Wade Thompson, Carina Lundby, Adam Bleik, Harman Waring, Jung Ah Hong, Chris Xi, Carmel Hughes, Douglas M Salzwedel, Emily G McDonald, Jennifer Pruskowski, Sion Scott, Anne Spinewine, Jean S Kutner, Trine Graabæk, Shahrzad Elmi, Frank Moriarty
{"title":"在去处方化试验中衡量生活质量:范围审查》。","authors":"Wade Thompson, Carina Lundby, Adam Bleik, Harman Waring, Jung Ah Hong, Chris Xi, Carmel Hughes, Douglas M Salzwedel, Emily G McDonald, Jennifer Pruskowski, Sion Scott, Anne Spinewine, Jean S Kutner, Trine Graabæk, Shahrzad Elmi, Frank Moriarty","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01113-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome to capture in clinical trials evaluating deprescribing interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to conduct a scoping review to examine how QoL has been measured in deprescribing trials among older people and identify potentially relevant QoL scales, to better inform QoL measurement in future deprescribing trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, Epistemonikos, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of eligible studies (from inception to October 2023). We included randomized and non-randomized comparative studies with a control group that evaluated deprescribing and polypharmacy reduction interventions in people ≥ 65 years of age and measured QoL as an outcome. We also included studies describing the development and validation of QoL scales related to deprescribing, polypharmacy, or medication burden in adults ≥ 18 years of age. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, then full texts. Two independent reviewers extracted data from 25% of eligible studies in order to verify agreement, then a single reviewer extracted data from the remaining studies, which a second reviewer cross-checked. We critically appraised scales based on the COSMIN checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved 7290 articles, of which 52 were eligible for inclusion, including 44 deprescribing trials and eight scale development studies. From these studies, we found 21 scales that have been used in the context of deprescribing/polypharmacy (12 generic scales used in clinical trials and nine medication-specific scales). Variations of the generic EQ-5D were the most used scales. The measurement properties of scales for capturing changes in QoL from deprescribing were uncertain. Medication-specific QoL scales have not been employed in deprescribing clinical trials and thus, their performance in this context is also not clear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several existing QoL scales have been applied to the context of deprescribing/polypharmacy clinical trials, and new scales specific to the problem have been proposed. If deprescribing does impact QoL, our findings suggest it is uncertain whether existing QoL scales can practically and reliably capture such a change or whether any scale is best. However, this review compares various aspects of the scales that researchers and clinicians can consider in decisions about measuring QoL in deprescribing trials, and in planning future research.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>Open Science Framework: osf.io/aez6w.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"379-397"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Quality of Life in Deprescribing Trials: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Wade Thompson, Carina Lundby, Adam Bleik, Harman Waring, Jung Ah Hong, Chris Xi, Carmel Hughes, Douglas M Salzwedel, Emily G McDonald, Jennifer Pruskowski, Sion Scott, Anne Spinewine, Jean S Kutner, Trine Graabæk, Shahrzad Elmi, Frank Moriarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40266-024-01113-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome to capture in clinical trials evaluating deprescribing interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to conduct a scoping review to examine how QoL has been measured in deprescribing trials among older people and identify potentially relevant QoL scales, to better inform QoL measurement in future deprescribing trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, Epistemonikos, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of eligible studies (from inception to October 2023). We included randomized and non-randomized comparative studies with a control group that evaluated deprescribing and polypharmacy reduction interventions in people ≥ 65 years of age and measured QoL as an outcome. We also included studies describing the development and validation of QoL scales related to deprescribing, polypharmacy, or medication burden in adults ≥ 18 years of age. