左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后谵妄的预后影响:一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Paul Noufi, Kelley M Anderson, Nancy Crowell, Yasmine White, Ezequiel Molina, Sriram D Rao, Hunter Groninger
{"title":"左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后谵妄的预后影响:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Paul Noufi, Kelley M Anderson, Nancy Crowell, Yasmine White, Ezequiel Molina, Sriram D Rao, Hunter Groninger","doi":"10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In critically ill patients, delirium is a prognostic indicator of morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the impact of a delirium diagnosis on outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all adult patients who received LVADs at our institution between January 2016 and December 2020. We compared preimplantation characteristics between the two groups, with and without a diagnosis of delirium, and compared their outcomes, including 1-month, 6-month, and in-hospital mortality, as well as reintubation rate, length of stay, discharge disposition, and readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 361 patients (26.7% women and 75.8% African American) received durable LVADs. Ninety-four patients (26.1%) were diagnosed with delirium during the index admission. Preimplantation demographic characteristics, past medical and psychiatric conditions, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Profile, and laboratory values did not differ between the two groups with and without a diagnosis of delirium; older age (59 vs 56; P = 0.03) was associated with delirium. Delirium diagnosis was associated with higher 1-month (P = 0.007), 6-month (P = 0.004), and in-hospital mortality (P < 0.001), unplanned reintubations (P < 0.001), and a lower likelihood of discharge home (P = 0.03). Total hospital and intensive care unit length of stay were higher in patients with a diagnosis of delirium, though these results were not statistically significant. Readmission to the hospital after index admission was quicker in patients with a diagnosis of delirium, but this result was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, a diagnosis of delirium during the LVAD implantation admission was associated with higher mortality, adverse postsurgical outcomes, and unfavorable discharge dispositions. Future prospective research is needed to validate the prognostic implications of delirium in both the short and long term. Additionally, there is a need to identify modifiable risk factors associated with delirium to promote early diagnosis and implement evidence-based management strategies to enhance outcomes within this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":52388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Implications of Delirium After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Noufi, Kelley M Anderson, Nancy Crowell, Yasmine White, Ezequiel Molina, Sriram D Rao, Hunter Groninger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.04.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In critically ill patients, delirium is a prognostic indicator of morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the impact of a delirium diagnosis on outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all adult patients who received LVADs at our institution between January 2016 and December 2020. We compared preimplantation characteristics between the two groups, with and without a diagnosis of delirium, and compared their outcomes, including 1-month, 6-month, and in-hospital mortality, as well as reintubation rate, length of stay, discharge disposition, and readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 361 patients (26.7% women and 75.8% African American) received durable LVADs. Ninety-four patients (26.1%) were diagnosed with delirium during the index admission. Preimplantation demographic characteristics, past medical and psychiatric conditions, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Profile, and laboratory values did not differ between the two groups with and without a diagnosis of delirium; older age (59 vs 56; P = 0.03) was associated with delirium. Delirium diagnosis was associated with higher 1-month (P = 0.007), 6-month (P = 0.004), and in-hospital mortality (P < 0.001), unplanned reintubations (P < 0.001), and a lower likelihood of discharge home (P = 0.03). Total hospital and intensive care unit length of stay were higher in patients with a diagnosis of delirium, though these results were not statistically significant. Readmission to the hospital after index admission was quicker in patients with a diagnosis of delirium, but this result was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, a diagnosis of delirium during the LVAD implantation admission was associated with higher mortality, adverse postsurgical outcomes, and unfavorable discharge dispositions. Future prospective research is needed to validate the prognostic implications of delirium in both the short and long term. Additionally, there is a need to identify modifiable risk factors associated with delirium to promote early diagnosis and implement evidence-based management strategies to enhance outcomes within this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.04.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.04.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:谵妄是危重病人发病率和死亡率的预后指标。本研究探讨了谵妄诊断对左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后预后的影响:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在我院接受 LVAD 的所有成年患者。我们比较了有谵妄诊断和无谵妄诊断两组患者的植入前特征,并比较了他们的预后,包括1个月、6个月和院内死亡率,以及再插管率、住院时间(LOS)、出院处置和再入院率:共有 361 名患者(26.7% 为女性,75.8% 为非裔美国人)接受了耐用型 LVAD。94名患者(26.1%)在入院时被诊断为谵妄。植入前的人口统计学特征、既往医疗和精神状况、机械辅助循环支持机构间登记(INTERMACS)档案以及实验室值在诊断出谵妄和未诊断出谵妄的两组患者之间没有差异;年龄较大(59 岁对 56 岁;P=0.03)与谵妄有关。谵妄诊断与较高的1个月死亡率(P=0.007)、6个月死亡率(P=0.004)和院内死亡率有关(结论:谵妄诊断与较高的1个月死亡率(P=0.007)、6个月死亡率(P=0.004)和院内死亡率有关):在这项研究中,在 LVAD 植入术入院期间诊断出谵妄与较高的死亡率、不良的术后结果和不利的出院处置有关。未来需要进行前瞻性研究,以验证谵妄对短期和长期预后的影响。此外,还需要确定与谵妄相关的可改变的风险因素,以促进早期诊断并实施循证管理策略,从而改善该人群的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Implications of Delirium After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Retrospective Study.

Background: In critically ill patients, delirium is a prognostic indicator of morbidity and mortality.

Objective: This study investigates the impact of a delirium diagnosis on outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

Methods: This retrospective study included all adult patients who received LVADs at our institution between January 2016 and December 2020. We compared preimplantation characteristics between the two groups, with and without a diagnosis of delirium, and compared their outcomes, including 1-month, 6-month, and in-hospital mortality, as well as reintubation rate, length of stay, discharge disposition, and readmission rates.

Results: In total, 361 patients (26.7% women and 75.8% African American) received durable LVADs. Ninety-four patients (26.1%) were diagnosed with delirium during the index admission. Preimplantation demographic characteristics, past medical and psychiatric conditions, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Profile, and laboratory values did not differ between the two groups with and without a diagnosis of delirium; older age (59 vs 56; P = 0.03) was associated with delirium. Delirium diagnosis was associated with higher 1-month (P = 0.007), 6-month (P = 0.004), and in-hospital mortality (P < 0.001), unplanned reintubations (P < 0.001), and a lower likelihood of discharge home (P = 0.03). Total hospital and intensive care unit length of stay were higher in patients with a diagnosis of delirium, though these results were not statistically significant. Readmission to the hospital after index admission was quicker in patients with a diagnosis of delirium, but this result was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: In this study, a diagnosis of delirium during the LVAD implantation admission was associated with higher mortality, adverse postsurgical outcomes, and unfavorable discharge dispositions. Future prospective research is needed to validate the prognostic implications of delirium in both the short and long term. Additionally, there is a need to identify modifiable risk factors associated with delirium to promote early diagnosis and implement evidence-based management strategies to enhance outcomes within this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信