是否应在二级护理中停用管道氧化亚氮:成本效益分析。

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_791_23
Amer Majeed, Amreen M Awan
{"title":"是否应在二级护理中停用管道氧化亚氮:成本效益分析。","authors":"Amer Majeed, Amreen M Awan","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_791_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) has seen a marked decline in its usage in recent years due to its adverse clinical effects. We audited the practice in our department to evaluate the N<sub>2</sub>O consumption and cost-effectiveness of its supply.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Electronic anesthesia records of all patients anesthetized in our main operating rooms in a typical month were reviewed retrospectively, and utilization of N<sub>2</sub>O was noted in addition to the patient demographics, surgical procedure, and specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 950 patients were anesthetized, and 3.1% received N<sub>2</sub>O. The annual usage was estimated to be 72,871 liters, with a leakage of 3,883,105 liters to the environment, posing a safety hazard and wasting 149,612.50 SAR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Notable costs and environmental benefits may be achieved by substituting a piped supply of N<sub>2</sub>O with portable E-cylinders on demand in operating rooms for rational use.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11033912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should pipeline nitrous oxide be discontinued in secondary care: A cost-benefit analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Amer Majeed, Amreen M Awan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sja.sja_791_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) has seen a marked decline in its usage in recent years due to its adverse clinical effects. We audited the practice in our department to evaluate the N<sub>2</sub>O consumption and cost-effectiveness of its supply.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Electronic anesthesia records of all patients anesthetized in our main operating rooms in a typical month were reviewed retrospectively, and utilization of N<sub>2</sub>O was noted in addition to the patient demographics, surgical procedure, and specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 950 patients were anesthetized, and 3.1% received N<sub>2</sub>O. The annual usage was estimated to be 72,871 liters, with a leakage of 3,883,105 liters to the environment, posing a safety hazard and wasting 149,612.50 SAR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Notable costs and environmental benefits may be achieved by substituting a piped supply of N<sub>2</sub>O with portable E-cylinders on demand in operating rooms for rational use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11033912/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_791_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_791_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,由于一氧化二氮(N2O)的不良临床影响,其使用量明显下降。我们对本部门的做法进行了审计,以评估一氧化二氮的消耗量及其供应的成本效益:方法:回顾性审查我科主要手术室一个月内所有麻醉患者的电子麻醉记录,除了患者人口统计学、手术过程和专科外,还记录了一氧化二氮的使用情况:共有 950 名患者接受了麻醉,其中 3.1% 接受了一氧化二氮。每年的用量估计为 72,871 升,其中 3,883,105 升泄漏到环境中,造成了安全隐患和 149,612.50 特区的浪费:结论:通过在手术室合理使用便携式电子气瓶来替代管道供应的一氧化二氮,可以实现显著的成本和环境效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should pipeline nitrous oxide be discontinued in secondary care: A cost-benefit analysis.

Background: Nitrous oxide (N2O) has seen a marked decline in its usage in recent years due to its adverse clinical effects. We audited the practice in our department to evaluate the N2O consumption and cost-effectiveness of its supply.

Methodology: Electronic anesthesia records of all patients anesthetized in our main operating rooms in a typical month were reviewed retrospectively, and utilization of N2O was noted in addition to the patient demographics, surgical procedure, and specialty.

Results: A total of 950 patients were anesthetized, and 3.1% received N2O. The annual usage was estimated to be 72,871 liters, with a leakage of 3,883,105 liters to the environment, posing a safety hazard and wasting 149,612.50 SAR.

Conclusion: Notable costs and environmental benefits may be achieved by substituting a piped supply of N2O with portable E-cylinders on demand in operating rooms for rational use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信