韩国医疗服务地区拥有 300 张或更多病床的急诊科对 30 天死亡率的影响:全国性回顾性横断面研究》。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stephen Gyung Won Lee, Haibin Bai, Joo Won Park, Seonhwa Lee, Mi Young Kwak, Won Mo Jang
{"title":"韩国医疗服务地区拥有 300 张或更多病床的急诊科对 30 天死亡率的影响:全国性回顾性横断面研究》。","authors":"Stephen Gyung Won Lee, Haibin Bai, Joo Won Park, Seonhwa Lee, Mi Young Kwak, Won Mo Jang","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disparities in emergency care accessibility exist between health service areas (HSAs). There is limited evidence on whether the presence of an emergency department (ED) that exceeds a certain hospital bed capacity is associated with emergency patient outcomes at the regional level. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of HSAs with or without of regional or local emergency centers with 300 or more hospital beds (EC300 or nEC300, respectively) by comparing the 30-day mortality of patients with severe emergency diseases (SEDs) admitted to the hospital through the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study retrospectively evaluated data from the National Health Information Database (NHID) of the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) Claims database and enrolled patients who were admitted from the ED for SEDs. SEDs were defined using ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision) codes for 28 disease categories with high severity, and 56 HSAs were designated as published by the NHIS. We performed hierarchical logistic regression analysis using multilevel models with the generalized linear mixed model (GLIMMIX) procedure to evaluate whether EC300 was associated with the 30-day mortality of SED patients, adjusting for patient-level, prehospital-level, hospital-level, and HSA-level variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 662 478 patients were analyzed, of whom 54 839 (8.3%) died within 30 days after hospital discharge. Of the 56 HSAs, 46 (82.1%) were included in the EC300 group. After adjustment for patient-level, prehospital-level, hospital-level, and HSA-level variables, nEC300 was significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality in SED patients (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.137-1.153). In addition, patients who visited EDs with fewer annual SED admissions were associated with higher 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>nEC300 had a greater risk of 30-day mortality in patients treated with SEDs than EC300. The results indicate that not only the number of EDs in each HSA is important for ensuring adequate patient outcomes but also the presence of EDs with adequate receiving capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":" ","pages":"8010"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the Presence of Emergency Departments With 300 or More Hospital Beds in Health Service Areas on 30-Day Mortality in Korea: A Nationwide Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Gyung Won Lee, Haibin Bai, Joo Won Park, Seonhwa Lee, Mi Young Kwak, Won Mo Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disparities in emergency care accessibility exist between health service areas (HSAs). There is limited evidence on whether the presence of an emergency department (ED) that exceeds a certain hospital bed capacity is associated with emergency patient outcomes at the regional level. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of HSAs with or without of regional or local emergency centers with 300 or more hospital beds (EC300 or nEC300, respectively) by comparing the 30-day mortality of patients with severe emergency diseases (SEDs) admitted to the hospital through the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study retrospectively evaluated data from the National Health Information Database (NHID) of the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) Claims database and enrolled patients who were admitted from the ED for SEDs. SEDs were defined using ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision) codes for 28 disease categories with high severity, and 56 HSAs were designated as published by the NHIS. We performed hierarchical logistic regression analysis using multilevel models with the generalized linear mixed model (GLIMMIX) procedure to evaluate whether EC300 was associated with the 30-day mortality of SED patients, adjusting for patient-level, prehospital-level, hospital-level, and HSA-level variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 662 478 patients were analyzed, of whom 54 839 (8.3%) died within 30 days after hospital discharge. Of the 56 HSAs, 46 (82.1%) were included in the EC300 group. After adjustment for patient-level, prehospital-level, hospital-level, and HSA-level variables, nEC300 was significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality in SED patients (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.137-1.153). In addition, patients who visited EDs with fewer annual SED admissions were associated with higher 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>nEC300 had a greater risk of 30-day mortality in patients treated with SEDs than EC300. The results indicate that not only the number of EDs in each HSA is important for ensuring adequate patient outcomes but also the presence of EDs with adequate receiving capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Policy and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270603/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Policy and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不同卫生服务区(HSAs)之间在急诊服务可及性方面存在差异。在地区层面上,急诊科(ED)床位超过一定容量是否与急诊病人的治疗效果有关,这方面的证据很有限。本研究的目的是通过比较通过急诊科入院的严重急症(SED)患者的 30 天死亡率,评估拥有或不拥有 300 张或更多病床的地区或地方急诊中心(分别为 EC300 或 nEC300)的 HSA 的影响:该研究对韩国国民健康保险索赔数据库中的数据进行了回顾性评估,并登记了因 SED 而从急诊室入院的患者。SED是根据韩国国民健康保险服务机构公布的28种严重程度较高的疾病类别的ICD-10代码定义的,并指定了56种HSA。我们使用广义线性混合模型(GLIMMIX)程序的多层次模型进行了分层逻辑回归分析,以评估EC300是否与SED患者的30天死亡率相关,并对患者层面、院前层面、医院层面和HSA层面的变量进行了调整:共分析了662,478名患者,其中54,839人(8.3%)在出院后30天内死亡。在56个HSA中,46个(82.1%)被纳入EC300组。在对患者层面、院前层面、医院层面和 HSA 层面的变量进行调整后,nEC300 与 SED 患者 30 天死亡率的增加显著相关(AOR:1.33,95% CI:1.137-1.153)。结论:与 EC300 相比,nEC300 与 SED 患者 30 天死亡率增加的风险更大。结果表明,不仅每个 HSA 中的急诊室数量对确保患者获得适当的治疗效果非常重要,而且急诊室是否具有足够的接收能力也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of the Presence of Emergency Departments With 300 or More Hospital Beds in Health Service Areas on 30-Day Mortality in Korea: A Nationwide Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.

Background: Disparities in emergency care accessibility exist between health service areas (HSAs). There is limited evidence on whether the presence of an emergency department (ED) that exceeds a certain hospital bed capacity is associated with emergency patient outcomes at the regional level. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of HSAs with or without of regional or local emergency centers with 300 or more hospital beds (EC300 or nEC300, respectively) by comparing the 30-day mortality of patients with severe emergency diseases (SEDs) admitted to the hospital through the ED.

Methods: The study retrospectively evaluated data from the National Health Information Database (NHID) of the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) Claims database and enrolled patients who were admitted from the ED for SEDs. SEDs were defined using ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision) codes for 28 disease categories with high severity, and 56 HSAs were designated as published by the NHIS. We performed hierarchical logistic regression analysis using multilevel models with the generalized linear mixed model (GLIMMIX) procedure to evaluate whether EC300 was associated with the 30-day mortality of SED patients, adjusting for patient-level, prehospital-level, hospital-level, and HSA-level variables.

Results: In total, 662 478 patients were analyzed, of whom 54 839 (8.3%) died within 30 days after hospital discharge. Of the 56 HSAs, 46 (82.1%) were included in the EC300 group. After adjustment for patient-level, prehospital-level, hospital-level, and HSA-level variables, nEC300 was significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality in SED patients (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.137-1.153). In addition, patients who visited EDs with fewer annual SED admissions were associated with higher 30-day mortality.

Conclusion: nEC300 had a greater risk of 30-day mortality in patients treated with SEDs than EC300. The results indicate that not only the number of EDs in each HSA is important for ensuring adequate patient outcomes but also the presence of EDs with adequate receiving capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信