让儿科医生 "EASI "地判断幼儿发脾气何时 "超过了可怕的两岁":使用多维评估档案--易激惹早期评估筛查器(MAPS-EASI)进行初级保健筛查的概念验证。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Lauren S Wakschlag, Allison J Carroll, Susan Friedland, John Walkup, Jillian L Wiggins, Nivedita Mohanty, Ellen Papacek, Sacha Bridi, Ryan Carroll, David Drelicharz, Zeba Hasan, Tara Kotagal, Matthew M Davis, Justin D Smith
{"title":"让儿科医生 \"EASI \"地判断幼儿发脾气何时 \"超过了可怕的两岁\":使用多维评估档案--易激惹早期评估筛查器(MAPS-EASI)进行初级保健筛查的概念验证。","authors":"Lauren S Wakschlag, Allison J Carroll, Susan Friedland, John Walkup, Jillian L Wiggins, Nivedita Mohanty, Ellen Papacek, Sacha Bridi, Ryan Carroll, David Drelicharz, Zeba Hasan, Tara Kotagal, Matthew M Davis, Justin D Smith","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Up to 20% of youth have impairing mental health problems as early as age 3. Early identification and intervention of mental health risks in pediatric primary care could mitigate this crisis via prevention prior to disease onset. The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a brief transdiagnostic screening instrument in pediatric primary care for irritability and corollary impairment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five pediatric clinicians in a Midwest clinic implemented the Multidimensional Assessment Profiles-Early Assessment Screener of Irritability (MAPS-EASI) for toddlers (24-30 months) and their families. MAPS-EASI (psychometrically derived from the well-validated MAPS-Scales) includes six items (scored 0-5) about symptoms (e.g., tantrums, grumpy mood), context, and frequency and two items (scored 0-3) assessed impairment. Positive screens (MAPS-EASI ≥ 5 plus impairment ≥ 2) were referred to an evidence-based parenting intervention. We assessed reach and outcomes of MAPS-EASI screening. Follow-up interviews with clinicians assessed perspectives on irritability screening and MAPS-EASI implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 201 eligible families, 100 (49.8%) completed the screener for a 24- or 30-month well-child visit. Mean MAPS-EASI scores were 5.8 (SD = 3.2), mean impairment scores were 0.9 (SD = 0.9), and 24 (24.0%) screened positive. Clinicians indicated that irritability screening for toddlers was aligned with their prevention-oriented, developmentally based practice. MAPS-EASI had face validity and increased clinician decision-making confidence. Finally, clinicians identified barriers and facilitators to large-scale implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAPS-EASI proved to be feasible and acceptable in pediatric primary care. Further tailoring will be needed as the MAPS-EASI processes are scaled out to new contexts and populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":"42 1","pages":"34-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making it \\\"EASI\\\" for pediatricians to determine when toddler tantrums are \\\"more than the terrible twos\\\": Proof-of-concept for primary care screening with the Multidimensional Assessment Profiles-Early Assessment Screener for Irritability (MAPS-EASI).\",\"authors\":\"Lauren S Wakschlag, Allison J Carroll, Susan Friedland, John Walkup, Jillian L Wiggins, Nivedita Mohanty, Ellen Papacek, Sacha Bridi, Ryan Carroll, David Drelicharz, Zeba Hasan, Tara Kotagal, Matthew M Davis, Justin D Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fsh0000868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Up to 20% of youth have impairing mental health problems as early as age 3. Early identification and intervention of mental health risks in pediatric primary care could mitigate this crisis via prevention prior to disease onset. The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a brief transdiagnostic screening instrument in pediatric primary care for irritability and corollary impairment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five pediatric clinicians in a Midwest clinic implemented the Multidimensional Assessment Profiles-Early Assessment Screener of Irritability (MAPS-EASI) for toddlers (24-30 months) and their families. MAPS-EASI (psychometrically derived from the well-validated MAPS-Scales) includes six items (scored 0-5) about symptoms (e.g., tantrums, grumpy mood), context, and frequency and two items (scored 0-3) assessed impairment. Positive screens (MAPS-EASI ≥ 5 plus impairment ≥ 2) were referred to an evidence-based parenting intervention. We assessed reach and outcomes of MAPS-EASI screening. Follow-up interviews with clinicians assessed perspectives on irritability screening and MAPS-EASI implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 201 eligible families, 100 (49.8%) completed the screener for a 24- or 30-month well-child visit. Mean MAPS-EASI scores were 5.8 (SD = 3.2), mean impairment scores were 0.9 (SD = 0.9), and 24 (24.0%) screened positive. Clinicians indicated that irritability screening for toddlers was aligned with their prevention-oriented, developmentally based practice. MAPS-EASI had face validity and increased clinician decision-making confidence. Finally, clinicians identified barriers and facilitators to large-scale implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAPS-EASI proved to be feasible and acceptable in pediatric primary care. Further tailoring will be needed as the MAPS-EASI processes are scaled out to new contexts and populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"34-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000868\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000868","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多达 20% 的青少年早在 3 岁时就存在有损心理健康的问题。在儿科初级保健中对心理健康风险进行早期识别和干预,可在疾病发生前进行预防,从而缓解这一危机。本研究的目的是确定在儿科初级保健中实施简短的跨诊断筛查工具以检测易激惹性和相关损害的可行性和可接受性:方法:美国中西部一家诊所的五名儿科临床医生为幼儿(24-30 个月)及其家人实施了多维评估档案--易激惹早期评估筛查工具(MAPS-EASI)。MAPS-EASI(在心理计量学上源于已获广泛认可的 MAPS-量表)包括六个有关症状(如发脾气、暴躁情绪)、背景和频率的项目(评分 0-5),以及两个评估损伤的项目(评分 0-3)。阳性筛查结果(MAPS-EASI ≥ 5 加损伤 ≥ 2)将被转至循证育儿干预。我们评估了 MAPS-EASI 筛查的覆盖范围和结果。与临床医生进行的后续访谈评估了对易怒筛查和 MAPS-EASI 实施的看法:在 201 个符合条件的家庭中,有 100 个家庭(49.8%)在 24 个月或 30 个月的儿童健康检查中完成了筛查。MAPS-EASI 平均得分为 5.8(标准差 = 3.2),平均损伤得分为 0.9(标准差 = 0.9),24 人(24.0%)筛查结果呈阳性。临床医生表示,幼儿易激惹筛查符合他们以预防为导向、以发展为基础的实践。MAPS-EASI具有表面效度,增强了临床医生决策的信心。最后,临床医生指出了大规模实施的障碍和促进因素:结论:事实证明,MAPS-EASI 在儿科初级保健中是可行且可接受的。随着 MAPS-EASI 程序在新环境和人群中的推广,还需要进一步调整。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making it "EASI" for pediatricians to determine when toddler tantrums are "more than the terrible twos": Proof-of-concept for primary care screening with the Multidimensional Assessment Profiles-Early Assessment Screener for Irritability (MAPS-EASI).

