巨型病毒全球蛋白质组学创新:凝胶内消化法和溶液内消化法的比较评估。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1089/omi.2024.0012
Monica Upadhyay, Divya Nair, Gregory W Moseley, Sanjeeva Srivastava, Kiran Kondabagil
{"title":"巨型病毒全球蛋白质组学创新:凝胶内消化法和溶液内消化法的比较评估。","authors":"Monica Upadhyay, Divya Nair, Gregory W Moseley, Sanjeeva Srivastava, Kiran Kondabagil","doi":"10.1089/omi.2024.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With their unusually large genome and particle sizes, giant viruses (GVs) defy the conventional definition of viruses. Although most GVs isolated infect unicellular protozoans, such as amoeba, studies in the last decade have established their much wider prevalence infecting most eukaryotic supergroups and some giant viral families with the potential to be human pathogens. Their complexity, almost autonomous life cycle, and enigmatic evolution necessitate the study of GVs. The accurate assessment of GV proteome is a veritable challenge. We have compared the coverage of global protein identification using different methods for GVs isolated in Mumbai, Mimivirus Bombay (MVB), Powai Lake Megavirus (PLMV), and Kurlavirus (KV), along with two previously studied GVs, Acanthamoeba polyphaga Mimivirus (APMV) and Marseillevirus (MV). Our study shows that the simultaneous use of in-gel and in-solution digestion methods can significantly increase the coverage of protein identification in the global proteome analysis of purified GV particles. Combining the two methods of analyses, we identified an additional 72 proteins in APMV and 114 in MV compared with what have been previously reported. Similarly, proteomes of MVB, PLMV, and KV were analyzed, and a total of 242 proteins in MVB, 287 proteins in PLMV, and 174 proteins in KV were identified. Our results suggest that a combined methodology of in-gel and in-solution methods is more efficient and opens up new avenues for innovation in global proteome analysis of GVs. Future planetary health research on GVs can benefit from consideration of a broader range of proteomics methodologies as illustrated by the present study.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Giant Virus Global Proteomics Innovation: Comparative Evaluation of In-Gel and In-Solution Digestion Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Monica Upadhyay, Divya Nair, Gregory W Moseley, Sanjeeva Srivastava, Kiran Kondabagil\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/omi.2024.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With their unusually large genome and particle sizes, giant viruses (GVs) defy the conventional definition of viruses. Although most GVs isolated infect unicellular protozoans, such as amoeba, studies in the last decade have established their much wider prevalence infecting most eukaryotic supergroups and some giant viral families with the potential to be human pathogens. Their complexity, almost autonomous life cycle, and enigmatic evolution necessitate the study of GVs. The accurate assessment of GV proteome is a veritable challenge. We have compared the coverage of global protein identification using different methods for GVs isolated in Mumbai, Mimivirus Bombay (MVB), Powai Lake Megavirus (PLMV), and Kurlavirus (KV), along with two previously studied GVs, Acanthamoeba polyphaga Mimivirus (APMV) and Marseillevirus (MV). Our study shows that the simultaneous use of in-gel and in-solution digestion methods can significantly increase the coverage of protein identification in the global proteome analysis of purified GV particles. Combining the two methods of analyses, we identified an additional 72 proteins in APMV and 114 in MV compared with what have been previously reported. Similarly, proteomes of MVB, PLMV, and KV were analyzed, and a total of 242 proteins in MVB, 287 proteins in PLMV, and 174 proteins in KV were identified. Our results suggest that a combined methodology of in-gel and in-solution methods is more efficient and opens up new avenues for innovation in global proteome analysis of GVs. Future planetary health research on GVs can benefit from consideration of a broader range of proteomics methodologies as illustrated by the present study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2024.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2024.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巨型病毒(GVs)的基因组和颗粒尺寸异常巨大,打破了病毒的传统定义。虽然大多数分离出来的巨型病毒感染单细胞原生动物,如变形虫,但过去十年的研究已经证实,它们广泛感染大多数真核超群和一些巨型病毒家族,并有可能成为人类病原体。巨细胞病毒的复杂性、几乎独立的生命周期和神秘的进化过程促使人们必须对其进行研究。准确评估巨细胞病毒蛋白质组是一项真正的挑战。我们比较了使用不同方法对孟买分离的 GV、孟买含羞草病毒(MVB)、Powai Lake Megavirus(PLMV)和 Kurlavirus(KV),以及之前研究过的两种 GV:Acanthamoeba polyphaga Mimivirus(APMV)和马赛病毒(MV)进行全球蛋白质鉴定的覆盖范围。我们的研究表明,在对纯化的 GV 颗粒进行全蛋白质组分析时,同时使用凝胶内消化法和溶液内消化法可以显著提高蛋白质鉴定的覆盖率。结合这两种分析方法,我们在 APMV 和 MV 中分别鉴定出了 72 个和 114 个蛋白质。同样,我们还分析了 MVB、PLMV 和 KV 的蛋白质组,共鉴定出 MVB 中的 242 个蛋白质、PLMV 中的 287 个蛋白质和 KV 中的 174 个蛋白质。我们的研究结果表明,凝胶内法和溶液内法相结合的方法更有效,为全球龙胆紫蛋白质组分析的创新开辟了新途径。如本研究所示,未来有关龙卷风的行星健康研究可受益于更广泛的蛋白质组学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Giant Virus Global Proteomics Innovation: Comparative Evaluation of In-Gel and In-Solution Digestion Methods.

With their unusually large genome and particle sizes, giant viruses (GVs) defy the conventional definition of viruses. Although most GVs isolated infect unicellular protozoans, such as amoeba, studies in the last decade have established their much wider prevalence infecting most eukaryotic supergroups and some giant viral families with the potential to be human pathogens. Their complexity, almost autonomous life cycle, and enigmatic evolution necessitate the study of GVs. The accurate assessment of GV proteome is a veritable challenge. We have compared the coverage of global protein identification using different methods for GVs isolated in Mumbai, Mimivirus Bombay (MVB), Powai Lake Megavirus (PLMV), and Kurlavirus (KV), along with two previously studied GVs, Acanthamoeba polyphaga Mimivirus (APMV) and Marseillevirus (MV). Our study shows that the simultaneous use of in-gel and in-solution digestion methods can significantly increase the coverage of protein identification in the global proteome analysis of purified GV particles. Combining the two methods of analyses, we identified an additional 72 proteins in APMV and 114 in MV compared with what have been previously reported. Similarly, proteomes of MVB, PLMV, and KV were analyzed, and a total of 242 proteins in MVB, 287 proteins in PLMV, and 174 proteins in KV were identified. Our results suggest that a combined methodology of in-gel and in-solution methods is more efficient and opens up new avenues for innovation in global proteome analysis of GVs. Future planetary health research on GVs can benefit from consideration of a broader range of proteomics methodologies as illustrated by the present study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信