, paired with a pooling operation, and then multiple additional neural layers to learn both the filters themselves and how they can be used to classify the sequence. In this study, our main result is a careful mathematical analysis of hash function properties showing that for sequences over a categorical alphabet, random Gaussian initialization of convolutional filters with max-pooling is equivalent to choosing a minimizer ordering such that selected k-mers are (in Hamming distance) far from the k-mers within the sequence but close to other minimizers. In empirical experiments, we find that this property manifests as decreased density in repetitive regions, both in simulation and on real human telomeres. We additionally train from scratch a CNN embedding of synthetic short-reads from the SARS-CoV-2 genome into 3D Euclidean space that locally recapitulates the linear sequence distance of the read origins, a modest step toward building a deep learning assembler, although it is at present too slow to be practical. In total, this article provides a partial explanation for the effectiveness of CNNs in categorical sequence analysis.<sup></sup></b>\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computational Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"381-395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computational Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2024.0483\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2024.0483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最小化器和卷积神经网络(CNN)是两种截然不同的流行技术,都被用于分析分类生物序列。从表面上看,这两种方法似乎完全不同。最小化器在滚动窗口上使用最小哈希算法,每个窗口提取一个重要的 k-mer 特征。而 CNN 从一系列随机初始化的卷积滤波器开始,配以池化操作,然后通过多个附加神经层来学习滤波器本身以及如何使用它们对序列进行分类。在这项研究中,我们的主要成果是对哈希函数特性进行了细致的数学分析,结果表明,对于分类字母表上的序列,卷积滤波器的随机高斯初始化与最大池化等同于选择最小化排序,从而使所选的 k-mers 与序列中的 k-mers 相距较远(以汉明距离计算),但与其他最小化排序相近。在经验实验中,我们发现无论是在模拟还是在真实的人类端粒上,这一特性都表现为重复区域的密度降低。此外,我们还从头开始训练将来自 SARS-CoV-2 基因组的合成短读数嵌入到三维欧几里得空间的 CNN 嵌入,这种嵌入能在局部再现读数起源的线性序列距离,这是向构建深度学习装配器迈出的微不足道的一步,尽管它目前的速度太慢而不实用。总之,本文为 CNN 在分类序列分析中的有效性提供了部分解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Minimizers and Convolutional Filters: Theoretical Connections and Applications to Genome Analysis.

Minimizers and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are two quite distinct popular techniques that have both been employed to analyze categorical biological sequences. At face value, the methods seem entirely dissimilar. Minimizers use min-wise hashing on a rolling window to extract a single important k-mer feature per window. CNNs start with a wide array of randomly initialized convolutional filters, paired with a pooling operation, and then multiple additional neural layers to learn both the filters themselves and how they can be used to classify the sequence. In this study, our main result is a careful mathematical analysis of hash function properties showing that for sequences over a categorical alphabet, random Gaussian initialization of convolutional filters with max-pooling is equivalent to choosing a minimizer ordering such that selected k-mers are (in Hamming distance) far from the k-mers within the sequence but close to other minimizers. In empirical experiments, we find that this property manifests as decreased density in repetitive regions, both in simulation and on real human telomeres. We additionally train from scratch a CNN embedding of synthetic short-reads from the SARS-CoV-2 genome into 3D Euclidean space that locally recapitulates the linear sequence distance of the read origins, a modest step toward building a deep learning assembler, although it is at present too slow to be practical. In total, this article provides a partial explanation for the effectiveness of CNNs in categorical sequence analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computational Biology
Journal of Computational Biology 生物-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Computational Biology is the leading peer-reviewed journal in computational biology and bioinformatics, publishing in-depth statistical, mathematical, and computational analysis of methods, as well as their practical impact. Available only online, this is an essential journal for scientists and students who want to keep abreast of developments in bioinformatics. Journal of Computational Biology coverage includes: -Genomics -Mathematical modeling and simulation -Distributed and parallel biological computing -Designing biological databases -Pattern matching and pattern detection -Linking disparate databases and data -New tools for computational biology -Relational and object-oriented database technology for bioinformatics -Biological expert system design and use -Reasoning by analogy, hypothesis formation, and testing by machine -Management of biological databases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信