比较慢性腰痛患者和健康人群在站立屈髋时腰大肌的激活情况。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Congcong Cai, Nurul Adliah Gazali, Xin Ning Tan, Benjamin Soon, Adrian Thian Huat Lee, Qian Wen Simone Aw, Dharini D/O Dana, Joanne Ching Tung Kwok, Mei Jun Kwa
{"title":"比较慢性腰痛患者和健康人群在站立屈髋时腰大肌的激活情况。","authors":"Congcong Cai, Nurul Adliah Gazali, Xin Ning Tan, Benjamin Soon, Adrian Thian Huat Lee, Qian Wen Simone Aw, Dharini D/O Dana, Joanne Ching Tung Kwok, Mei Jun Kwa","doi":"10.3233/BMR-230384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The psoas major (PM) has been identified as a potential contributor to chronic low back pain (LBP). However, few studies have investigated the effects of upright functional movement on PM activation in cLBP individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study aims to compare PM muscle activation characteristics in chronic LBP (cLBP) and healthy subjects during the transition from quiet double-leg standing to standing hip flexion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ultrasound Imaging was used to assess PM thickness at the lumbar vertebral level of L4-5 in 12 healthy and 12 cLBP participants. The changes in thickness between the test positions were utilized as a proxy for PM activation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cLBP group exhibited greater thickness changes on the non-dominant side PM during contralateral hip flexion but not ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.369) compared to their healthy counterparts (p= 0.011; cLBP: resting 27.85 mm, activated 34.63 mm; healthy: resting 29.51 mm, activated 29.00 mm). There were no significant differences in dominant side PM thickness changes between the two groups during either contralateral or ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.306 and p= 0.077).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest a potential overactivation of the PM in the cLBP population. This insight may aid in the development of tailored rehabilitation programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of psoas major activation during standing hip flexion between chronic low back pain and healthy populations.\",\"authors\":\"Congcong Cai, Nurul Adliah Gazali, Xin Ning Tan, Benjamin Soon, Adrian Thian Huat Lee, Qian Wen Simone Aw, Dharini D/O Dana, Joanne Ching Tung Kwok, Mei Jun Kwa\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/BMR-230384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The psoas major (PM) has been identified as a potential contributor to chronic low back pain (LBP). However, few studies have investigated the effects of upright functional movement on PM activation in cLBP individuals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cross-sectional study aims to compare PM muscle activation characteristics in chronic LBP (cLBP) and healthy subjects during the transition from quiet double-leg standing to standing hip flexion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ultrasound Imaging was used to assess PM thickness at the lumbar vertebral level of L4-5 in 12 healthy and 12 cLBP participants. The changes in thickness between the test positions were utilized as a proxy for PM activation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cLBP group exhibited greater thickness changes on the non-dominant side PM during contralateral hip flexion but not ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.369) compared to their healthy counterparts (p= 0.011; cLBP: resting 27.85 mm, activated 34.63 mm; healthy: resting 29.51 mm, activated 29.00 mm). There were no significant differences in dominant side PM thickness changes between the two groups during either contralateral or ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.306 and p= 0.077).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest a potential overactivation of the PM in the cLBP population. This insight may aid in the development of tailored rehabilitation programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230384\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰大肌(PM)被认为是导致慢性腰背痛(LBP)的潜在因素。然而,很少有研究调查了直立功能运动对慢性腰背痛患者腰大肌激活的影响:本横断面研究旨在比较慢性腰背痛患者(cLBP)和健康受试者在从安静双腿站立过渡到站立屈髋时的 PM 肌肉激活特征:方法:采用超声波成像技术评估12名健康受试者和12名慢性膀胱炎受试者腰椎L4-5水平的腓肠肌厚度。测试体位之间的厚度变化被用作 PM 激活的替代指标:cLBP 组与健康组相比,在对侧屈曲髋关节时,非优势侧 PM 的厚度变化更大(p= 0.369),而同侧屈曲髋关节时则没有变化(p= 0.011;cLBP:静止时 27.85 毫米,激活时 34.63 毫米;健康:静止时 29.51 毫米,激活时 29.00 毫米)。在对侧或同侧屈髋时,两组间优势侧 PM 厚度变化无明显差异(p= 0.306 和 p= 0.077):我们的研究结果表明,在cLBP人群中,PM可能会过度激活。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在 cLBP 患者中存在 PM 过度激活的可能性,这一观点可能有助于制定有针对性的康复计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of psoas major activation during standing hip flexion between chronic low back pain and healthy populations.

Background: The psoas major (PM) has been identified as a potential contributor to chronic low back pain (LBP). However, few studies have investigated the effects of upright functional movement on PM activation in cLBP individuals.

Objective: This cross-sectional study aims to compare PM muscle activation characteristics in chronic LBP (cLBP) and healthy subjects during the transition from quiet double-leg standing to standing hip flexion.

Methods: Ultrasound Imaging was used to assess PM thickness at the lumbar vertebral level of L4-5 in 12 healthy and 12 cLBP participants. The changes in thickness between the test positions were utilized as a proxy for PM activation.

Results: The cLBP group exhibited greater thickness changes on the non-dominant side PM during contralateral hip flexion but not ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.369) compared to their healthy counterparts (p= 0.011; cLBP: resting 27.85 mm, activated 34.63 mm; healthy: resting 29.51 mm, activated 29.00 mm). There were no significant differences in dominant side PM thickness changes between the two groups during either contralateral or ipsilateral hip flexion (p= 0.306 and p= 0.077).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest a potential overactivation of the PM in the cLBP population. This insight may aid in the development of tailored rehabilitation programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信