全国神经系统复杂慢性病患儿急诊护理特点。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kaileen Jafari, Kristen Carlin, Derya Caglar, Eileen J Klein, Tamara D Simon
{"title":"全国神经系统复杂慢性病患儿急诊护理特点。","authors":"Kaileen Jafari, Kristen Carlin, Derya Caglar, Eileen J Klein, Tamara D Simon","doi":"10.5811/westjem.17834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most pediatric emergency care occurs in general emergency departments (GED), where less pediatric experience and lower pediatric emergency readiness may compromise care. Medically vulnerable pediatric patients, such as those with chronic, severe, neurologic conditions, are likely to be disproportionately affected by suboptimal care in GEDs; however, little is known about characteristics of their care in either the general or pediatric emergency setting. In this study our objective was to compare the frequency, characteristics, and outcomes of ED visits made by children with chronic neurologic diseases between general and pediatric EDs (PED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2011-2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) for ED visits made by patients 0-21 years with neurologic complex chronic conditions (neuro CCC). We compared patient, hospital, and ED visits characteristics between GEDs and PEDs using descriptive statistics. We assessed outcomes of admission, transfer, critical procedure performance, and mortality using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 387,813 neuro CCC ED visits (0.3% of 0-21-year-old ED visits) in our sample. Care occurred predominantly in GEDs, and visits were associated with a high severity of illness (30.1% highest severity classification score). Compared to GED visits, PED neuro CCC visits were comprised of individuals who were younger, more likely to have comorbid conditions (32.9% vs 21%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and technology assistance (65.4% vs. 45.9%) but underwent fewer procedures and had lower ED charges ($2,200 vs $1,520, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Visits to PEDs had lower adjusted odds of critical procedures (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.87), transfers (aOR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.56), and mortality (aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.75) compared to GEDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Care for children with neuro CCCs in a pediatric ED is associated with less resource utilization and lower rates of transfer and mortality. Identifying features of PED care for neuro CCCs could lead to lower costs and mortality for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 2","pages":"237-245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Characteristics of Emergency Care for Children with Neurologic Complex Chronic Conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Kaileen Jafari, Kristen Carlin, Derya Caglar, Eileen J Klein, Tamara D Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.5811/westjem.17834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most pediatric emergency care occurs in general emergency departments (GED), where less pediatric experience and lower pediatric emergency readiness may compromise care. Medically vulnerable pediatric patients, such as those with chronic, severe, neurologic conditions, are likely to be disproportionately affected by suboptimal care in GEDs; however, little is known about characteristics of their care in either the general or pediatric emergency setting. In this study our objective was to compare the frequency, characteristics, and outcomes of ED visits made by children with chronic neurologic diseases between general and pediatric EDs (PED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2011-2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) for ED visits made by patients 0-21 years with neurologic complex chronic conditions (neuro CCC). We compared patient, hospital, and ED visits characteristics between GEDs and PEDs using descriptive statistics. We assessed outcomes of admission, transfer, critical procedure performance, and mortality using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 387,813 neuro CCC ED visits (0.3% of 0-21-year-old ED visits) in our sample. Care occurred predominantly in GEDs, and visits were associated with a high severity of illness (30.1% highest severity classification score). Compared to GED visits, PED neuro CCC visits were comprised of individuals who were younger, more likely to have comorbid conditions (32.9% vs 21%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and technology assistance (65.4% vs. 45.9%) but underwent fewer procedures and had lower ED charges ($2,200 vs $1,520, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Visits to PEDs had lower adjusted odds of critical procedures (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.87), transfers (aOR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.56), and mortality (aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.75) compared to GEDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Care for children with neuro CCCs in a pediatric ED is associated with less resource utilization and lower rates of transfer and mortality. Identifying features of PED care for neuro CCCs could lead to lower costs and mortality for this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"237-245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000559/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.17834\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.17834","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:大多数儿科急诊都是在普通急诊科(GED)进行的,而普通急诊科的儿科经验较少,儿科急诊的准备程度较低,可能会影响对患者的护理。在普通急诊室,儿科经验较少、儿科急救准备不足可能会影响急救效果。儿科病人(如患有慢性、严重神经系统疾病的病人)在医疗上很容易受到普通急诊室不完善的护理服务的严重影响;然而,人们对他们在普通急诊室或儿科急诊室接受护理的特点却知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们的目标是比较患有慢性神经系统疾病的儿童在普通急诊室和儿科急诊室就诊的频率、特点和结果:我们对 2011-2014 年全国急诊科样本(NEDS)中 0-21 岁神经系统复杂慢性疾病(神经 CCC)患者的急诊就诊情况进行了回顾性分析。我们使用描述性统计方法比较了 GED 和 PED 的患者、医院和急诊就诊特征。我们使用多变量逻辑回归法评估了入院、转院、关键程序表现和死亡率等结果:我们的样本中有 387,813 例神经性 CCC ED 就诊(占 0-21 岁 ED 就诊人数的 0.3%)。主要是在普通急诊室就诊,就诊者的病情严重程度较高(30.1%为最高严重程度分类得分)。与普通急诊室就诊者相比,PED 神经 CCC 就诊者更年轻,更有可能患有并发症(32.9% 对 21%,P P 结论:在儿科急诊室护理患有神经 CCC 的儿童可减少资源使用,降低转院率和死亡率。确定儿科急诊室护理神经性 CCC 的特点可降低这一人群的费用和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National Characteristics of Emergency Care for Children with Neurologic Complex Chronic Conditions.

Introduction: Most pediatric emergency care occurs in general emergency departments (GED), where less pediatric experience and lower pediatric emergency readiness may compromise care. Medically vulnerable pediatric patients, such as those with chronic, severe, neurologic conditions, are likely to be disproportionately affected by suboptimal care in GEDs; however, little is known about characteristics of their care in either the general or pediatric emergency setting. In this study our objective was to compare the frequency, characteristics, and outcomes of ED visits made by children with chronic neurologic diseases between general and pediatric EDs (PED).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2011-2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) for ED visits made by patients 0-21 years with neurologic complex chronic conditions (neuro CCC). We compared patient, hospital, and ED visits characteristics between GEDs and PEDs using descriptive statistics. We assessed outcomes of admission, transfer, critical procedure performance, and mortality using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: There were 387,813 neuro CCC ED visits (0.3% of 0-21-year-old ED visits) in our sample. Care occurred predominantly in GEDs, and visits were associated with a high severity of illness (30.1% highest severity classification score). Compared to GED visits, PED neuro CCC visits were comprised of individuals who were younger, more likely to have comorbid conditions (32.9% vs 21%, P < 0.001), and technology assistance (65.4% vs. 45.9%) but underwent fewer procedures and had lower ED charges ($2,200 vs $1,520, P < 0.001). Visits to PEDs had lower adjusted odds of critical procedures (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.87), transfers (aOR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.56), and mortality (aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.75) compared to GEDs.

Conclusion: Care for children with neuro CCCs in a pediatric ED is associated with less resource utilization and lower rates of transfer and mortality. Identifying features of PED care for neuro CCCs could lead to lower costs and mortality for this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信