共享移动服务:从残疾人的角度进行无障碍评估。

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术
European Transport Research Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-25 DOI:10.1186/s12544-022-00559-w
Anne Goralzik, Alexandra König, Laura Alčiauskaitė, Tally Hatzakis
{"title":"共享移动服务:从残疾人的角度进行无障碍评估。","authors":"Anne Goralzik, Alexandra König, Laura Alčiauskaitė, Tally Hatzakis","doi":"10.1186/s12544-022-00559-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shared on-demand mobility services emerge at a fast pace, changing the landscape of public transport. However, shared mobility services are largely designed without considering the access needs of people with disabilities, putting these passengers at risk of exclusion. Recognising that accessibility is best addressed at the design stage and through direct participation of persons with disabilities, the objective of this study was to explore disabled users' views on the following emerging shared mobility services: (a) ride pooling, (b) microtransit, (c) motorbike taxis, (d) robotaxis, (f) e-scooter sharing, and (g) bike sharing.</p><p><strong>Methodolgy: </strong>Using an online mobility survey, we sampled disabled users' (1) views on accessibility, (2) use intention, and (3) suggestions for improving accessibility. The results reflect the responses of 553 individuals with different types of disabilities from 21 European countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Projected accessibility and use intention were greatest for microtransit, robotaxis, and ride pooling across different disabilities. In contrast, motorbike taxis, e-scooter sharing, and bike sharing were viewed as least accessible and least attractive to use, especially by persons with physical, visual, and multiple disabilities. Despite differences in projected accessibility, none of the shared mobility services would fulfil the access needs of disabled persons in their current form. Suggestions for increasing the accessibility of these services included (a) an ondemand door-to-door service, (b) an accessible booking app, (c) real-time travel information, and (d) the necessity of accommodating wheelchairs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the need for improving both vehicles and service designs to cater for the access needs of persons with disabilities and provide policymakers with recommendations for the design of accessible mobility solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48671,"journal":{"name":"European Transport Research Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared mobility services: an accessibility assessment from the perspective of people with disabilities.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Goralzik, Alexandra König, Laura Alčiauskaitė, Tally Hatzakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12544-022-00559-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shared on-demand mobility services emerge at a fast pace, changing the landscape of public transport. However, shared mobility services are largely designed without considering the access needs of people with disabilities, putting these passengers at risk of exclusion. Recognising that accessibility is best addressed at the design stage and through direct participation of persons with disabilities, the objective of this study was to explore disabled users' views on the following emerging shared mobility services: (a) ride pooling, (b) microtransit, (c) motorbike taxis, (d) robotaxis, (f) e-scooter sharing, and (g) bike sharing.</p><p><strong>Methodolgy: </strong>Using an online mobility survey, we sampled disabled users' (1) views on accessibility, (2) use intention, and (3) suggestions for improving accessibility. The results reflect the responses of 553 individuals with different types of disabilities from 21 European countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Projected accessibility and use intention were greatest for microtransit, robotaxis, and ride pooling across different disabilities. In contrast, motorbike taxis, e-scooter sharing, and bike sharing were viewed as least accessible and least attractive to use, especially by persons with physical, visual, and multiple disabilities. Despite differences in projected accessibility, none of the shared mobility services would fulfil the access needs of disabled persons in their current form. Suggestions for increasing the accessibility of these services included (a) an ondemand door-to-door service, (b) an accessible booking app, (c) real-time travel information, and (d) the necessity of accommodating wheelchairs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the need for improving both vehicles and service designs to cater for the access needs of persons with disabilities and provide policymakers with recommendations for the design of accessible mobility solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Transport Research Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9309238/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Transport Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-022-00559-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Transport Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-022-00559-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言按需共享交通服务的出现速度很快,改变了公共交通的面貌。然而,共享交通服务在设计时大多没有考虑到残疾人的无障碍需求,使这些乘客面临被排斥的风险。考虑到无障碍问题最好在设计阶段并通过残疾人的直接参与来解决,本研究旨在探讨残疾人用户对以下新兴共享交通服务的看法:(a) 拼车、(b) 微型公交、(c) 摩托车出租车、(d) 机器人出租车、(f) 电动滑板车共享和(g) 自行车共享:通过在线移动调查,我们抽样调查了残疾人用户(1)对无障碍环境的看法、(2)使用意向和(3)对改善无障碍环境的建议。结果反映了来自 21 个欧洲国家的 553 名不同类型残疾人的回答:结果:在不同残疾类型中,微型公交、机器人出租车和拼车的预计无障碍程度和使用意向最高。相比之下,摩托车出租车、电动滑板车共享和自行车共享被认为最不方便使用,使用吸引力也最小,尤其是对肢体残疾、视力残疾和多重残疾人士而言。尽管在预计的无障碍程度上存在差异,但没有一项共享交通服务能以目前的形式满足残疾人的无障碍需求。提高这些服务无障碍程度的建议包括:(a)按需提供门到门服务;(b)无障碍预订应用程序;(c)实时出行信息;(d)为轮椅提供便利的必要性:我们的研究结果强调了改进车辆和服务设计以满足残疾人无障碍需求的必要性,并为政策制定者提供了设计无障碍交通解决方案的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shared mobility services: an accessibility assessment from the perspective of people with disabilities.

Introduction: Shared on-demand mobility services emerge at a fast pace, changing the landscape of public transport. However, shared mobility services are largely designed without considering the access needs of people with disabilities, putting these passengers at risk of exclusion. Recognising that accessibility is best addressed at the design stage and through direct participation of persons with disabilities, the objective of this study was to explore disabled users' views on the following emerging shared mobility services: (a) ride pooling, (b) microtransit, (c) motorbike taxis, (d) robotaxis, (f) e-scooter sharing, and (g) bike sharing.

Methodolgy: Using an online mobility survey, we sampled disabled users' (1) views on accessibility, (2) use intention, and (3) suggestions for improving accessibility. The results reflect the responses of 553 individuals with different types of disabilities from 21 European countries.

Results: Projected accessibility and use intention were greatest for microtransit, robotaxis, and ride pooling across different disabilities. In contrast, motorbike taxis, e-scooter sharing, and bike sharing were viewed as least accessible and least attractive to use, especially by persons with physical, visual, and multiple disabilities. Despite differences in projected accessibility, none of the shared mobility services would fulfil the access needs of disabled persons in their current form. Suggestions for increasing the accessibility of these services included (a) an ondemand door-to-door service, (b) an accessible booking app, (c) real-time travel information, and (d) the necessity of accommodating wheelchairs.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the need for improving both vehicles and service designs to cater for the access needs of persons with disabilities and provide policymakers with recommendations for the design of accessible mobility solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Transport Research Review
European Transport Research Review Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: European Transport Research Review (ETRR) is a peer-reviewed open access journal publishing original high-quality scholarly research and developments in areas related to transportation science, technologies, policy and practice. Established in 2008 by the European Conference of Transport Research Institutes (ECTRI), the Journal provides researchers and practitioners around the world with an authoritative forum for the dissemination and critical discussion of new ideas and methodologies that originate in, or are of special interest to, the European transport research community. The journal is unique in its field, as it covers all modes of transport and addresses both the engineering and the social science perspective, offering a truly multidisciplinary platform for researchers, practitioners, engineers and policymakers. ETRR is aimed at a readership including researchers, practitioners in the design and operation of transportation systems, and policymakers at the international, national, regional and local levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信