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, then full texts. Two independent reviewers extracted data from 25% of eligible studies in order to verify agreement, then a single reviewer extracted data from the remaining studies, which a second reviewer cross-checked. We critically appraised scales based on the COSMIN checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved 7290 articles, of which 52 were eligible for inclusion, including 44 deprescribing trials and eight scale development studies. From these studies, we found 21 scales that have been used in the context of deprescribing/polypharmacy (12 generic scales used in clinical trials and nine medication-specific scales). Variations of the generic EQ-5D were the most used scales. The measurement properties of scales for capturing changes in QoL from deprescribing were uncertain. Medication-specific QoL scales have not been employed in deprescribing clinical trials and thus, their performance in this context is also not clear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several existing QoL scales have been applied to the context of deprescribing/polypharmacy clinical trials, and new scales specific to the problem have been proposed. If deprescribing does impact QoL, our findings suggest it is uncertain whether existing QoL scales can practically and reliably capture such a change or whether any scale is best. However, this review compares various aspects of the scales that researchers and clinicians can consider in decisions about measuring QoL in deprescribing trials, and in planning future research.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>Open Science Framework: osf.io/aez6w.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs & Aging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"379-397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01113-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01113-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:生活质量(QoL在评估去势干预措施的临床试验中,生活质量(QoL)是一项重要的结果:我们的目的是进行一次范围界定审查,研究如何在老年人的去处方化试验中测量 QoL,并确定可能相关的 QoL 量表,以便在未来的去处方化试验中更好地测量 QoL:我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane对照试验中央登记册、Google Scholar、Epistemonikos、ClinicalTrials.gov以及符合条件的研究的参考文献列表(从开始到2023年10月)。我们纳入了带有对照组的随机和非随机比较研究,这些研究评估了针对≥ 65 岁人群的去处方化和减少多药滥用干预措施,并将 QoL 作为一项结果进行了测量。我们还纳入了描述与≥18 岁成人的去处方化、多药联用或用药负担相关的 QoL 量表的开发和验证的研究。两名独立审稿人首先筛选了标题和摘要,然后筛选了全文。两位独立审稿人提取了 25% 符合条件的研究数据,以验证一致性,然后由一位审稿人提取其余研究的数据,再由第二位审稿人进行交叉核对。我们根据 COSMIN 检查表对量表进行了严格评估:我们检索了 7290 篇文章,其中 52 篇符合纳入条件,包括 44 项处方试验和 8 项量表开发研究。在这些研究中,我们发现了 21 个用于去处方化/配药的量表(12 个用于临床试验的通用量表和 9 个药物特异性量表)。通用 EQ-5D 的变体是使用最多的量表。这些量表在捕捉减药引起的 QoL 变化方面的测量特性尚不确定。针对特定药物的 QoL 量表尚未在去处方化临床试验中使用过,因此,它们在这种情况下的表现也不明确:结论:现有的几种 QoL 量表已被应用于去处方/配药临床试验中,并提出了专门针对该问题的新量表。我们的研究结果表明,如果去处方化确实影响了 QoL,那么现有的 QoL 量表是否能切实可靠地反映出这种变化,或者是否任何量表都是最好的,这些都是不确定的。不过,本综述对量表的各个方面进行了比较,研究人员和临床医生在决定是否在去处方化试验中测量 QoL 以及规划未来研究时,可以考虑这些量表:协议注册:开放科学框架:osf.io/aez6w。
Measuring Quality of Life in Deprescribing Trials: A Scoping Review.
Background: Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome to capture in clinical trials evaluating deprescribing interventions.
Objective: We aimed to conduct a scoping review to examine how QoL has been measured in deprescribing trials among older people and identify potentially relevant QoL scales, to better inform QoL measurement in future deprescribing trials.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, Epistemonikos, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of eligible studies (from inception to October 2023). We included randomized and non-randomized comparative studies with a control group that evaluated deprescribing and polypharmacy reduction interventions in people ≥ 65 years of age and measured QoL as an outcome. We also included studies describing the development and validation of QoL scales related to deprescribing, polypharmacy, or medication burden in adults ≥ 18 years of age. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, then full texts. Two independent reviewers extracted data from 25% of eligible studies in order to verify agreement, then a single reviewer extracted data from the remaining studies, which a second reviewer cross-checked. We critically appraised scales based on the COSMIN checklist.
Results: We retrieved 7290 articles, of which 52 were eligible for inclusion, including 44 deprescribing trials and eight scale development studies. From these studies, we found 21 scales that have been used in the context of deprescribing/polypharmacy (12 generic scales used in clinical trials and nine medication-specific scales). Variations of the generic EQ-5D were the most used scales. The measurement properties of scales for capturing changes in QoL from deprescribing were uncertain. Medication-specific QoL scales have not been employed in deprescribing clinical trials and thus, their performance in this context is also not clear.
Conclusions: Several existing QoL scales have been applied to the context of deprescribing/polypharmacy clinical trials, and new scales specific to the problem have been proposed. If deprescribing does impact QoL, our findings suggest it is uncertain whether existing QoL scales can practically and reliably capture such a change or whether any scale is best. However, this review compares various aspects of the scales that researchers and clinicians can consider in decisions about measuring QoL in deprescribing trials, and in planning future research.
Protocol registration: Open Science Framework: osf.io/aez6w.
期刊介绍:
Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly.
The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.