Background: Up to 20% of youth have impairing mental health problems as early as age 3. Early identification and intervention of mental health risks in pediatric primary care could mitigate this crisis via prevention prior to disease onset. The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a brief transdiagnostic screening instrument in pediatric primary care for irritability and corollary impairment.

Method: Five pediatric clinicians in a Midwest clinic implemented the Multidimensional Assessment Profiles-Early Assessment Screener of Irritability (MAPS-EASI) for toddlers (24-30 months) and their families. MAPS-EASI (psychometrically derived from the well-validated MAPS-Scales) includes six items (scored 0-5) about symptoms (e.g., tantrums, grumpy mood), context, and frequency and two items (scored 0-3) assessed impairment. Positive screens (MAPS-EASI ≥ 5 plus impairment ≥ 2) were referred to an evidence-based parenting intervention. We assessed reach and outcomes of MAPS-EASI screening. Follow-up interviews with clinicians assessed perspectives on irritability screening and MAPS-EASI implementation.

Results: Of 201 eligible families, 100 (49.8%) completed the screener for a 24- or 30-month well-child visit. Mean MAPS-EASI scores were 5.8 (SD = 3.2), mean impairment scores were 0.9 (SD = 0.9), and 24 (24.0%) screened positive. Clinicians indicated that irritability screening for toddlers was aligned with their prevention-oriented, developmentally based practice. MAPS-EASI had face validity and increased clinician decision-making confidence. Finally, clinicians identified barriers and facilitators to large-scale implementation.

Conclusions: MAPS-EASI proved to be feasible and acceptable in pediatric primary care. Further tailoring will be needed as the MAPS-EASI processes are scaled out to new contexts and populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信