专业发展研讨会:应用种族与文化指南减少医学教学案例中的偏见。

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2024-03-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2024.463730
Ryan Vagedes, Berkeley Franz, Anna Kerr, Frances Wymbs, Chynna Smith, Alicia Rodgers, Samantha Nandyal, David Strawhun, Katy Kropf, Sharon Casapulla
{"title":"专业发展研讨会:应用种族与文化指南减少医学教学案例中的偏见。","authors":"Ryan Vagedes, Berkeley Franz, Anna Kerr, Frances Wymbs, Chynna Smith, Alicia Rodgers, Samantha Nandyal, David Strawhun, Katy Kropf, Sharon Casapulla","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2024.463730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical teaching cases are a cornerstone of health professions education programs, but cases historically have lacked diversity and have the potential to reinforce essentialism. In this article, we describe the creation, implementation, and feasibility assessment of a professional development workshop aimed at integrating an existing bias reduction tool into discussion and revision of teaching cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six 60-minute workshops were held introducing \"The Race and Culture Guide for Editors of Teaching Cases\" to different health profession education programs wherein all participants worked in small groups to critique and edit two sample teaching cases. To assess initial feasibility, facilitators completed a facilitator evaluation survey to capture experiences after the first three workshops. Due to positive feedback, workshops were continued, and participants completed a participant evaluation survey to understand learner impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Facilitators (n=6) identified the workshop as addressing an important need, highlighted the value in small-group format, and noted their ability to facilitate future sessions. Participants (n=18) rated the workshop as useful, effective at challenging biases, and would recommend the workshop to others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The purpose of this study was to understand the feasibility of implementing a discussion-based workshop integrating a bias reduction tool. Initial feasibility and acceptability assessments demonstrate that this workshop.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"8 ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11051698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Professional Development Workshop: Applying the Race and Culture Guide to Reduce Bias in Medical Teaching Cases.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Vagedes, Berkeley Franz, Anna Kerr, Frances Wymbs, Chynna Smith, Alicia Rodgers, Samantha Nandyal, David Strawhun, Katy Kropf, Sharon Casapulla\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/PRiMER.2024.463730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical teaching cases are a cornerstone of health professions education programs, but cases historically have lacked diversity and have the potential to reinforce essentialism. In this article, we describe the creation, implementation, and feasibility assessment of a professional development workshop aimed at integrating an existing bias reduction tool into discussion and revision of teaching cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six 60-minute workshops were held introducing \\\"The Race and Culture Guide for Editors of Teaching Cases\\\" to different health profession education programs wherein all participants worked in small groups to critique and edit two sample teaching cases. To assess initial feasibility, facilitators completed a facilitator evaluation survey to capture experiences after the first three workshops. Due to positive feedback, workshops were continued, and participants completed a participant evaluation survey to understand learner impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Facilitators (n=6) identified the workshop as addressing an important need, highlighted the value in small-group format, and noted their ability to facilitate future sessions. Participants (n=18) rated the workshop as useful, effective at challenging biases, and would recommend the workshop to others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The purpose of this study was to understand the feasibility of implementing a discussion-based workshop integrating a bias reduction tool. Initial feasibility and acceptability assessments demonstrate that this workshop.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11051698/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2024.463730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2024.463730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:临床教学案例是健康专业教育项目的基石,但案例历来缺乏多样性,并有可能强化本质主义。在这篇文章中,我们介绍了一个专业发展研讨会的创建、实施和可行性评估,该研讨会旨在将现有的减少偏见工具整合到教学病例的讨论和修订中:方法:举办了六场 60 分钟的研讨会,向不同的卫生专业教育项目介绍《教学案例编辑种族与文化指南》,所有参与者以小组为单位对两个教学案例样本进行点评和编辑。为了评估最初的可行性,主持人填写了一份主持人评估调查表,以记录前三次研讨会后的经验。由于反馈积极,研讨会得以继续,参与者完成了参与者评估调查,以了解对学习者的影响:促进者(6 人)认为研讨会满足了他们的重要需求,强调了小组形式的价值,并指出他们有能力促进今后的研讨会。学员(人数=18)认为研讨会有用,能有效挑战偏见,并愿意向他人推荐研讨会:本研究的目的是了解实施整合了减少偏见工具的讨论式研讨会的可行性。初步的可行性和可接受性评估表明,该工作坊
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Professional Development Workshop: Applying the Race and Culture Guide to Reduce Bias in Medical Teaching Cases.

Introduction: Clinical teaching cases are a cornerstone of health professions education programs, but cases historically have lacked diversity and have the potential to reinforce essentialism. In this article, we describe the creation, implementation, and feasibility assessment of a professional development workshop aimed at integrating an existing bias reduction tool into discussion and revision of teaching cases.

Methods: Six 60-minute workshops were held introducing "The Race and Culture Guide for Editors of Teaching Cases" to different health profession education programs wherein all participants worked in small groups to critique and edit two sample teaching cases. To assess initial feasibility, facilitators completed a facilitator evaluation survey to capture experiences after the first three workshops. Due to positive feedback, workshops were continued, and participants completed a participant evaluation survey to understand learner impact.

Results: Facilitators (n=6) identified the workshop as addressing an important need, highlighted the value in small-group format, and noted their ability to facilitate future sessions. Participants (n=18) rated the workshop as useful, effective at challenging biases, and would recommend the workshop to others.

Conclusion: The purpose of this study was to understand the feasibility of implementing a discussion-based workshop integrating a bias reduction tool. Initial feasibility and acceptability assessments demonstrate that this workshop.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信