Urethrotech 导尿装置在处理男性脊髓损伤患者尿道导尿困难方面的价值和局限性。

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2024-04-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S457784
Vaidyanathan Subramanian, Bakulesh Madhusudan Soni
{"title":"Urethrotech 导尿装置在处理男性脊髓损伤患者尿道导尿困难方面的价值和局限性。","authors":"Vaidyanathan Subramanian, Bakulesh Madhusudan Soni","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S457784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a Urethrotech catheterisation device in 57 male patients with spinal cord injury, in whom urethral catheterisation was unsuccessful or previous catheterisation was difficult.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Urethrotech catheter could be inserted in 51 patients. No patient developed urinary tract infection. In one patient, the guidewire could not be introduced into the bladder, and a coude Foley catheter was inserted. In two patients, the guidewire was inserted into the bladder, but a 16 CH catheter could not be advanced over the guidewire. Emergency suprapubic cystostomy was performed in one case; in the other, urethral stricture was dilated; a size 12 CH catheter was inserted. In three patients, the guidewire curled back into the urethra because of severe spasm of the urethral sphincter. Catheterisation with a Tiemann catheter was successful after administration of diazepam and/or stretching of the anal sphincter by another health professional, which caused reflex relaxation of the urethral sphincter. Complications of Urethrotech catheterisation included urethral bleeding, haematuria, pain, doubling back of the guidewire due to spasm of the urethral sphincter or from an empty bladder. We adopted variations in technique, eg filling the bladder with saline prior to catheterisation when feasible, insertion of the guidewire by the side of the old catheter, use of Tiemann tip catheters, administration of antibiotics, diazepam to control spasms, nifedipine to control autonomic dysreflexia, analgesics, stretching of the anal sphincter to induce reflex relaxation of the urethral sphincter, urgent imaging studies to confirm correct positioning of the catheter, omitting anticoagulants and monitoring patients, who developed bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of Urethrotech in spinal injury patients warranted adaptations to the technique, which required expertise, experience, and backup facilities. To ensure patient safety, Urethrotech catheter should be used in a hospital setting, and by medical personnel with experience in the management of spinal cord injury patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"143-150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value and Limitations of Urethrotech Catheterisation Device to Manage Difficult Urethral Catheterisation in Male Spinal Cord Injury Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Vaidyanathan Subramanian, Bakulesh Madhusudan Soni\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/MDER.S457784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a Urethrotech catheterisation device in 57 male patients with spinal cord injury, in whom urethral catheterisation was unsuccessful or previous catheterisation was difficult.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Urethrotech catheter could be inserted in 51 patients. No patient developed urinary tract infection. In one patient, the guidewire could not be introduced into the bladder, and a coude Foley catheter was inserted. In two patients, the guidewire was inserted into the bladder, but a 16 CH catheter could not be advanced over the guidewire. Emergency suprapubic cystostomy was performed in one case; in the other, urethral stricture was dilated; a size 12 CH catheter was inserted. In three patients, the guidewire curled back into the urethra because of severe spasm of the urethral sphincter. Catheterisation with a Tiemann catheter was successful after administration of diazepam and/or stretching of the anal sphincter by another health professional, which caused reflex relaxation of the urethral sphincter. Complications of Urethrotech catheterisation included urethral bleeding, haematuria, pain, doubling back of the guidewire due to spasm of the urethral sphincter or from an empty bladder. We adopted variations in technique, eg filling the bladder with saline prior to catheterisation when feasible, insertion of the guidewire by the side of the old catheter, use of Tiemann tip catheters, administration of antibiotics, diazepam to control spasms, nifedipine to control autonomic dysreflexia, analgesics, stretching of the anal sphincter to induce reflex relaxation of the urethral sphincter, urgent imaging studies to confirm correct positioning of the catheter, omitting anticoagulants and monitoring patients, who developed bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of Urethrotech in spinal injury patients warranted adaptations to the technique, which required expertise, experience, and backup facilities. To ensure patient safety, Urethrotech catheter should be used in a hospital setting, and by medical personnel with experience in the management of spinal cord injury patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"143-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032119/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S457784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S457784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法:我们在57名脊髓损伤的男性患者中使用了尿道导管插入装置,这些患者的尿道导管插入术不成功或之前的导管插入术很困难:结果:51 名患者可以插入尿道导管。没有患者发生尿路感染。在一名患者中,导丝无法导入膀胱,因此插入了耦合 Foley 导管。在两名患者中,导丝被插入膀胱,但 16 CH 导管无法在导丝上方推进。其中一名患者进行了耻骨上膀胱造口术;另一名患者扩张了尿道狭窄,插入了 12 号 CH 导管。在三名患者中,由于尿道括约肌严重痉挛,导丝又卷入了尿道。在使用地西泮和/或由另一名医护人员拉伸肛门括约肌,使尿道括约肌反射性放松后,使用蒂曼导尿管进行导尿获得成功。尿道导管插入术的并发症包括尿道出血、血尿、疼痛、尿道括约肌痉挛或膀胱空虚导致的导丝折返。我们采用了不同的技术,例如在可行的情况下在导管插入前用生理盐水注满膀胱、从旧导管的一侧插入导丝、使用蒂曼尖端导管、使用抗生素、地西泮来控制痉挛、使用硝苯地平控制自律神经反射障碍、止痛药、拉伸肛门括约肌以诱导尿道括约肌反射性松弛、进行紧急造影检查以确认导管的正确位置、不使用抗凝剂并对出现出血的患者进行监测。结论在脊柱损伤患者中使用尿道导管需要对技术进行调整,这需要专业知识、经验和备用设施。为确保患者安全,尿道导管应在医院环境中由具有脊髓损伤患者管理经验的医务人员使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Value and Limitations of Urethrotech Catheterisation Device to Manage Difficult Urethral Catheterisation in Male Spinal Cord Injury Patients.

Methods: We used a Urethrotech catheterisation device in 57 male patients with spinal cord injury, in whom urethral catheterisation was unsuccessful or previous catheterisation was difficult.

Results: Urethrotech catheter could be inserted in 51 patients. No patient developed urinary tract infection. In one patient, the guidewire could not be introduced into the bladder, and a coude Foley catheter was inserted. In two patients, the guidewire was inserted into the bladder, but a 16 CH catheter could not be advanced over the guidewire. Emergency suprapubic cystostomy was performed in one case; in the other, urethral stricture was dilated; a size 12 CH catheter was inserted. In three patients, the guidewire curled back into the urethra because of severe spasm of the urethral sphincter. Catheterisation with a Tiemann catheter was successful after administration of diazepam and/or stretching of the anal sphincter by another health professional, which caused reflex relaxation of the urethral sphincter. Complications of Urethrotech catheterisation included urethral bleeding, haematuria, pain, doubling back of the guidewire due to spasm of the urethral sphincter or from an empty bladder. We adopted variations in technique, eg filling the bladder with saline prior to catheterisation when feasible, insertion of the guidewire by the side of the old catheter, use of Tiemann tip catheters, administration of antibiotics, diazepam to control spasms, nifedipine to control autonomic dysreflexia, analgesics, stretching of the anal sphincter to induce reflex relaxation of the urethral sphincter, urgent imaging studies to confirm correct positioning of the catheter, omitting anticoagulants and monitoring patients, who developed bleeding.

Conclusion: Use of Urethrotech in spinal injury patients warranted adaptations to the technique, which required expertise, experience, and backup facilities. To ensure patient safety, Urethrotech catheter should be used in a hospital setting, and by medical personnel with experience in the management of spinal cord injury patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信