Sneh Lata Verma, Tripti Tikku, Rohit Khanna, Kamna Srivastava, Rana Pratap Maurya, Priyanka Rai
{"title":"不同生长模式受试者的下颌第三磨牙方向和可用后磨牙间隙与牙弓长度差异的相关性。","authors":"Sneh Lata Verma, Tripti Tikku, Rohit Khanna, Kamna Srivastava, Rana Pratap Maurya, Priyanka Rai","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_63_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and objective: </strong>To evaluate, compare, and correlate the mandibular third molar orientation and available retromolar space with arch length discrepancy in subjects with skeletal class II malocclusion and different growth pattern.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>A total of 250 patients (age >18 yrs) having skeletal class II malocclusion (based on YEN angle and WITS appraisal) were divided into two groups. Both the groups (Group I with erupted mandibular third molars {N = 150} and Group II with impacted mandibular third molars {N = 100}) were subdivided into subgroups IA (n = 71), IB (n = 19), IC (n = 71) and Group IIA (n = 54), IIB (n = 30) and IIC (n = 16) for normo-, hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns, respectively (based on Jarabak ratio and Sn-Go-Gn angle). Four parameters, that is, retromolar space, width of third molar, third molar angulation, and mandibular incisor angulation were measured on orthopantomogram whereas arch length discrepancy was calculated with the help of lateral cephalogram and study model. Intragroup, intergroup comparisons (using unpaired Student's 't' test), and Pearson's correlation coefficient for assessed parameters were obtained.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Third molar angulation and retromolar space were significantly higher in Group I than in Group II (hyperdivergent pattern of Group II had highest value). The width of third molar was less than retromolar space in Group II and vice versa for Group I. Mandibular incisor angulation and arch length discrepancy were more in Group II than in Group I, but difference was statistically nonsignificant. Strong positive correlation was observed for mandibular third molar angulation and available retromolar space in normo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lack of retromolar space along with increased amount of arch length discrepancy and mandibular incisor angulation is responsible for increased chances of third molar impaction in some subjects with class II malocclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":101444,"journal":{"name":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"106-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of mandibular third molar orientation and available retromolar space with arch length discrepancy in subjects with different growth pattern.\",\"authors\":\"Sneh Lata Verma, Tripti Tikku, Rohit Khanna, Kamna Srivastava, Rana Pratap Maurya, Priyanka Rai\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/njms.njms_63_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim and objective: </strong>To evaluate, compare, and correlate the mandibular third molar orientation and available retromolar space with arch length discrepancy in subjects with skeletal class II malocclusion and different growth pattern.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>A total of 250 patients (age >18 yrs) having skeletal class II malocclusion (based on YEN angle and WITS appraisal) were divided into two groups. Both the groups (Group I with erupted mandibular third molars {N = 150} and Group II with impacted mandibular third molars {N = 100}) were subdivided into subgroups IA (n = 71), IB (n = 19), IC (n = 71) and Group IIA (n = 54), IIB (n = 30) and IIC (n = 16) for normo-, hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns, respectively (based on Jarabak ratio and Sn-Go-Gn angle). Four parameters, that is, retromolar space, width of third molar, third molar angulation, and mandibular incisor angulation were measured on orthopantomogram whereas arch length discrepancy was calculated with the help of lateral cephalogram and study model. Intragroup, intergroup comparisons (using unpaired Student's 't' test), and Pearson's correlation coefficient for assessed parameters were obtained.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Third molar angulation and retromolar space were significantly higher in Group I than in Group II (hyperdivergent pattern of Group II had highest value). The width of third molar was less than retromolar space in Group II and vice versa for Group I. Mandibular incisor angulation and arch length discrepancy were more in Group II than in Group I, but difference was statistically nonsignificant. Strong positive correlation was observed for mandibular third molar angulation and available retromolar space in normo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lack of retromolar space along with increased amount of arch length discrepancy and mandibular incisor angulation is responsible for increased chances of third molar impaction in some subjects with class II malocclusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National journal of maxillofacial surgery\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"106-115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057591/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National journal of maxillofacial surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_63_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_63_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的和目标评估、比较下颌第三磨牙的方向和可利用的后磨牙间隙,并将其与骨骼Ⅱ类错颌畸形和不同生长模式的患者的牙弓长度差异相关联:将 250 名骨骼Ⅱ类错颌畸形(根据 YEN 角和 WITS 评估)患者(年龄大于 18 岁)分为两组。两组(Ⅰ组下颌第三磨牙萌出{N=150},Ⅱ组下颌第三磨牙阻生{N=100})又被细分为IA组(n=71)、IB组(n=19)、IC组(n=71)和IIA组(n=54)、IIB组(n=30)和IIC组(n=16),分别为正常、低和高分化生长模式(基于Jarabak比值和Sn-Go-Gn角)。在正侧位图上测量了四个参数,即后磨牙间隙、第三磨牙宽度、第三磨牙角度和下颌切牙角度,而牙弓长度差异则借助侧位头影和研究模型进行计算。对评估参数进行了组内、组间比较(使用非配对的学生 "t "检验)和皮尔逊相关系数:结果:第一组的第三磨牙角度和后磨牙间隙明显高于第二组(第二组的超发散模式值最高)。第二组第三磨牙的宽度小于后磨牙间隙,而第一组则相反。第二组的下颌切牙角度和牙弓长度差异大于第一组,但差异无统计学意义。下颌第三磨牙的角度与后槽牙的可用空间在正常生长模式和超发散生长模式中均呈强烈的正相关:结论:后磨牙间隙的缺乏以及牙弓长度差异和下颌切牙成角的增加是导致一些 II 类错颌畸形患者第三磨牙嵌合机会增加的原因。
Correlation of mandibular third molar orientation and available retromolar space with arch length discrepancy in subjects with different growth pattern.
Aim and objective: To evaluate, compare, and correlate the mandibular third molar orientation and available retromolar space with arch length discrepancy in subjects with skeletal class II malocclusion and different growth pattern.
Material and method: A total of 250 patients (age >18 yrs) having skeletal class II malocclusion (based on YEN angle and WITS appraisal) were divided into two groups. Both the groups (Group I with erupted mandibular third molars {N = 150} and Group II with impacted mandibular third molars {N = 100}) were subdivided into subgroups IA (n = 71), IB (n = 19), IC (n = 71) and Group IIA (n = 54), IIB (n = 30) and IIC (n = 16) for normo-, hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns, respectively (based on Jarabak ratio and Sn-Go-Gn angle). Four parameters, that is, retromolar space, width of third molar, third molar angulation, and mandibular incisor angulation were measured on orthopantomogram whereas arch length discrepancy was calculated with the help of lateral cephalogram and study model. Intragroup, intergroup comparisons (using unpaired Student's 't' test), and Pearson's correlation coefficient for assessed parameters were obtained.
Result: Third molar angulation and retromolar space were significantly higher in Group I than in Group II (hyperdivergent pattern of Group II had highest value). The width of third molar was less than retromolar space in Group II and vice versa for Group I. Mandibular incisor angulation and arch length discrepancy were more in Group II than in Group I, but difference was statistically nonsignificant. Strong positive correlation was observed for mandibular third molar angulation and available retromolar space in normo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns.
Conclusion: Lack of retromolar space along with increased amount of arch length discrepancy and mandibular incisor angulation is responsible for increased chances of third molar impaction in some subjects with class II malocclusion.